oct 31st, 2007
this is hilarious. if the yanks had made even one little attempt to help india win the security council seat, this would have had so much more credibility!
kissinger's next trick will be to suggest that he can arrange the nobel peace prize for manmohan, sonia and musharraf if india gives kashmir to pakistan. of course, manmohan will be eager to do that. after all, he has said in public that all of india's resources are meant primarily for mohammedans.
quote:
Henry Kissinger, the former U.S. secretary of state, declared in an interview with a private Indian television station, CNN-IBN, that for India to shelve the deal would affect negotiations on other matters with the United States, including its aspirations for a permanent Security Council seat.
unquote
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/10/31/asia/letter.php
Thursday, November 01, 2007
dubai: arabs doing their thing with young french boy
oct 30th, 2007
and dubai is supposed to be a liberal arab country. what was it that disgusting yank woman robin raphel said about pakistan: "a modern, moderate, model mohammedan state"? well, dubai is all that.
you can take the barbarian out of the desert, but you can't take the desert out of the barbarian.
the desert persists in the semitic cults.
so true of christists as well -- this is why their godmen drop their pants as soon as a young boy shows up. (i wonder what happened to the latest pervert, monsignor godman tommaso of the vatican. i'm sure it's all been hushed up.)
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/10/31/africa/dubai.php
and dubai is supposed to be a liberal arab country. what was it that disgusting yank woman robin raphel said about pakistan: "a modern, moderate, model mohammedan state"? well, dubai is all that.
you can take the barbarian out of the desert, but you can't take the desert out of the barbarian.
the desert persists in the semitic cults.
so true of christists as well -- this is why their godmen drop their pants as soon as a young boy shows up. (i wonder what happened to the latest pervert, monsignor godman tommaso of the vatican. i'm sure it's all been hushed up.)
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/10/31/africa/dubai.php
nuclear deal and bjp
oct 31st, 2007
i am not sure the bjp has covered itself with glory on this one, as it has been in two minds: it wanted to take credit (deservedly) for having opened the door to the yanks to work with india, but it also knew this was a bad deal. so they kind of froze and didn't do much.
from the point of view of opponents to the deal (i don't include the communists who have a different agenda) the point was not to kill off the thing. the point was to renegotiate the deal until it met minimum standards of value for india.
a major way of doing this was to delay the thing until it became moot. i think this has been accomplished because the yanks will be too busy with elections now, but they are trying: they have trotted out that old war criminal kissinger and sent him to india to try and cajole indians. and this is the guy who told nixon that indians were untrustworthy :-)
the yanks need this deal more than india does, which is why they have bribed all sorts of people in india to shill for them. the commercials are juicy -- tens of billions of dollars for untested or obsolete designs from general electric and westinghouse. and the strategic value of dominating india's defense and energy future is worth a lot more.
the likelihood is that the deal was so sweet for the yanks that they will come back with a variant of it later. the reason is the rising military power of china, which terrifies the yanks. even the non-proliferation ayatollahs on the democrat side will eventually see that there is enough value in engaging india. the alternative for them will be that india, gasp, will decide that nuclear fission especially using obsolete american technologies is a bad deal (as brahma has been saying, and parenthetically i wouldn't call him virulently opposed, i think he has been systematically laying bare the treason-activity that the kaangress considers its birthright).
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: arun
Date: Oct 29, 2007 6:13 AM
Subject: nuclear deal and bjp
To:
i am not sure the bjp has covered itself with glory on this one, as it has been in two minds: it wanted to take credit (deservedly) for having opened the door to the yanks to work with india, but it also knew this was a bad deal. so they kind of froze and didn't do much.
from the point of view of opponents to the deal (i don't include the communists who have a different agenda) the point was not to kill off the thing. the point was to renegotiate the deal until it met minimum standards of value for india.
a major way of doing this was to delay the thing until it became moot. i think this has been accomplished because the yanks will be too busy with elections now, but they are trying: they have trotted out that old war criminal kissinger and sent him to india to try and cajole indians. and this is the guy who told nixon that indians were untrustworthy :-)
the yanks need this deal more than india does, which is why they have bribed all sorts of people in india to shill for them. the commercials are juicy -- tens of billions of dollars for untested or obsolete designs from general electric and westinghouse. and the strategic value of dominating india's defense and energy future is worth a lot more.
the likelihood is that the deal was so sweet for the yanks that they will come back with a variant of it later. the reason is the rising military power of china, which terrifies the yanks. even the non-proliferation ayatollahs on the democrat side will eventually see that there is enough value in engaging india. the alternative for them will be that india, gasp, will decide that nuclear fission especially using obsolete american technologies is a bad deal (as brahma has been saying, and parenthetically i wouldn't call him virulently opposed, i think he has been systematically laying bare the treason-activity that the kaangress considers its birthright).
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: arun
Date: Oct 29, 2007 6:13 AM
Subject: nuclear deal and bjp
To:
I have for long time not closely followed the nuclear deal, but with my limited understanding, this thought just came to my mind. And for whatever it is worth, here it is:
why can't the BJP constitute a panel of experts like Brahma Chellaney ( who has been virulently oppossing the deal), Abdul Kalam ( who even though has not spoken against or for the deal, has emphasized that India needs to be self sufficient through thorium technology, ) and Anil Kakodkar ( who has recently defended the deal, but overall I believe has the best interests of the country) ...
and then demand that the changes recommended by this panel of experts be made, and then it will support the deal in parliament. If the demands are not accepted then it would become clear that it was in not in the best interests of India (and BJP can take the credit of trying, but not compromising) . If indeed the demands are accepted, then the left would be sidelined totally and still BJP would get credit for making those pro-india changes and seeing it through
comments ? or am i missing something big time ?
arun
Modi in Indian Express
A fantastic interview of Narendra Modi in IE today.
With some characteristically lucid, emphatic and unambiguous responses.
No wonder the 4M ELM hates him. He is everything they've been afraid of.
Excerpts...
With some characteristically lucid, emphatic and unambiguous responses.
No wonder the 4M ELM hates him. He is everything they've been afraid of.
Excerpts...
[On, ho-hum, his role in the riots]
The common man has never asked me this question. I go to thousands of meetings and seminars, but I was never asked this question. This question emanates from a particular group, which has vested interest, which belongs to a particular ideology. I have a question for these people. In 2002 the entire media was after me that I was contesting the election on emotive issues, that I did not talk about development. And now in 2007 when I talk about development they asked me why I am shy of discussing emotive issues! I would like to ask these people in the media why don’t they want to talk about development this time.
But he [Togadia] says that Hindus are not safe in Modi’s Gujarat?Thirty per cent of the districts in the country are living under the shadow of the gun — terrorism, Naxalism, insurgency, you name it. These are Government of India figures. Compared to all these areas, Gujarat is an oasis of peace and security.
The BJP is upset about the transfer of officers recently ordered by the Election Commission. What are your objections?If police officers are changed in Gujarat and not in Himachal Pradesh, it will raise doubts in the mind of the common man. The Gujarat Government is instructed to remove photographs of ministers from its websites within 24 hours. But you can see the ministers’ photographs even today on Himachal websites. It is in such a situation that questions are raised about the EC.
US-India Partnerships critical: Pentagon Official
From the Article,
Rather than fear India’s global transformation, Clad said, The United States should embrace the opportunity to assist and advise the country.
“It’s about maintaining a type of equilibrium, about accepting India’s rise into a type of maturity and power and prowess I think we broadly welcome,” he said.
Rather than fear India’s global transformation, Clad said, The United States should embrace the opportunity to assist and advise the country.
“It’s about maintaining a type of equilibrium, about accepting India’s rise into a type of maturity and power and prowess I think we broadly welcome,” he said.
LTTE targeting students for conscription
LTTE targets more families for conscription
Those seeking higher education told to give brother/sister to Tigers:
-RANIL WIJAYAPALA in Omanthai
The LTTE, the self-claimed sole representative of the Tamil people in the North-East has imposed yet another restriction on Tamil youth in the Vanni to curtail their university education by making it compulsory for one of their family members to join the Tiger outfit, for them to proceed to their respective universities to continue university education..............
-deleted
Karunanidhi and Baalu's "dravidian" christist comrades further south in Sri Lanka are a lunatic death cult. Therefore, they would obviously seek to curtail the power of thinking and inquiry that a proper education may inculcate among those Tamil students. Some dravidian fool claimed recently on this blog that the dravidian movement used self-immolations in the anti-Hindi agitation, hence was "non-violent".
Next, the dravidians will claim that suicide bombing is harmless, which incidentally they co-invented with the Hizbollah.
Those seeking higher education told to give brother/sister to Tigers:
-RANIL WIJAYAPALA in Omanthai
The LTTE, the self-claimed sole representative of the Tamil people in the North-East has imposed yet another restriction on Tamil youth in the Vanni to curtail their university education by making it compulsory for one of their family members to join the Tiger outfit, for them to proceed to their respective universities to continue university education..............
-deleted
Karunanidhi and Baalu's "dravidian" christist comrades further south in Sri Lanka are a lunatic death cult. Therefore, they would obviously seek to curtail the power of thinking and inquiry that a proper education may inculcate among those Tamil students. Some dravidian fool claimed recently on this blog that the dravidian movement used self-immolations in the anti-Hindi agitation, hence was "non-violent".
Next, the dravidians will claim that suicide bombing is harmless, which incidentally they co-invented with the Hizbollah.
Secular taliban demands cancellation of Gujarat elections
"A number of eminent persons, activists, educationists and people from all walks of life today called for cancellation of the elections to the Gujarat Assembly, scheduled in December................In a petition, they urged the President, the Prime Minister, the Chief Justice and the Election Commission to......."
deleted
Among the eminent persons are danseuses Aditi Mangaldas and Mallika Sarabhai, actor Nandita Das, Chitra Subramanium, eminent lawyer Kamini Jaiswal, activist Shabnam Hashmi and eminent Father Cedric Prakash.
Now, this is confusing. I thought the secular taliban were accusing the fascist Narendra Modi and the communal Hindutva forces of dictatorial proclivities and anti-democratic tendencies. Why would they want to interfere with the election process that is the foundation of our dhimmocracy? Also, who exactly pronounces them "eminent" ?
deleted
Among the eminent persons are danseuses Aditi Mangaldas and Mallika Sarabhai, actor Nandita Das, Chitra Subramanium, eminent lawyer Kamini Jaiswal, activist Shabnam Hashmi and eminent Father Cedric Prakash.
Now, this is confusing. I thought the secular taliban were accusing the fascist Narendra Modi and the communal Hindutva forces of dictatorial proclivities and anti-democratic tendencies. Why would they want to interfere with the election process that is the foundation of our dhimmocracy? Also, who exactly pronounces them "eminent" ?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)