to take the most-often-touted example of the nehru dynasty scion, are the nehru dynasty's hands free of blood? 1984 sikh pogrom? emergency? nellie? doda 2006 massacre? kulgam 2006 massacre?
Neither Dhume, nor his article or ,for that matter, the WSJ are relevant. Rather, the recent posturing by the Kkangress and it's mouthpieces, including the Slimes and the Chindu, before and after Modi appeared before the SIT is the stuff that's really interesting. What substance do they have, and why now? What really transpired during the 2 sessions?
I wonder why again and again people are stating that Modi is guilty or passing their verdict on him from the Indian media to congress to the left intelligentsia to this dim wit Dhume. After the conclusion of the investigation and final verdict Modi should file a defamation case against all who have without a shred of evidence have maligned him.
Modi should and will be PM and the Indian public will ensure it.
I read this article yesterday along with some another POS written by Vir Singhavi (on Big B) on TOI. So much bias in these objective/"secular" writers.
6 comments:
are u kidding me? i have to pay to read the sh** that WSJ produces? uh, no.
Modi makes a formidable opponent for the Nehru Dynasty. Is it any surprise that the Dynasty's pets and poodles are out to demonize him.
The BJP should incessantly talk about, 1984 ( when a big tree falls), emergency (fascism), Bhagalpur and ofcourse Hyd riots.
Though the major part of Dhume's article is a prime example of p-sec bullshit I am glad that
1. he has mentioned Godhra train burning and the people behind it.
2. he has highlighted quite a few infrastructural facilities like uninterrupted power supply, ports, GIFT city, good roads and double digit growth.
-SIGH- Now only if the rest of the article were as truthful and objective.
Neither Dhume, nor his article or ,for that matter, the WSJ are relevant. Rather, the recent posturing by the Kkangress and it's mouthpieces, including the Slimes and the Chindu, before and after Modi appeared before the SIT is the stuff that's really interesting. What substance do they have, and why now? What really transpired during the 2 sessions?
I wonder why again and again people are stating that Modi is guilty or passing their verdict on him from the Indian media to congress to the left intelligentsia to this dim wit Dhume. After the conclusion of the investigation and final verdict Modi should file a defamation case against all who have without a shred of evidence have maligned him.
Modi should and will be PM and the Indian public will ensure it.
http://sowingseedsofthought.blogspot.com/
I read this article yesterday along with some another POS written by Vir Singhavi (on Big B) on TOI. So much bias in these objective/"secular" writers.
Post a Comment