Monday, January 30, 2006

Scientists announce new concept of reactor

jan 30th

i wish this were totally true. if it were, india could say "up yours" to the nuclear suppliers' group and to mulford the american ambassador.

india's future cannot depend on uranium-powered reactors. that would be suicidal, as others have all the uranium in the world.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: siva
Date: Jan 30, 2006 12:22 AM
Subject: Scientists announce new concept of reactor
To: Rajeev Srinivasan < rajeev.srinivasan@gmail.com>

In one of your articles you have argued that India would be better off with thorium reactors. So I thought this news item would encourage you.
 
Scientists announce new concept of reactor

- NDTV Correspondent

Sunday, January 29, 2006 (New Delhi):

Indian atomic scientists have announced a new concept of reactor that does not rely on natural or enriched uranium.

The new reactor can run on thorium, that India has in plenty, and a small amount of "seed" plutonium, which India can recover from its spent fuel that has been accumulating over the years.

Called "A Thorium Breeder Reactor" (ATBR), it has been evolved by scientists of the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) in Mumbai and has already attracted international attention.

"The ATBR combines the merits of existing heavy water and light water reactor technologies and is tailor-made for large scale utilisation of thorium," BARC Physicists V Jagannathan and Uma Pal announced in a paper published in the journal Current Science.

Incessant energy

One of the unique features of the ATBR concept is loading of thorium oxide fuel rods in specially designed "flux trap" or fissile breeding zones, according to the journal which featured the new reactor concept on the cover page.

With an initial charge of about 2.2 tonnes of reactor grade plutonium, the predominantly thorium loaded core of ATBR "is capable of delivering incessant energy of 600 MW for two years with no refuelling and with no significant mechanical control manoeuvres," the Physicists reported.

"The (plutonium) fissile seed remains conserved for a long duration of six years (three fuel cycles) due to its location in the fuel cluster."

Fuel cycle duration

Scientists said they have been able to prolong the nuclear energy extraction process by designing in such a way that the number of fissile atoms consumed are replenished with new fissile atoms in the same reactor and within the same fuel cycle duration.

"This would require a delicate balance of the fissile depletion and production rates at all times," they said.

This does not happen in the present-day power reactors because fissile depletion is normally at a much higher rate than the rate of production of new ones. (PTI)

money shanker iyer's exit?

jan 30th

i didn't read the news carefully, but what is the scoop behind the fact that money shanker iyer has been shunted aside from his perch in the energy ministry?

my conjecture is that even this marxist/pakistani-lover has not been able to push the iran-pakistan-india pipeline through. so they'll now bring in somebody who will be even more keen on putting this suicidal project together (can you say "pakistan has us by the short-and-curlies"?).

i wonder if the saudi king's visit included some new largesse for congress ministers who do things for global mohammedan interests.

Globalisation & Davos

jan 30th

white guys are having second thoughts about globalization when it turned out *not* to be colonialism by other means. they were expecting to rape and pillage under WTO, but the disruptive technology of the internet has really surprised them! amazing, what a simple technology can do.

this is sort of what happened with the european invention of the steam engine and big naval guns: that suddenly enabled them to go on the colonization spree.

the internet has created an inflection point which india can take advantage of.

in the long run, the us is very vulnerable.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rajan
Date: Jan 31, 2006 11:13 AM
Subject: Globalisation & Davos
To: Rajeev Srinivasan <rajeev.srinivasan@gmail.com>


http://www.morganstanley.com/GEFdata/digests/20060127-fri.html#anchor0



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

obsession with mittal's skin color

jan 30th

reading between the lines, white guys are really not very happy to see an indian buy up their companies. the fact that mittal steel is a european company does not mollify them.

amazing, despite all their preaching to india, how they do not see that money has no color. mittal has become the world's 3rd richest man despite the fact that he is brown, not because of it!

if i were a betting man, i'd short arcelor right now. because the bid will not go through, and arcelor stock will take a big hit. actually that may be mittal's Plan B -- hurt his biggest competitor.

when white guys put money into other countries, it's 'FDI', a wonderful thing. if non-whites put money into white countries, it's 'colonialism'. the white guys must have learned their semantics from the indian marxists whose best is 'secular intervention', such a gem!

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Date: Jan 31, 2006 6:49 AM
Subject: I thought you would be interested to read this article from The Times
To: rajeev.srinivasan@gmail.com

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,542-2017133,00.html

Steel wheels

Indian entrepreneurship has much to offer the West

yasukuni enoki: japanese ambassador to india

jan 30th

i just noticed the name of the japanese ambassador to india: yasukuni enoki

the yasukuni shrine, which is a shinto memorial to japanese war heroes, is a big irritant to the chinese. the japanese should send this man as ambassador to china just to irriatate them. they will have to keep saying the name yasukuni :-)

More on China versus India with US hovering in the backgound

jan 30th

india-china hyphenation is the big story now.

as i said before, pervez "piss-process" musharraf and wen "indians are useful idiots" jiabao are not at all happy about this.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ram Narayanan <ram@usindiafriendship.us>
Date: Jan 30, 2006 11:37 PM
Subject: More on China versus India with US hovering in the backgound
To: rajeev.srinivasan@gmail.com

Dear Rajeev Srinivasan:

An expert on China who does strategic analyses of Chinese writing in Chinese language avers that China's central focus is the US. India finds only a marginal mention in passing, that too not in mainstream analyses. China's aim is to become the world's NUMBER ONE economic power. If getting the best out of the India relationship will help China, it will go for it. But on the border disputes with India, China has not diluted its stand to any significant extent.

A plethora of assessments of India versus China have been appearing in the international media in the last few days in the wake of last week's Davos World Economic Forum annual meeting in Switzerland.

First, Professor Yasheng Huang of MIT Sloan School of Management, who himself is of Chinese origin and writes on China, in an article titled, "China could learn from India's slow and quiet rise" in the FINANCIAL TIMES of January 23, 2006 ( https://registration.ft.com/registration/barrier?referer=&location=http%3A//news.ft.com/cms/s/e4462190-8c42-11da-9efb-0000779e2340.html), makes the following astute observations:

***India's GDP growth rate at 7-8 per cent is more impressive than than China's 9-10 per cent because India is achieving this result with just half of China's level of domestic investment in new factories and equipment, and only 10 per cent of China's foreign direct investment. The evidence is as clear as ever: China's growth stems from massive accumulation of resources, while India's growth comes from increasing efficiency.

***The microeconomic evidence also casts India in a better light. While India's
stock market has soared in recent years, the opposite has happened in China.
In 2001, the Shanghai Stock Market index reached 2,200 points; by 2005, half
the wealth wiped out. In April 2005, the Shanghai index stood at 1,135
points. This sharp deterioration occurred against a backdrop of GDP growth
exceeding 9 per cent a year. It is difficult to find another country that
has this strange combination of superb macroeconomic performance and dismal
microeconomic performance. It is a matter of time before the two patterns
converge.

***Why, then, is India gaining strength? Economists and analysts have
habitually derided India's inability to attract FDI. This single-minded
obsession with FDI is as strange as it is harmful. Academic studies have not
produced convincing evidence that FDI is the best path to economic
development compared with responsible economic policies, investment in
education and sound legal and financial institutions. In fact, one can
easily think of counter examples. Brazil was a darling of foreign investors
in the 1960s but ultimately let them down. Japan, Korea and Taiwan received
little FDI in the 1960s and 1970s but became among the world's most
successful economies.

***An economic litmus test is not whether a country can attract a lot of FDI
but whether it has a business environment that nurtures entrepreneurship,
supports healthy competition and is relatively free of heavy handed
political intervention. In this regard, India has done a better job than
China. From India emerged a group of world-class companies ranging from
Infosys in software, Ranbaxy in pharmaceuticals, Bajaj Auto in automobile
components and Mahindra in car assembly. This did not happen by accident.

***Although it has many flaws, India's financial system did not discriminate
against small private companies the way the Chinese financial system did.
Infosys benefited from this system. It was founded by seven entrepreneurs
with few political connections who nevertheless managed, without significant
hard assets, to obtain capital from Indian banks and the stock market in
the early 1990s. It is unimaginable that a Chinese bank would lend to a
Chinese equivalent of an Infosys.

***With few exceptions, the world-class manufacturing facilities for which
China is famous are products of FDI, not of indigenous Chinese companies.
Yes, "Made in China" labels are still more ubiquitous than "Made in India"
ones; but what is made in China is not necessarily made by China. Soon,
"Made in India" will be synonymous with "Made by India" and Indians will not
just get the wage benefits of globalisation but will also keep the profits
unlike so many cases in China.

***Pessimism about India has often been proved wrong. Take, for example, the
view that India lacks Chinese-level infrastructure and therefore cannot
compete with China. This is another "China myth" that the country grew
thanks largely to its heavy investment in infrastructure. This is a
fundamentally flawed reading of its growth story. In the 1980s, China had
poor infrastructure but turned in a superb economic performance. China built
its infrastructure after rather than before many years of economic
growth and accumulation of financial resources. The "China miracle" happened
not because it had glittering skyscrapers and modern highways but because
bold economic liberalisation and institutional reforms especially
agricultural reforms in the early 1980s created competition and nurtured
private entrepreneurship.

***For both China and India, there is a hidden downside in the obsession with
building world-class infrastructure. As developing countries, if they invest
more in infrastructure, they invest less in other things. Typically, basic
education, especially in rural areas, falls victim to massive investment
projects, which produce tangible and immediate results. China made a costly
mistake in the 1990s: it created many world-class facilities, but badly
under-invested in education. Chinese researchers reveal that a staggering
percentage of rural children could not finish secondary education. India,
meanwhile, has quietly but persistently improved its educational
provisions, especially in the rural areas. For sustainable economic
development, the quality and quantity of human capital will matter far more
than those of physical capital. India seems to have the right policy
priorities and if China does not invest in rural education soon, it may lose
its true competitive edge over India a well-educated and skilled
work-force that drives manufacturing success.

***Unless China embarks on bold institutional reforms, India may very well
outperform it in the next 20 years. But, hopefully, the biggest beneficiary
of the rise of India will be China itself. It will be forced to examine the
imperfections of its own economic model and to abandon its sense of
complacency acquired in the 1990s. China was light years ahead of India in
economic liberalisation in the 1980s. Today it lags behind in critical
aspects, such as reform that would permit more foreign investment and
domestic private entry in the financial sector. The time to act is now.

Second, in an article titled, "In India-China Race My Money Is on India" in BLOOMBERG.COM dated January 30, 2006, columnist William Pesek Jr. says:

***If you want to shock an audience of businesspeople, make this argument: Twenty years from now, India's rise will be more impressive than China's. Stephen Roach at Morgan Stanley says, "India is on the cusp of something big." As a share of gross domestic product, its burgeoning consumer sector is outpacing China, Europe and Japan. Economists are also noticing that India's economy is looking less like those in East Asia and more like those in the West.

William Pesek goes on to adduce reasons why China may not have the stuff to remain ahead of India by the year 2026. Click: http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000039&refer=columnist_pesek&sid=acdQ2p_Fe8yc

Third, an article by Salil Tripathi in THE GUARDIAN dated January 27, 2006 titled "Merging Markets." Excerpts:

>>
If you are still sceptical about India's emergence as a major global economic power, you should have seen the long queue at the Central Sports hotel off Davos's main promenade last night. It was India's Republic Day, and some of the most senior executives in the world were waiting patiently for overworked attendants to take their coats, hats and bags so they could enter the crowded hall. Inside, you'd have thought you were at Churchgate station in Mumbai during peak hours, except that you were surrounded by people who'd never be seen using public transport.
<<

>>
The links between India and China are old. In his latest book, The Argumentative Indian, Nobel laureate Amartya Sen writes: "The intellectual links between China and India, stretching over two thousand years, have had far-reaching effects on the history of both countries, yet they are hardly remembered today.... Some two thousand years ago the consumption habits of Indians, particularly of rich Indians, were radically influenced by innovations from China. [And] while China was enriching the material world of India two thousand years ago, India was exporting Buddhism to China." Maybe history is repeating itself. Indians are consuming more products made in China, but are they exporting Indian ideas to China now? Here's a hint: there is a big poster at the Zurich airport, inviting investors to India. It describes India as "the world's fastest-growing free market democracy". Maybe that's an idea worth exporting.
<<

For more see  http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,1696579,00.html

A fourth -- an article by Anand Giridharadas in THE INTERNATIONAL HERALD TRIBUNE -- dated January 26, 2006, is titled, "China vs. India: A battle of ideas." An excerpt:

>>
The effectiveness of the Chinese model is evident in its annual growth rate, which is near 10 percent, but its sustainability is questionable. "For the next two decades, Indian society is predictable and the democratic framework predictable," said Yasukuni Enoki, the Japanese ambassador to India, in an interview. "How about China? Two decades? Really we cannot draw a predictable picture."
<<

For more, click: http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/01/26/news/rindemo.php

Cheers,

Ram Narayanan
US-India Friendship



Powered By PanWebMailer Version 2.0 © 2004-2005

Terrorists Released to help Soz--New Cabinet Minister--Will PM explain?

jan 30th

saifuddin soz was the man behind a couple of clever things.

1. his daughter was 'kidnapped' by kashmiri 'boys' and so the govt released lots of terrorists to get her 'release'

2. his single vote brought down the bjp government after their 13 days

so naturally he is a union minister now.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: rv
Date: Jan 30, 2006 8:59 PM
Subject: Terrorists Released to help Soz--New Cabinet Minister--Will PM explain?
To:

MOST IMPORTANT-- TERRORISTS RELEASED TO HELP SOZ-- NEW CABINET MINISTER--

Prof. Saifuddin Soz has become a minister-- after campaining against the constitutional authority of India namely census commissioner and supporting Hizbul for boycotting the census in J & K.

Will Soz at least now reveal how many terrorists of LeT or Hizb were released to secure his daughters' release from the abductors as per press release of CBI dated 28-11-2000 shown below.?

More important is regarding the so called culprit Bhat-- Where is he now? Was he not helped by Soz? Was the abduction a drama to get dreaded terrorists released? The nationa needs answers--

Mr. Manmohan owes it to the nationa to get /give that explanation  and provide the names of the dreaded terrorists released--since it  will also reveal the havoc they created later--

Will the honorable members of Parliament raise this issue?
RV




Press Release

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

NEW DELHI 28.11.2000

ACCUSED CONVICTED IN A J& K KIDNAPPING CASE:


The Central Bureau of Investigation has secured conviction against Md. Yasin Bhat for kidnapping Ms Nahida Imtiaz daughter of Shri Saifuddin Soz, former Member of Parliament.

The CBI investigation revealed that the accused Md.Yasin Bhat and others had kidnapped Ms Nahida Imtiaz daughter of Shri Saifuddin Soz, ex-Member of Parliament on 27.2.1991 and demanded release of 5 militants of Jammu Kashmir Student Liberation Front (JKSLF) in custody. Few militants had to be released in exchange of the release of Ms Nahida Imtiaz. She was released by kidnappers on 8.3.1991.

The investigation of this case was entrusted by Govt.of India to CBI on the request of the Govt. of J&K. The CBI filed the charge sheet in the Designated Court on 18.12.1992 after completing the investigation.

The Designated Court Jammu has convicted Md. Yasin Bhat for the offences punishable under Sections 364, 365 & 120-B IPC and under section 3 TADA (P) Act and sentenced him to undergo six years Rigorous Imprisonment with a fine of Rs.13,000/-.

The CBI had investigated number of sensitive cases of J&K and they are presently under trial in the Court.



--
RV

china's aircraft carrier

jan 30th

http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/01/30/business/carrier.php

and india is letting the chinese govt build the deep-water port at vizhinjam, trivandrum! i wonder whom and how much the chinese paid off to get this contract, which means the completion of their containment of india from a naval perspective.

negroponte - microsoft circus on cheap computers for the poor

jan 30th

this is even more entertaining now. i feel negroponte's initiative is mostly grandstanding, but i also see that he has now persuaded india to chip in $100 million. when last heard, india had been smart enough to keep away from this boondoggle.

now comes microsoft with its FUD and promises of something better just down the road.

here's my analysis.

1. microsoft is pissed off that negroponte wants to use linux
2. so they come up with this great new pie in the sky idea of cellphone-computing
3. they will put one underemployed product manager on it to keep producing some PR material but wont waste any actual technical effort on it
4. negroponte's initiative will die because everyone gets hooked onto the microsoft idea
5. microsoft will quietly drop the cellphone-computing idea

this is exactly what microsoft did to kill of handwriting recognition pioneer Go computing years ago. someone had a parody about 'microsoft kitchen' somewhere

i love this battle of the marketeers :-) both of them high on hype and low on content.

i believe negroponte's idea -- which was dubious to begin with -- is now truly dead.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/30/technology/30gates.html?_r=1&th&emc=th

ps. to darkstorm, you were complaining about no tech stories. here's one. and no, you were not the person i was referring to as a lurker, it was someone who did a shoot-and-scoot, one-time post abusing someone and then disappearing

sandhya jain on the man who would be king

jan 30th

how appropriate on gandhi's birthday! yet another white man to become king of india.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sandhya

Organiser-Rahul-29January2006

Rahul: no ray of hope

Sandhya Jain 

 

Rahul Gandhi's de facto anointment at the Hyderabad plenary session of the Congress, under the watchful eyes of his mother and Congress President Sonia Gandhi, sent political and media acolytes into the throes of a self-induced hysteria and hyperbole. Even though the truth is that the scandal involving the surreptitious de-freezing of Ottavio Quattrocchi's London bank accounts which contained Rs. 21 crores of Bofors payoff money forced Ms. Sonia Gandhi to postpone bringing Rahul Gandhi into the Congress Working Committee, senior party leaders and media mandarins behaved as if his "reluctance" to assume a formal position in the party was the last word in self-abnegation.

 

One has only to recall his informal interview with Tehelka last year, where he bragged that he could have become prime minister at the age of 25, to realize that his humility is borne out of necessity. The parallel that comes to mind is of the Sonia Gandhi who falsely claimed the support of 272 MPs to President K.R. Narayanan finally staking her claim before President APJ Abdul Kalam, only to be told she could not be sworn in, and cloaking her humiliation in dramatic renunciation.

 

            Rahul's supposedly off-beat speech reflects the yawning chasm between Congress' top leadership and the people of India, which is the reason for the party's dwindling fortunes in state after state. The demeaning drama that preceded Rahul's speech failed to disguise the reality that the Congress' future leader is a youth without vision, without passion for India, and without any knowledge about Indian society and its grand civilizational ethos. He is in politics because his family background ensures him a seat in Parliament.  

 

To his credit, Rahul is canny enough to realize that he cannot shoulder the burden of the party's expectations alone, since he does not empathize with the Indian people, and hence he cannot emerge as a significant vote-catcher, on the lines of Indira Gandhi. This is equally true of Congress president Sonia Gandhi, and that is why Congress performs poorly in states where it lacks credible local leaders. That is why Rahul has called for rebuilding the party leadership in states where Congress is weak, which encompasses most of north India.

 

Rahul Gandhi is wise not to blame communal and religion-based parties for the decline of the Congress, as this will only alienate the sections of society that vote for these parties and whom Congress is trying to woo. Besides, as Congress in the guise of the UPA is only pursuing communal and religion-based politics, which is excessively biased towards the minorities, the party should introspect why if still fails to impress voters. Thus, while Rahul may be right that Congress has the largest number of young leaders, the sad fact is that most of these so-called leaders are merely, like him, the scions of political families, who have "inherited" the family seat. They are Babalog, not innovative and energetic youth who will take the country forward in any area.

 

Indeed, their disconnect with the people of India was powerfully underlined by Rahul when he made his appeal to the youth leaders: "let us move into a battlefield, the heart of India. Let us go to the villages, and the towns and the cities. Let us go to universities and schools. Let us move away from the corridors of power. Let us cement the links with our people. Let us listen to wisdom of our great people. Let us understand their concerns and their aspirations. Let us become leaders by listening and by learning and by working rather than through post and positions." Biased media bards have gone into raptures over this speech, yet this is precisely, to my mind, the segment that best betrays the complete alienation of Congress' city-breed MPs with the India that breathes outside the large megapolises. Rahul has let the cat out of the bag – Congress has no grassroots youth leaders at all!  

 

As for the Congress ideology, I wish we could know what it is, other than minority appeasement and fostering of divisive tendencies in the larger Hindu community. The late Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi wrote a piffling verse in memory of Bahadur Shah Zafar when he visited Rangoon, but his horrible gaffe came when he allowed a scriptwriter from Mumbai to make him mouth the infamous "nani yaad dila denge" for Pakistani President Gen. Zia-ul-Haq. 

 

Rahul's script writer has asked him to tell him slavish audience that his religion was the Indian flag. This is simply dishonest. Given the Congress penchant, especially under the UPA regime, to exploit religion for electoral purposes; given the Roman Catholic background of his mother Sonia and the fact that his sister has married into a Christian family; and his own foreigner girlfriend having a Catholic background, Rahul should not have dissimulated about his religion after himself raising the issue.

 

But having raised the issue, he owes the nation the truth. He has to tell us whether or not he roots himself in the ancient dharma of India, respects its civilizational ethos and feels duty bound to uphold and protect it, or whether he feels that missionaries have the right to freely enter the country, demean its native traditions, and undertake conversions by any means. Since many western countries consider conversions as an instrument of foreign policy and have huge budgets reserved for evangelical activities, which impinge upon India's national sovereignty in sensitive regions like the north-east, the Congress party's heir apparent should have used to first opportunity to clarify his position on conversion to foreign faiths, funded and monitored by foreign governments.

 

END

 

like the good old pre-partition days

jan 30th

slippery slope: separate electorate, separate everything, finally separate 'moplahstan'.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: siva
 
 
Reserved constituencies urged for Muslims till law change
Monday January 30 2006 09:42 IST

THANJAVUR: Noting that provision of representation in proportionate to the population of each community is the 'only right way' to enable the respective communities get their due share in Parliament and Legislative Assemblies, Tamil Nadu Thowheed Jamaat (TNTJ) has urged the Centre to amend the legislation for conducting elections so as to provide due representation to Muslims in Parliament and Legislative Assemblies in proportionate to their population.

A resolution to this effect was adopted during the 'Muslims' rights retrieval conference' held in Kumbakonam on Sunday.

TNTJ also urged the Centre to create 'reserve constituencies' for Muslims similar to that of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes until such amendment is brought.

Stating that Muslims constituted 20 percent of the population of the country, the conference urged the Centre to bring legislation so as to provide 20 percent reservation in educational institutions including the premier educational institutions like IIT, IIM, and employment opportunities both at government and private agencies to Muslims in proportionate to their population.

Reminding the Congress, DMK and PMK parties, the constituents of UPA government at Centre, of their electoral promise and the same in their election manifesto during the parliamentary election to provide reservation for Muslims in education and employment, the conference urged the parties to keep their promise without any further delay before the announcement of the date for Assembly elections.

Rejecting the argument that the litigation with regard to the provision of 69 per cent reservation which is pending before the Supreme Court is a deterrent for providing any reservation to Muslims in Tamil Nadu, TNTJ urged the State government to provide Muslims their due share within the 50 per cent general reservation without increasing the percentage of reservation exceeding the 69 percent.

This arrangement will in no way affect the litigation pending before the Supreme Court, the resolution said.

Rejecting the observation of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh that provision of reservation based on religion is unconstitutional, the conference argued that the legislation was banned by the High Court on technical grounds.

"Had the provision of reservation to any community based on religion been unconstitutional, the governments in Karnataka and Kerala would not have provided reservation to muslims" the resolution added.

It also urged the state government to follow the footsteps of Karnataka and Kerala and provide reservation to Muslims. Several other resolutions were passed during the conference.

Earlier, a massive rally was taken out by the activists of Tamil Nadu Thowheed Jamaat.

TNTJ State president P Jainullabuddin flagged off the rally, which started from near Asur bye pass road in Kumbakonam and meandered through the main roads before culminating at the conference venue on Gandhiadigal Salai.

TNTJ State general secretary S M Parker, secretary M Jaffer Ali, Deputy General Secretary A S Alauddin also participated.

MSN News: Experts: Map of `Chinese Columbus` is fake

january 30th

i did not expect anything different.

now wait until they 'find out' that zheng he was actually the first person to explore the moon :-)

they make so much noise about this guy, what is pathetic is that all he did was sail around a bit.

on the other hand, raja raja chola in 1017CE sent an *expedition* with hundreds of ships all the way to sumatra and defeated the maritime srivijaya empire! that was the *greatest naval feat in history* until the invention of steamships and metal hulls and big naval guns in the 19th century! bigger than the famed spanish armada, probably the first thing that eclipsed it was the russo-japanese war and the victory of admiral tojo in the yellow sea in 1905.

not surprisingly, given the marxist-oriented history of india that we learn, there is no mention of this in india's textbooks.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: sa

MSN News


Check out the following link for more details.

Experts: Map of `Chinese Columbus` is fake

Personal Message:
Hi Rajeev, This gives prrof to the Chiniese to colonize North America:).

chinese human rights (sic)

jan 30th

appropriate on gandhi's birthday. even though he was not exactly god (as indian textbooks claim), he was a marketing genius and did highlight the plight of the poor.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: G
 
Chinese lawyer hits out at regime
 
 
Defiant human rights activist Gao Zhisheng tells Jonathan Watts in Beijing that Europe must not 'honeymoon' with a state that murders millions

Sunday January 29, 2006
The Observer


 
France, Germany and other states that have coddled up to the Communist dictatorship in Beijing will one day have to answer to the Chinese people, one of the country's leading civil rights activist has told The Observer.

Gao Zhisheng, a firebrand lawyer who has defended hundreds of victims of torture and persecution, said the Communist party was responsible for more deaths than the Nazis, but Western governments turned a blind eye because they were desperate to trade with the world's fastest growing economy.

'When the Nazis slaughtered Jews, the outside world condemned them,' he said. 'But the Communist party has taken the lives of 80 million people, 13 times more than the death toll among the Jews, yet the world says nothing.'

......

Sunday, January 29, 2006

the 'brown peril' argument from white guys

jan 29th

interesting. for this white guy, it's ok if the chinese come in and do hostile takeovers. but a british company with an indian at the head, oh no, that's pretty bad. so indians are 'untouchable' still.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ku

 
Oh oh...Here's the "how dare a brown man excel" speech!
 
I'm sure Mr. Mittal anticipated this. If he didn't then he's pretty dim.



Saturday, January 28, 2006

Hindu Leadership: In Defence of Hindu Gurus - Francois Gautier Jan. 9th 2006

jan 28th

francois minces no words. he's quite right, too. we're in a life-and-death battle. hinduism is the last obstacle left standing in the way of semitic ideologies. buddhism they know how to wipe out, eg. afghanistan, uzbekistan, pakistan, bangladesh, and now south korea and possibly china too. simple method: destroy the buddhist centers and that's the end of buddhism, eg. nalanda.

but they had not until recently figured out how to uproot hinduism. now they have found a fatal weakness: all those marxist converts and their fellow travelers who claim to be 'hindus' when in reality they are card-carrying semitics based on their acceptance of the semitic death cult known as marxism. (literally worships dead people, like the embalmed lenin and mao).

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sucheta

Respected elders and dear friends:
 
Namaste.  Please excuse my long letter and intrusion.
I believe a general lack of leadership is the prime challenge facing the global Hindu community from microcosm to macrocosm today.
Attached article by Mr. Francois Gautier highlights this issue one more time.
 
Gautier ji, in his following article has made an excellent suggestion of having several most favored contemporary Hindu gurus to make a
Council of Hindu Gurus which could meet perhaps three to four times in an year and issue edicts to bind all Hindus together. 
Now, at onset this may sound outrageous to our Hindu sensibilities. But, if we can just take a step back at history and see things from
a different perspective, maybe it will give us a different view and hopefully open up new possibilities:
After Industrial Revolution when human beings left villages for greener pastures of urbanity, they not only left their families, homes
and livelihoods behind but also A SENSE OF BELONGING. This vacuum was cleverly filled by Christianity, Communism and especially
Islam at various periods as these ideologies provided a safety net away from the extended families left behind in the villages. When
Hindus started moving away from villages mostly in 20th century, although they adjusted very well into the new milieu of cities and
other countries there was no structured safety net of extended family or social religions to rescue from adversities of life in general
and life in foreign lands in particular.  Hinduism is a religion of personal faith, spirituality and divinity-within and not much of social 
structuring religion that is why its loose general social structure. Because a Hindu does not find a safety net of an extended family or
even an atmosphere conducive to being a Hindu, an expatriate Hindu often feels that he belongs somewhere else that has been left in
the deep distant past which is unreachable and so there is a sense of longing and helplessness.  Whereas a Muslim, a Communist or a 
Christian or even a secular Hindu (who is Hindu only for namesake) has no qualms about his identity or sense of belonging. 
 
The Hindu Swaminarayan sampradaya is successful because it fills this particular void of 'belonging' for the Hindus away from their homes. 
The Swadhyay paripar, which is another success story but works the other way, by providing an extended family structure for Hindus who
are primarily still in the villages.  We can learn from Hindu success stories... and there are surely more.. and look beyond for models.
A recent meet in Mumbai of 80 plus Shankaracharyas and Mahamandaleshwars from all over India with 400 of their close associates
was a great initiative taken in the direction of 'Hindu Leadership' by Swami Dayananda Sarasvati of the Arsh Vidya Gurukulam, Mangalore
and Pennsylvania. This meet was covered by Hinduism Today.  Rest of the Hindu community needs to plug into this debate.
 
We in the USA can go on debating, petitioning, forwarding, appreciating and criticizing ALL that is happening here and in India...
while time is running out and for Hindus the world is getting worse by day. It is time for action.
 
Given the democratic nature of Hindu Dharma, it is difficult to say how Hindus can be led but a strong, assertive leadership indeed ... 
is the need of the hour.  Any brainstorming on this burning issue will be of great benefits to all.
 
Bhavdiya -
Sucheta Maheshwari
 
********************************************************************************************************************
 
In Defense of Hindu Gurus
- by Francois Gautier

When Marxist leader Brinda Karat attacks Swami Ramdev, she is not
attacking Ramdev in particular, she is attacking Hinduism in general.
This guru or that guru makes no difference to her; she is against all gurus.
 
Other gurus might think they are safe, that Ramdev committed some sin
for which he is paying. But one of them will be the next in the line of fire!
 
Hindu gurus are all vulnerable in today's India: The Kanchi Shankaracharya
has already been hit. So has Satya Sai Baba. Amritanandamayi has to live
under the constant shadow of a hostile Kerala Communist-dominated
government. Dhirendra Brahmachari is dead and Sri Sri Ravi Shankar is
periodically targeted as the 'Guru of the rich', the 'Glib Godman' etc.
 
May I be forgiven my arrogance, but what Indian gurus have to
understand is that for Indian Communists, Hinduism is the Number 1
enemy. Mao called religion 'the opium of the people'. But for Indian
Communists, what stands between their ambition for absolute power in
India (and eventually the triumphant return of Communism in the world
-- as Indian Communists believe) is the hold Hinduism has in the hearts
of the rural people of India, who constitute 80 per cent of this country.
 
Yet, the humble farmer from Uttar Pradesh to Tamil Nadu has a natural
understanding of the universality of God, who takes many names throughout
the ages who could be Buddha, Jesus Christ, Ram or Mohammad.
This humble farmer possesses the knowledge that there is a something
deeper than the skin and the mind, and a life beyond death. This
knowledge is inbred, it is not in his head, not even in his heart, but
in his or her genes from generation to generation.
 
Of course, the English-speaking media is too happy to oblige Brinda
Karat and come down hard on gurus with all kind of accusations.
Before Ramdev, they came down on the Kanchi Shankaracharya, before him
on Osho, before him on Dhirendra Brahmachari. You can even go back to
Sri Aurobindo, who was accused in the early 1900s by the moderate
Congress-controlled press to be a 'fanatic', when he was only demanding
total independence from the British long before Gandhi took it up.
Accusations against Hinduism of superstition, brainwashing, ritualistic
ignorance, date back from British missionaries and have been taken up
today by the Communists. Yet, Hinduism -- at least the Hinduism which
goes beyond the rituals and becomes universal spirituality -- has
nothing to do with superstition and conmanship: it is all about
science, knowledge and light.
 
Look at Pranayama, a science that has known for thousands of years how
to harness breath and use it for controlling the mind, for a better,
more healthy, more spiritualised life. If you read Osho's books today,
you find a lot of solid common sense, wisdom, even light.
 
Satya Sai Baba cannot have millions of disciples from the most humble
to the Presidents of India without 'something' which is beyond
superstition. So goes for Amritanandamayi, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar,
Ramdev, or Guruma of Ganeshpuri.
 
And why should Brinda Karat target Ayurveda, the most ancient medical
system in India still in practice, the first medicine to realise 3,000
years ago that plants and minerals offer the best cure, that many
illnesses have a psychosomatic origin, the first to practice plastic
surgery on patients?
 
In India today, every third shop is an allopathic medical shop, whose
profits go to Western multinationals (hello Mrs Karat!) at a time when
Ayurvedic medicine is becoming increasingly popular in Western
countries, after being disillusioned by antibiotics and other
heavy-handed medicines.
 
We are witnessing an interesting phenomenon in India today. Some
Communists, some Christians, some Muslims and some Congress leaders --
all of whom have nothing in common and often hate each other are united
against Hinduism and Hindu leaders.
 
In contrast, look at the Hindus: Swami Ramdev himself criticised Sri
Sri Ravi Shankar live on television, advising his followers not to
practice Art of Living breathing techniques. During the tsunami relief
operations in Nagapattinam, disciples of Amritanandamayi and Sri Sri
Ravi Shankar nearly came to blows over who would give relief to whom,
instead of networking and uniting their efforts.
 
And who came to the rescue of Osho when he was maligned to death, or
Dhirendra Brahmachari when the entire press came down on him, or Satya
Sai Baba, when he was slandered, or the Shankaracharya when he was
thrown into jail, or Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, when Javed Akhtar accused him of
coming 'from a cave to live in a palace' (and not from a palace to a cave like
 the Buddha)? None of the previously mentioned. Yet, Indian politicians can
commit any crime, have any number of court cases against them, and they
still end up as Union ministers and get positive press coverage.
 
The greatest curse of Hinduism throughout the ages has been its disunity
-- and more than that -- its betraying each other. The British did not conquer
India, it was given to them by its warring Hindu princes, jealous of each other.
The same is true of Islam: the last great Hindu empire, that of Vijaynagar,
was betrayed to the Muslims by the Lingayats.
 
I know there is something mysterious and unfathomable in the
manifestation of the Divine upon earth, and that each guru has a
defined task to fulfill and that the combined task of all the gurus may
solve the great puzzle that is this ignorant and suffering earth.
Thus, it may not be necessary for each guru to communicate with each
other. But nevertheless, it is of the greatest urgency today that Hindu
leaders unite to save Hinduism, rather than 'each one for his own' that
we see today.
 
The Catholics have their Pope and his word is binding on all Catholics.
Muslims have Prophet Mohammed's words and that binds all of Islam
together. Indian Communists have the words of Marx and Lenin, even if
it has become irrelevant in Russia, Germany, and also in China. But the
poor Hindus have nobody to refer to, so as to defend themselves.
Yet, if you take the combined people power of Satya Sai Baba,
Amritaanandamayi, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, Swami Ramdev, Guruma of
Ganeshpuri, the Shankaracharya of Kanchipuram, and so many others I
cannot mention here, it runs in hundreds of millions.
 
Again, in all humility and conscious of the limitation of mind compared
to some of these great gurus whom I have met, I propose that a Supreme
Spiritual Council, composed of at least seven of the most popular Hindu
leaders of India, be constituted, maybe under the leadership of Sri Sri
Ravi Shankar, the most travelled of all these, the one who has disciples
and teachers of all religions, both from India and the West.
It should be a non-political body, and each group would keep its 
independence but nevertheless. It could meet two three times a year and
issue edicts, which would be binding on 850 millions Hindus in India
and one billion over the world.
 
Then and then only can this wonderful spirituality which is Hinduism,
this eternal knowledge behind the outer forms, the wisdom to understand
this mad earth and its sufferings, be preserved for the future of
India, and for the future of humanity.
 
I bow down to each of these gurus mentioned above and to all those not
mentioned, to Swami Vivekananda, the initiator of modern Hinduism, to
Sri Aurobindo, the great avatar of the supramental, and to all the
great gurus who have graced over the ages, this wonderful and sacred
land which is India and beseech them to hear my prayer:
 
Hindus leaders, unite, if you want eternal Dharma to survive.

==============================================================================

 

Older civilisation than Indus found

jan 28th
 


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: siva
Subject: Older civilisation than Indus found
To: Rajeev Srinivasan <rajeev.srinivasan@gmail.com>

 
How much more evidence does these nazis witzel & co need to prove that the aryan invasion turned migration that is waiting  to be named tourism fantasy of Chrisitan lunatics did not happen.
 
 
 
Older civilisation than Indus found
Vadodara, Jan 21: Recent excavations in parts of Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Pakistan have made the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) believe that a developed civilization possibly existed in the region in the 6th millennium BC, assumed to be older than the Indus valley civilisation.

According to ASI Director Dr B R Mani, the civilisation, believed to be much older than the Indus civilisation of the second and third millennium BC, stretched from Iran in the west to North Bengal in the east.

Dr Mani, who is here to attend a two-day international seminar on 'Magan (the present Oman) and Indus civilisation,' said till now the Indus and Harappan were considered to be amongst the world's earliest civilizations, but the relicts found during the recent excavations provided some evidence regarding existance of about 7,000-year-old civilization.

''Excavations at Lahuradeva site in Uttar Pradesh, Mehergadh in Pakistan and Haryana have led to recovery of pottery, cultivated rice and other artefacts dating back to that period,'' the ASI director said, adding that further research and excavations were on not only by the ASI but also by concerned state agencies and different universities.

Bureau Report

Britain to discuss Russian Harassment of Hindus at EU summit: Foreign Minister Douglas Alexander

jan 28th
 
where are the indian govt and the marxists? obviously not worried about hindu rights.
 
and, oh, to the lurker who claimed the hare krishnas are a cult, well there are plenty of cults doing extremely well, for instance, the madonna cult seen in velankanni, not to speak of the cults operated by oral roberts, pat robertson, and a host of others. go fix them before maligning hindu groups.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hindu Forum Office <info@hinduforum.org>
Date: Jan 27, 2006 11:15 AM
Subject: Britain to discuss Russian Harassment of Hindus at EU summit: Foreign Minister Douglas Alexander
To: info@hinduforum.org

 

British Parliamentarians have filed an Early Day Motion at the House of Commons to discuss the harassment of Russian Hindus. We urgently need more MPs to sign up and support the Early Day Motion in the British Parliament.

 

PLEASE THEREFORE WRITE TO YOUR LOCAL MP AND ASK THEM TO SUPPORT THIS MULTI-PARTY EDM.  You can find out who your local MP is by visiting: http://www.parliament.uk/directories/hciolists/clomps.cfm.

 

You can find email addresses for some MPs from:

http://www.parliament.uk/directories/hciolists/alms.cfm

 

Alternatively, you can write to them at the House of Commons using the following address: House of Commons, Palace of Westminster, London SW1A 0AA.

 

You can check which MPs have signed up to the EDM by checking: http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=29869&SESSION=875

 

Regards,

 

Ramesh Kallidai

Secretary General

Hindu Forum of Britain

 

 

Britain to discuss Russian Harassment of Hindus at EU summit: Foreign Minister Douglas Alexander

 

26 January 2006 – While acknowledging that Hindus in Russia face difficulties in practising their faith freely, Foreign Minister Douglas Alexander has assured the House of Commons on 25th January that the inability to establish a permanent place of worship for Hindus will be discussed with Russian officials at the EU as part of Britain's ongoing dialogue with Russia. The Foreign Minister was responding to a written question raised by Conservative MP James Clappison requesting the Foreign Secretary's assessment of the treatment of Hindus in Russia and the effect on the community of the loss of the Hindu temple in Moscow

In response, Foreign Minister Douglas Alexander had responded by saying, "The Hindu community, like a number of other religious communities have faced difficulties freely practicing their faith in Russia . These include the inability to establish a permanent place of worship in Moscow since the demolition of the Hindu temple in 2004. We raise the issue of religious freedom during regular EU and bilateral contact with the Russian Government. We will continue to monitor this and other religious freedom issues in Russia and raise them as appropriate in the course of our ongoing dialogue."

Earlier, a multi-party Early Day Motion led by Labour MP Ashok Kumar expressed Parliamentary support for the Defend Russian Hindus campaign and regretted the intolerance shown towards Russian Hindus manifest as denial to establish a place of worship.

 

The Hindu Forum of Britain has urged MPs from all political parties to support the Early Day Motion in response to the Defend Russian Hindus Campaign launched by Hindu organisations from UK, America, Canada , Africa , India and Australia. The campaign was launched on 18th January by parliamentarians Ashok Kumar MP, James Clappison MP and Lord Dholakia to highlight the plight of Russian Hindus.

 

"The crux to the issue", said Lord Dholakia, "is that Russian Hindus were given a temple which was demolished to make way for a commercial complex and were then promised a piece of land to build another temple. This has now been taken back and Hindus in Russia have no place to worship."

 

"Some members of the Russian Orthodox Church had orchestrated mass protests and started a misinformation campaign against Hindus in the Russian media," explained Ramesh Kallidai, secretary general of the Hindu Forum of Britain. "Many Hindus have and still are being victimised, threatened, bullied and even beaten and subjected to violence."

 

 Last month Archbishop Nikon of the Orthodox Church had described Lord Krishna as an "evil demon, the personified power of hell, opposing God", and sparked worldwide condemnation. The Mayor of London Ken Livingstone had also shown his concern for the harassment of Russian Hindus by discussing the matter with the visiting Mayor of Moscow Yuri Luzhkov on 15 th January, when he handed over letters of protest from the Hindu Forum of Britain and other organizations.

 

British Parliamentarians will be seeking a meeting with the Foreign Secretary Jack Straw to discuss the issues faced by Russian Hindus and lead a delegation to meet the Russian Ambassador in the UK. On 18th January, members of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, Muslim Council of Britain, and the Catholic Bishops Conference had joined hands with Hindu organizations to unanimously call for more respect and tolerance to allow Russian Hindus the same right to a place of worship as other communities.

Ends    

For more information contact Ramesh Kallidai on 07915 383 103 or 07867 837 241 or Sanjay Mistry on 07810 368 772

 

Editor's Notes:

1.           Full text of the EDM put before the House by Ashok Kumar MP: That this House notes with concern the denial of a place of worship for the Hindu community in Moscow as a result of the retraction by the Moscow City Government of an offer of land which was to be made available for the construction of a new temple; further notes the intolerance shown towards Hinduism in certain quarters in Russia; regrets the effect of this on individual Hindus wishing to peacefully follow their faith and the wider implications for religious toleration in Russia; and expresses its support for the Defend Russian Hindus campaign.

2.           Full text of the White Order Paper on 23 January 2006 by James Clappison MP: 190 MR James Clappison (Hertsmere): To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what assessment he has made of (A) treatment of the Hindu community in Russia and (b) the effect on the community of the loss of the Hindu temple in Moscow (45227).

3.           Date Answered: 25 January 2006 by Mr Alexander: The Hindu community, like a number of other religious communities have faced difficulties freely practicing their faith in Russia. These include the inability to establish a permanent place of worship in Moscow since the demolition of the Hindu temple in 2004. We raise the issue of religious freedom during regular EU and bilateral contact with the Russian Government. We will continue to monitor this and other religious freedom issues in Russia and raise them as appropriate in the course of our ongoing dialogue.

4.           The Defend Russian Hindus Campaign is supported by the Hindu Forum of Britain, the National Council of Hindu Temples UK, the Hindu Council UK, Vishwa Hindu Parishad UK, International Society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hindu Council of Australia, the Hindu American Foundation and the Hindu Conference Canada .

 

5.         The Hindu Forum of Britain is the representative umbrella body for British Hindus with formal membership of over 250 Hindu organisations from different regions and cultural backgrounds in Britain . The Hindu Forum of Britain has conducted some of the largest community consultation activities on behalf of the Hindu community to influence Government policy and runs a number of projects for Hindu youth, women, community safety and temples. For more information visit the HFB Website:   www.hinduforum.org.

 

If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, please send an email to admin@hinduforum.org with "unsubscribe" in the subject field.

 


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.23/242 - Release Date: 26/01/2006


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.23/242 - Release Date: 26/01/2006


[PINR] 27 January 2006: The U.S.-India Nuclear Deal: The End Game Begins

jan 28th
 
fairly good writeup on the current state of the indo-us agreement, which i personally continue to think is bunkum. india is giving away far too much and getting nothing in return. a very lop-sided treaty. india has to worry about energy security, but not at the cost of losing military security.

People Throng Carmelite Convent To Meet Nun With Stigmata

jan 28th

reminds me of a movie scene:

"sweet jesus, it's a miracle! i can see!"

-- conman eddie murphy in 'trading places' after being busted by the cops for pretending to be a blind, lame beggar

stigmata = hysteria

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Date: 27 Jan 2006 22:04:31 -0000
Subject: People Throng Carmelite Convent To Meet Nun With Stigmata
To: Rajeev.Srinivasan@gmail.com

Hi Rajeev, Some interesting news items. Regards, Sriram

People Throng Carmelite Convent To Meet Nun With Stigmata

By SAR NEWS

PONDICHERRY Jan 27 -- Hundreds of people flocked to the Carmelite convent in Pondicherry, January 17, seeking the blessings of Sister Therese Margaret said to have suffered the Holy Stigmata.

An external Sister from Thanjavur Carmel in Tamil Nadu, Sister Margaret was on a private visit to the Pondy monastery at the request of the local Carmelite nuns.

Sister Rosy, as she is popularly known, first suffered the passions of Jesus on Good Friday last year, it is said. She bled in the head from the agony of the crown of thorns, on the shoulders due the cross and the agony of the thongs on her back and in the palms and feet. Since then, she experienced the sufferings from Thursday night till Saturday.

Starting with swelling of the palms with bursting pain, the blood gushed out or oozed from the palms and feet on Friday during Mass or prayer time. On Sunday morning she was her normal self with no sign of suffering except for a scar where she bled.

The Church and the Carmelite authorities are silent on the matter. Some are even sceptical about the whole episode.

The bleeding signs appeared last on November 26 last year. However, the passions on the head, shoulders, back, palms and feet are said to continue but with no outward sign. The bloodstains in her clothes are said to smell sweet.

During her suffering, the Carmelite nun has had many visions of the Lord talking with Mother Mary and to her. Once the Lord asked Sister Rosy whether she preferred internal or exterior stigmata. She is said to have preferred internal passion.

Another time, Mother Mary cleaned dry the blood from her wounds when a nun helping her left for community prayer. "It is just shade of my sufferings," Jesus seems to have confided to Sister Rosy.

Sister Theresa is keen on meeting priests and nuns and motivating them to living up to their vocational vows. She is claimed to have pointed out the failings of individual priests and nuns.

For the lay people her message is – read the Bible daily, pray using the words of the Bible, frequent the Holy Mass, receive Communion and say the family prayer.

People come to her seeking counselling, prayer and healing.

Sister Therese Margaret is aged around 40 years and wears a big smile while blessing the people. This SAR News correspondent saw a number of priests and nuns among the people waiting to meet with the Carmelite nun.

Dalit Catholics Deserting Church In Hordes Has Missioners Worried

RAIPUR, Chhattisgarh (SAR NEWS) -- Missioners of Raipur Archdiocese in this Hindi belt have expressed deep concern over the Gada Dalits deserting the Catholic Church for fearing of losing government benefits.

"After some years, the Catholic Church in Fuljher area may disappear," says Abraham Narayan, a senior Gada catechist from Basna. The educated are joining the Protestant groups for employment reasons and the non-literate are becoming Hindus for fear of losing scholarships (made available under government reservations), he added.

The father of a nun, Mr. Narayan said, "It is a critical issue…because of it we are not able to practise our Faith."

When the matter was raised at the archdiocesan missionary meeting, January 11, Raipur Vicar General Father Augustine Varikyckal proposed to submit a memorandum to Christian Congress leader and former Chief Minister Ajit Jogi who was recently appointed chairman of the Scheduled Caste and Tribe Commission.

Many Gada Dalits in Fuljher (eastern) region of Raipur Diocese embraced Catholicism during drought in 1932. Some of them had been Mennonites and others were Hindus. Though officially there are about 10,000 baptised Gadas in the seven parishes of the archdiocese, lately many have either turned indifferent to religious practices after the American Catholic Relief Services stopped aid, or have joined other Christian denominations for material benefits.

Some others have returned to Hinduism in the Ghar Vapasi (returning home) programme organised by former Union Minister and Hindu propagandist Dilip Singh Judeo.

About six months back, 41 Catholic Gada families in Roopapli village under Basna parish formally became Hindus, as the local village authority belonging to the Bharatiya Janata Party refused to give them Hindu Dalit certificates and threatened to order an inquiry into Catholics receiving government concessions.

Punith Sona, a young Catholic says, he wants to participate in the Ghar Vapasi programme to get the Hindu Dalit caste certificate. The Gada Dalit from Baelmundi village, Baloda parish, is anxious since the sub-divisional magistrate (SDM) of Saraipali refused to issue him a Dalit certificate to avail government loan concession granted to Hindu Dalits.

"The SDM has been told that all Gadas of Baelmundi are Christians," the village assistant Sarpanch told SAR News.

"The problem (of not getting government grant) had been there earlier too, but it has become serious after the BJP came to power (in the state). They have posted their officials and workers in our region," said Father Mathew Valiyathara, the dean and parish priest of Pithora. He has been working in the region for more than 15 years.

Subhakar Gwal, another senior Gada catechist of Kutela parish said, Catholics from 3-4 villages did not turn up for the midnight Christmas Mass in their parish church at Kutela because they were told the government officials were spying in their villages.

Some villages have even asked the missioners not to come to their villages for offering the customary thanksgiving Mass after harvest.

"We feel bad because after so many years of our hard work, when it's time to bear fruit, people are abandoning the Faith," he added.

Christian Council Demands CBI Inquiry Into Forceful Conversion

BHUBANESWAR, Orissa (SAR NEWS) -- A premier Christian rights organisation has demanded an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation into forceful conversion of tribal Christians to Hinduism in this eastern Indian state.

The Global Council of Indian Christians alleged January 24 that the nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party and the fundamentalist Bajrang Dal activists were forcibly converting tribal Christians at gunpoint.

GCIC national convener Sajan K George told newspersons in the State capital that "forced conversion of tribal Christians into Hinduism in many parts of Orissa, particularly in western Orissa, be probed by the CBI as they are converted at a gun point by the radicals in clear violation of the Orissa Freedom of Religion Act."

CBI is the premier police agency of the Government of India with special thrust on anti-corruption work and special and economic crimes.

Mr. George alleged that the administrative machinery of the Orissa Government was being used by the radicals to intimate and convert the Christian people.

He said in Tumbai village under Gurundia police station in Sundargarh district, the tribal Christians were recently converted forcibly by the radicals. He accused former Union Minister and BJP State unit president Juel Oram of encouraging and funding the conversion of Christians into Hinduism in the state.

Mr. George said eight Christian families at Palsakutni village in Boudh district were evicted by Hindu fundamentalists who set ablaze their houses and belongings and threatened to kill them if they returned to the village. These panicked Christian families, he said, had taken shelter in dense forest since February 2005 even without bare necessities like food, clothing and medical treatment.

The GCIC convener accused the state government headed by Naveen Patnaik of ignoring the plight of the Christians. "The Christian families, who were assaulted in Kilipal and Kanimal villages in Jagatsinghpur district February 2004, are now facing starvation," he said.

 



This News is featured in Mangalorean.com
www.Mangalorean.com

california textbook hearing

jan 28th

did anybody attend the latest hearing in sacramento which i believe was yesterday? what happened?


Fwd: Baba Ramdev vs Vrinda Karat

jan 23rd

interesting how the left-wing media, realizing that swami ramdev had the upper hand and was trouncing brinda karat, all of a sudden became very quiet about it.

they had expected it to be a cake-walk like in the case of the kanchi acharya. but the dignified and courteous kanchi swamiji -- an intellectual -- was easy to defame partly because the state machinery was at their disposal because of jayalalitha's animosity.

in the case of swami ramdev, who has the gut instinct of a street fighter, the attack boomeranged on the marxists. the public -- the common man -- revolted against this attack on a man who had done no wrong other than promote indian/hindu culture. (of course that is the worst crime in the eyes of the marxists.) also, in this case, the yadav/OBC bonds worked against the marxists, as mulayam singh yadav, laloo prasad yadav et al rallied to the side of the yadav swami ramdev.

this whole play has the fingerprints of the vatican/baptists on them. attack the swamis of hinduism one by one. their attacks on the satya sai baba and mata amritananadamayi have so far not gotten them any dividends.

the attack on the kanchi swami succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. if hindus had any sense, there should have been huge riots, but there weren't.

the attack on ramdev boomeranged. it was clear that common people in the north would take to the streets if it was prolonged. therefore the marxist-christist alliance made a tactical withdrawal.

now they will be careful to only attack brahmin swamis, because the OBC swamis will retaliate in like terms, whereas the brahmins have become like the jews. whatever they do or dont do, they are condemned, and it is only a matter of time before it will be declared a crime to be a brahmin. they will be forced into visible dhimmi-hood (like forced to wear clothes that identify them -- like the jewish yellow star -- etc.)

lessons to be learnt by all those preaching intellectual solutions: they don't work when you are confronted by sophisticated minds using adharmic methods. the only thing that works is a response that scares them. for instance, the congressis, in particular the dynasty, never will say anything against mohammedans because they are scared they will send suicide bombers. if there is the FUD (fear uncertainty and doubt) that hindus will go for violence -- and it is this paranoia that comes out as continuous depiction of the RSS as violent in an excellent example of people projecting their own nature onto others -- they will become remarkably pliant.

a good example of chrisist cowardice was a bangalore christist boy who married a mohammedan girl. the mohammedans killed both of them brutally. there was not *a peep* from john dayal, sajan george, and all the other christist luminaries who pontificate all the time. no questions from the USCIRF either. moral: christists are pissing in their pants about mohammedans.

on the other hand, christists are on the rampage against hindus in kerala, the northeast etc because they know they can get away with it. there was the sustained rape of an OBC girl by a foreign missionary and his indian collaborators. result: no conviction. there were the murders of hindu priests by christist terrorists in the northeast. result: no conviction. therefore they are emboldened.

the point is that the credible threat of serious retaliation is the key to deterrence. this is the idea behind 'mutually assured destruction' which kept the soviets and yanks from nuking each other. unfortunately, even though the mullah-marxist-missionary alliance continually paints the RSS as seriously violent, they know the RSS is actually a bunch of really nice guys who simply want to serve humanity. why, even when a bunch of christist priests were drowning in bengal, the RSS rescued them. in gratitude, christist terrorists kidnapped and murdered RSS activists!

i asked an indian-american friend what were the great horrors perpetrated by the RSS. his answer was revealing: a) gandhi was killed by them, b) they *may* do something in the future, so they have to be oppressed!

a) this is slander, and the courts have exonerated the RSS of this
b) this is like the film minority report, what, pre-crime? and who decides what is a crime? n ram, no doubt. it is also an astonishing illustration of the extent to which repeated propaganda has worked.

in fact, the RSS and the rest of the indian right-wing are real pussy-cats compared to the christist right (eg. ku klux klan) or mohammedan (eg. taliban). they have actually done nothing terrible, but the general impression has been created that they have.

the time for samam, danam, and bhedam are over (although it is a good idea to get the mohammedans and christists to fight with each other. remember how the deendar anjuman tried to get the christists all worked up by attacking churches and the media immediately blamed hindus). it would be good to get the various christist cults fighting with each other too (they show a tendency to do that in kerala anyway). but the key is dandam. or at least the credible threat of dandam. this is what makes people behave and be good little boys.

for instance, the marxists were running rampant in north kerala killing hindus. when there were a few retaliatory killings, they quickly quietened down. they generally believe their own propaganda that hindus are meant to quietly die when marxists/mohammedans/christists attack them. if hindus resist, it is "communal violence". for instance, in maraad, kerala, there was "communal violence" in 2003 when hindus resisted mohammedan attacks on them. in 2004, mohammedans ambushed and hacked to death a bunch of hindus. that was "secularism", not "communal violence".

we have to understand what these terms mean:

"secularism" -- discrimination against hindus

"secular intervention" -- marxists/mohammedans/christists killing hindus

"communal violence" -- hindus refusing to die quietly during "secular intervention"

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Babu Suseelan



Vrinda Karat's oppressed and stifled  mindset was at its best when she
>issuedmeaningless and highly objectionable statements against Swami Ramdev.
>Indian Communists like Karat have distinguished themselves by the utmost
>lackof giftedness, by creative impotence and incapacity for thought. Their
>overt and covert hatred for India and Hindu culture was evident in Karat's
>pronouncement against Swami Ramdev. The Communists have entered into an
>alliance with the multinational corporations and Christian fundamentalist
>groups to destroy and malign Hindus and Hindu cultural ethos. While issuing
>pro-forma condemnation against Swami Ramdev, Vrinda karat and her fellow ilk
>have nothing to say about Jihadi terrorism, coercive religious conversion,
>and the economic exploitation of poor Hindus by the multi-national
>corporations.
>
>
>
>The more we understand how Communists think and function,  the less likely
>weare to be paralyzed by the shock of their behavior, and the less likely we
>are to be taken by their ingenious cunning and manipulation.
>
>Communism, Islam and Christianity are closed systems with rigid ideology.
>They oppose each other. But in India, they have established an unholy nexus
>to destroy our culture, social stability and spiritual heritage. Lately
>Communists, aligned with the multinational criminal organizations have been
>attacking Hindu social institutions and economic interest to please their
>slave masters. Most Hindus have no idea how ant-Indian the hardcore
>Communists truly are. The agenda of the unholy alliance has always been
>directed to attacking all aspects of our culture, tradition, economy,
>including undermining our military capability. Vrinda Karat and their fellow
>travelers are truly a Fifth Column at work in Bharat.
>
>Christian-Muslim-Corporate-Communist alliance is designed to wage a battle
>against Hindutva and Bharat. Vrinda Karat and her fellow hired coolies are
>counseled to perform their tasks in such a way not to expose the dark hidden
>hands. These Communist obscurantist desire to hold the masses in darkness.
>It is also a terrible mistake to think, that the Communist condemnation of
>Swami Ramdev signifies the condemnation of Jihadi terrorism, deceptive
>Christian conversion and importation of discarded western Christian values
>inthe name of Globalization. Anti-Hindutva has become so deeply enmeshed
>withthe communist radical obsession of ant-Indian phenomenon? It takes lots
>of different forms.
>
>The challenge we face today is daunting. But we must meet them and conquer
>them. If we don't, who will?
> babususeelan@hotmail.com


 

dell to manufacture in india

jan 28th

more manufacturing may come to india in the wake of the davos extravaganza

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1389993.cms


brahma: US strategy in Asia

jan 27th

the us' balancing act: try to keep every power 'contained'.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Brahma
Date: Jan 28, 2006 10:24 AM
Subject: US strategy in Asia
To: Rajeev Srinivasan <rajeev.srinivasan@gmail.com>

Hindustan Times, January 28, 2006

 

The heated Sino-Japanese rivalry eases US need to rope in India as an Asian balancer

 

America's martial arts

 

By BRAHMA CHELLANEY

 

 

With the war of necessity against terrorism getting fused with the US war of choice in Iraq, there has been fallout on Asian geopolitics. The Iraq quagmire has not only constricted US options vis-à-vis renegade states like North Korea and Iran but also helped a rising China to increase its strategic leeway and influence in Asia.

 

An emboldened Chinese leadership has stepped up nationalistic rhetoric. This has had the unintended effect of persuading Japan to jettison its doubts about US security commitments and reinvigorate its military relationship with America.

 

At the same time, despite Washington propping up and arming an India-hostile military dictatorship in Pakistan, New Delhi is cosying up to the US, with its foreign policy adding democracy and non-proliferation advocacy as central planks. India now promotes democracy and non-proliferation where the US wants, not where its interests demand. Being close to the US has also meant lavishing attention on its pet autocrats, as symbolised by the Indian mollycoddling of the Saudi king but the cold-shouldering of the Nepalese monarch.

 

India 's warm ties with Washington both mirror and spur a major shift in public opinion at home. Such ties also boost India's international profile. Yet, to avoid the pitfalls and better capitalise on these ties, India needs to absorb US strategic aims.

 

America's overarching aim is to safeguard its global primacy. In Asia, its central interest remains what it has been for long — the maintenance of a balance of power. During the Cold War, the US chose to maintain a balance by means of military alliances and forward bases in Asia. By the time the Cold War entered the second half, America designed its 'opening' to China to reinforce a balance by employing Beijing to countervail Soviet power. It also shored up Pakistan over the decades largely to counterbalance India.

 

Today, as China, India and Japan assert themselves in Asia, America's key strategic objective remains unchanged. It does not want any single power to dominate Asia or any region there. Its war on terror came handy in Asia to establish new US military bases.

 

The US is certainly concerned about China's aspiration to dominate Asia. But at present it shares greater interests with China than with India, such as on North Korea. The US and China, once allies of convenience, have now become partners tied by interdependence.

 

America depends on Chinese surpluses and savings to finance its super-sized budget deficits, while Beijing relies on its surging exports to the US to sustain its average 9.6% growth rate and subsidise its military modernisation. By ploughing more than two-thirds of its $819 billion foreign-currency reserves into dollar-denominated assets, China holds down US interest rates, props up the value of the dollar and finances American spending.

 

In return, it gains significant political leverage. The US tolerates a nearly $200-billion trade deficit with China largely because cheap Chinese-made goods help keep US inflation down. By outsourcing lower-cost manufacturing to China (and back-office work to India), the US economy can concentrate on high-value productivity.

 

For its part, Beijing will dare not behave towards the US the way it spits fire at Japan or condescendingly treats India. In fact, given the vast disparity in U.S.-China power, the Chinese approach to handling America's global primacy is a model of canny tactics — a calibrated balance of inconspicuous submission, modest resistance and circumspect competition.

 

The US and China are far from being enemies, and the basis of their future ties is open to all options — from amity to hostility. Any US balancing of China, if the need arose, will certainly not be in the Cold War model, given the US reliance on Chinese capital and China's own role as an engine for US economic growth. Indeed, the recrudescence of the Sino-Japanese historical rivalry not only makes such externally driven balancing gratuitous at this time but also helps reinforce America's role as the main arbiter in Asia.

 

Japan and China may not like the downward spiral in their relations to continue, but the vicious cycle bedevilling their ties offers no easy exit. In comparison, the Sino-Indian relationship, despite being racked by unresolved issues and the Chinese strategic squeeze of India, appears better managed only because the two sides have eschewed shrill rhetoric against each other.

 

America 's interests, other than playing the balancing game, lie in hedging its Asian options. Consequently, India has begun to attract greater US attention. However, any US need to rope in India as an Asian balancer has been mitigated by the emerging Sino-Japanese cold war. Through their heated rivalry, China and the economically mightier Japan will keep each other in check, without one gaining the upper hand over the other.  

 

That in turn means the US has less incentive to accommodate India. After failing to support India's bid for a Security Council permanent seat, the US is now shifting the nuclear deal's goalposts on issues that go far beyond the breeder programme. On offer is a second-class nuclear status to India at best — that too if New Delhi danced to the US foreign-policy tune. Had it wanted to build India as a counterweight to China, the US wouldn't be seeking to constrain Indian nuclear military capability even before India has acquired a minimal deterrent against Beijing.

 

Pakistan's uncompromising resolve to thwart India's regional pre-eminence also jibes well with the US balancing strategy. In the past, the US turned a blind eye to Pakistani proliferation for the same reason that China aided Islamabad's nuclear ambitions. Not only did it shield A.Q. Khan from arrest in Europe in 1975 and 1986, the CIA also had a likely hand in the disappearance of Khan's legal files from the Amsterdam court that convicted him, according to recent Dutch revelations.

 

More troubling is that the US has resumed the rearming of Pakistan with lethal, India-directed systems. The supply of 10 P3C Orion dual-purpose aircraft, for example, will arm Islamabad with the capability to monitor India's entire western naval flank down to the Indian Ocean. By seeking to also sell arms to India, the US wants to reap profits on both sides and step up leverage over New Delhi.

 

Equally revealing is that it is trying to market in India the very weapons it has presented Pakistan (like the F-16s, Orions and C-130s) or other arms that will leave this country both poorer by billions of dollars and unable to decisively defeat an aggressor. Through major bargaining chips — from Kashmir to military spares to nuclear energy — the US wishes to gain over India the kind of strategic influence it has secured over Pakistan. No US president will visit India without also going to Pakistan, though more visiting time will be lavished on the country where US businesses can make more money.

 

As Iraq testifies, America's strategic calculations do go awry. It failed to deter India's nuclear weaponisation. Today, it can only watch China's accretion of strength, Japan's political resurgence and Russia's increasing use of its energy weapon.

 

India is right to seek closer engagement with the US. But such engagement has to proceed with a clear appreciation of where mutual interests diverge. Moderation, pragmatism and subtlety should guide India's US policy, not sentiment, hyperbole or false expectation. In history, a nation's pursuit of friendly, mutually beneficial ties with a globally dominant power has rarely translated into securing a trustworthy friend.

upi: india's strategic challenges

jan 28th

mostly stem from having no strategic vision or goals.

http://news.monstersandcritics.com/southasia/article_1089632.php/India%60s_strategic_challenges

India's massive charm offensive at Davos World Economic Forum

jan 28th

i'd be far more pleased about this if i felt that the UPA is not looking for more payola scams bofors style. anybody who wants to invest in india will be getting squeezed by the powers that be.

from the tireless indo-us ties booster ram narayan

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ram
Date: Jan 27, 2006 11:08 PM
Subject: India's massive charm offensive at Davos World Economic Forum
To: rajeev.srinivasan@gmail.com

Dear Rajeev Srinivasan:

The two articles reproduced below, one from THE NEW YORK TIMES and the other from MARKET WATCH turn the spotlight on India's massive charm offensive to promote itself at the World Economic Forum at Davos as the next economic 
superstar -- as a democratic alternative to authoritarian China for the affections of foreign investors.

Cheers,

Ram Narayanan
US-India Friendship
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/26/business/worldbusiness/26india.html?emc=eta1

THE NEW YORK TIMES

'India Everywhere' in the Alps

By MARK LANDLER
Published: January 26, 2006 

DAVOS, Switzerland, Jan. 25 — Delhi swept into Davos on Wednesday, with an extravagant public relations campaign by India intended to promote the country as the world's next economic superstar, and as a democratic alternative to China for the affections of foreign investors.

There were few places one could go, on this first day of the World Economic Forum's annual meeting here, without seeing, hearing, drinking, or tasting something Indian. The organizers call the campaign "India Everywhere" and they appear to mean it literally.

"The last two years, we felt there was too much about China, and India wasn't being heard," said Ajay Khanna, the chief executive of the India Brand Equity Foundation, which is orchestrating the promotion. "This year, we decided to make a major effort to give India a voice."

There is little danger of India's being drowned out, with a 150-member delegation, including 3 cabinet ministers and 41 chief executives. Mr. Khanna estimated the total cost of the campaign and the travel expenses at $5 million. Never before, officials of the forum said, has a country mounted such an elaborate charm offensive at Davos.

"We're going to showcase the arrival of the global Indian entrepreneur," said Nandan M. Nilekani, the chief executive of Infosys Technologies, which grew to $2 billion in sales in 2005 from $120 million in 1999 and has come to symbolize India's vaulting ambitions.

The question is whether India's unspoken message — that it is another China — is credible. After all, China still grows faster than India, has attracted 10 times the foreign direct investment and has built a gleaming network of airports and highways that make India look ramshackle.

"There are a number of areas where people gloss over India's challenges," said Jim O'Neill, the head of global economic research at Goldman Sachs, citing India's inadequate education system and barriers to foreign ownership of Indian assets as significant weaknesses.

"It's starting to be tricky to find skilled workers there," Mr. O'Neill said. "India is also a very closed economy."

Goldman contributed to the euphoria about India, by projecting that its economy could be 50 times its current size by 2050, which would make it the world's third largest, after China and the United States.

But Mr. O'Neill said that when he ranked countries by the potential risks to their growth — everything from inflation to corruption — India ranked 97th in the world, behind Brazil and the Philippines.

Indian entrepreneurs concede their country has problems. Social tensions from mass migration and the fragility of the current government could disrupt development. Roads and airports remain woeful, and construction projects are often snarled in bureaucracy.

"If you want to make Barbie dolls, don't come to India," said Anand G. Mahindra, the head of one of India's largest conglomerates. "Because if you order one million of them, they'll probably be held up in traffic from Mumbai to the port," he said, using the post-colonial name for Bombay.

Still, India is beginning to enjoy China-like growth, expanding 8.1 percent from April to June 2005. Its gross domestic product will expand by an average of 6.1 percent a year from 2005 to 2010, according to Goldman.

Advertisements on buses here promote India as the world's "fastest-growing free-market democracy" — a not-so-subtle reference to China, which has done little to relax the grip of the Communist Party over society. India, by contrast, is a clamorous democracy, with 675 million eligible voters.

"Democracy is a big advantage for us," said Malvinder M. Singh, the president of Ranbaxy Laboratories, India's top drug company. "It is not the only advantage, but it is definitely one big advantage."

Mr. Singh, a 33-year-old with an M.B.A. from Duke University, said India's strength in chemistry had given its pharmaceutical industry an edge over that of China. While Chinese companies focus on raw materials, he said, Ranbaxy produces generic drugs and plans to expand its proprietary products.

Despite the constant comparisons to China, most Indians insist the two are not competing, and can both prosper. "I call it Chindia," joked Nikhil Meswani, the executive director of Reliance Industries.

With companies like Reliance, Ranbaxy and Infosys already global competitors, experts say India's further development will hinge largely on whether the government can loosen up the labor market, build decent roads and airports, and knock down hurdles to foreign investment.

India, for example, still prohibits Wal-Mart and Carrefour, Europe's largest retailer, from opening stores in the country. But this week, it announced that it would allow single-brand merchants, like Tommy Hilfiger, to open shops.

"I'm sure people in the government wanted it to be done in time for Davos," said Montek S. Ahluwalia, the deputy chairman of the Indian Planning Commission, "but it wasn't done for Davos."

India has left little else to chance in its courting of people here. It has organized daily news conferences and happy hours, as well as an art exhibit. For the gala ball, which will have an Indian theme, it is flying in chefs from 14 Taj luxury hotels to whip up Indian cuisine.

In their hotel rooms on Wednesday, participants found tiny iPods with Indian music recorded on them, and Pashmina stoles, described as a "gift from the Himalayas to keep you warm in the Alps."

Mr. Nilekani said he hoped the campaign would polish India's image and attract tourists, as well as some foreign investment. At a cost of $5 million, he noted, "we get a lot of bang for our buck."

____________________________________________ 

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?guid=%7B07E34799%2D72CC%2D4648%2D848C%2D46BCA05D34FC%7D&siteid=aolpf&dist=

MARKET WATCH

India strives to rival China
Asian giant struggling for more status in global community 

By Aude Lagorce, MarketWatch
Last Update: 11:04 AM ET Jan. 26, 2006

DAVOS, Switzerland (MarketWatch) -- Nothing illustrates better India's desire to rival the rising international status of China than the massive charm offensive India is mounting at the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum.

A huge Indian delegation consisting of 150 members -- including three cabinet members and 41 chief executives -- is using every opportunity to tell the movers and shakers of the global community gathered in the Alpine resort that India can be a profitable market for foreign investment and not just a service-sector economy.

But for all its recent economic achievements, India still has a long way to go in attracting the same degree of interest in the global community.

"I don't think India is competing with China yet," said John Williamson of the Institute for International Economics.

China and India may have huge populations (1.3 billion and 1.1 billion respectively), cheap labor and buoyant growth in common, but their recent burst onto the global economy can't be tracked down to the same factors.

China grew at between 8% and 10% in the last three years on the strength of its export manufacturing sector and its ability to attract direct foreign investment. In the last 25 years, multinational companies have invested more than $400 billion in China; in 2003, foreign direct investment topped $53 billion.

"In contrast, India's growth has been much more heavily biased toward the service industry," said Williamson. "India has never set itself as an export platform of manufacturing goods."

The intention of the big Indian presence this year in Davos is to change that perception. "We want to tell a story of confidence and resurgence of the manufacturing sector," said N. Srinivasan, director general of the Confederation of India Industry.

Arnand Mahindra, managing director of automobile and farm equipment company Mahindra & Mahindra said it is a cliché that "China will do the hardware and India will do the software."

India will do both, he said, because technology alone will not provide the jobs the country needs.

"India needs more jobs in sectors such as manufacturing, construction, and agribusiness, where it isn't necessary to be a knowledge worker," said Rajat Gupta, managing director at McKinsey.

Some two-thirds of all Indians work in agriculture, where growth is slow and prospects are limited.

China needs to find new sources of growth

China's enormous demand for commodities is well known. It consumes 25% of the world's steel and 50% of the world's cement. It is also home to some of the largest companies on earth, four of which recently cracked the most recent Fortune Global 500 list.

The downside of China's extraordinary growth, however, is that too much investment has led to overcapacity in some industries. At a conference in Davos, Min Zhu, executive assistant president of the Bank of China, said he was relieved that foreign direct investment fell to 40% from 46% a year ago because concerns of overheating in the economy are still prevalent.

The country's overcapacity in steel and aluminum as well as the growing disparity between the east and the rest of the country are key concerns for the government, he added.

But above all, China needs to find new sources of growth, said Nicholas Lardy of the Institute for International Economics.

"They need to replace exports and investment with domestic demand for growth to continue at such levels," he said.

Stephen Roach, chief economist at Morgan Stanley agrees that China needs to redirect its growth model toward private consumption.

One of the ways the government is trying to encourage Chinese citizens to loosen their purse strings is through a reform of the welfare system, said Zhou Xiaochuan, governor of the People's Bank of China.

"China has undertaken several reforms related to the safety net, healthcare reform, pension reform, education reform in the hope to reduce precautionary savings," Zhou said.

Dominic Barton, head of the Asia practice of consultancy McKinsey explained that Chinese people save so much, about 40% of available income, because they don't trust the government to take care of them when they're old or get ill.

"The economic leg is much longer than the social leg in China. That's why the big new motto of the government is 'harmonious society'," he said.

How China copes with a weak banking system, the social problems engendered by the restructuring of its state-owned enterprises, an undeveloped pension and welfare systems, environmental degradation and the reliability of energy and food supplies will determine how well it fares on the global economic scene in the next ten years, said Barton.

India has democracy on its side

India, in contrast, is growing at a more reasonable rate of around 7% and its economy has more than doubled in real terms since reform began in 1991.

Although the country's infrastructure, and its power network in particular, don't compare to that of China, it boasts the enormous advantage of being a democracy.

"As people become richer, they also start wanting things like democracy. The fact that India already is a democracy is a huge advantage on China, which could be strongly disrupted down the line," said Williamson.

But democracy can sometimes play against India.

"It means that reforms take longer," said Srinivasan of the Indian industry group. "So people have the erroneous perception that nothing is happening."

The reforms are crucial if India is to start sharing its newfound wealth with the vast majority of its population, because while the rise of the biotech and IT sectors are a great story, they alone are not enough to create the kind of employment opportunities that will bring broader economic and social progress.

Top of the agenda, India must rein it its budget deficit and find the resolve to deregulate industries such as retailing, banking and defense.

Perhaps the last advantage of India over China is the youth of its population, 70% of which is under 36.

In the short-term, however, there can be no doubt that China is winning the investment game. Foreign direct investment in India has increased since the start of the reforms, but inflows are still anemic, especially compared with the amount China attracts. In the past fiscal year, India took in about $5.5 billion in foreign direct investment, about 8% of China's $64 billion.

Aude Lagorce is a reporter for MarketWatch in London.
_______________________________________________________ 


Powered By PanWebMailer Version 2.0 © 2004-2005

Friday, January 27, 2006

ATTACK ON COOPER, the untold story

jan 27th

'sally's human rights are nobody's concern.

i think she's an OBC, not a harijan, and a hindu. so nobody cares about her rape by a missionary without a valid visa and his thugs.

the 'rape' of nuns (there was no rape, but a hysterical woman made it up) gets repeated again and again and becomes the truth. the rape of an actual OBC or harijan girl is quietly buried. if necessary, she will be killed too (this is what happened to one shari nair in kerala. she was impregnated and then killed).


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: benjamin
Date: 27 Jan 2006 06:13:40 -0000
Subject: ATTACK ON COOPER, the untold story
To:


Dear Francois,

I've just chanced upon the following piece I wrote in 2002 regarding teh so-called attatck on "bishop" Cooper. The contents of the article exposes the entire hollowness of the charges levelled against the "Hindu fanatcis".

ATTACK ON COOPER: THE UNTOLD STORY
From : benjamin panavelil ninan

Is the religious freedom and safety of a White American missionary who, on a
tourist visa, has violated the laws of our land more important than that of
a dalit home nurse, Saly, who has been brutally, continuously and repeatedly, raped, sexually harassed and abused for four months by four Christian beasts in human clothes? Is her life not worth a tear? Is it because we still consider the Whiteman superior to us? Isn't because of our eternal feeling of inferiority, which itself is a legacy of British colonization?

SALY, who lost her parents, is a poor, young Dalit girl. Rev. P.K.Sam and
his wife in January 2001 under the pretext of looking after Kunjoonjamma of
Aluva brought her to the Covenant Hospital and old age home at Mallasseri in Pathanamthitta District of Kerala, as home nurse, from the Adoor Red Cross.

The hospital and old age home belong to the family of 'Pastor' Benson who
was attacked along with the American 'Bishop" Joseph Cooper, allegedly by RSS activists, in Trivandrum recently. Benson, first of all, is not a pastor or a preacher. He is just an ordinary civil contractor working only for the Trivandrum Bible College.

What Sally faced was hell on earth at the hands of four despicable men while
she was at the Covenant Hospital and old age home. Benson, his brothers Dr.
Samson and Stephen and their 70-year-old-father P.K.Sam, one after the
other, repeatedly raped and abused her, regularly, day after day, and night
after night. It was literally an orgy without exaggeration. When the
helpless girl started resisting she was promised a job in USA and was
quietly shifted to Trivandrum Bible College run by C.V.John (uncle of
Benson's wife).

But the dalit girl's nightmarish days continued unendingly. She was not
permitted to contact her family members at Pathanamthitta during these
harrowing days. Somehow, she managed to smuggle out an SOS to her brother.
Her cousin jointly with the activists of Democratic Women's Association
lodged a complaint with Pathanamthitta Police Station. The police swung into
action, raided the Trivandrum Bible College, rescued SALLY from the clutches
of the four wretched Christians and handed her over to her guardians.

The Pathanamthitta Police registered a case against Rev. P.K.Sam and all his
sons. The entire family went underground, fearing imminent arrests. They subsequently obtained anticipatory bail.

However Benson remained underground from October 2002, until he surfaced
suddenly to translate 'Bishop' Cooper's sermons at the Gospel Convention at
Kilimanoor in Trivandrum. It is said that some of the onlookers, who have
been following the notorious sex scandal of the foursome, recognized Benson
in his new avatar. They became furious at his presence and followed him
and others after the meeting. The attack was a spontaneous reaction and was
targeted against Benson and his family only. And 'Bishop' Cooper was
unfortunately caught in the melee.

P.S.

This piece is written on the basis of reports published in Malayalm dailies
and magazines. The press clippings are in my possession.


P.N.BENJAMIN
Coordinator
Bangalore Initiative for Religious






 

Italy judge considers Jesus case

jan 27

we had talked about this case before, but it sounds like it's about to be decided.

let me see, they will:
a) on a technicality, invalide the suit
b) find out that jesus existed
c) find out that jesus did not exist

the chances:
a) 90%
b) 10%
c) 0%

they'd be embarrassed to go with b) but they'd be in deep doo-doo if they went with c)

but good for you, luigi!

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Raj

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4653200.stm


Italy judge considers Jesus case
An Italian court has begun the task of deciding whether a priest should be called to face questioning over whether or not Jesus Christ actually existed.

A court in the town of Viterbo, north of Rome, is considering a case brought by Luigi Cascioli, a devoted atheist.

Mr Cascioli sued Father Righi in 2002 after the priest attacked him in print for casting doubt over the legitimacy of the Christian gospels.

The atheist contends that Christianity relies on purely anecdotal evidence.

Lawyers for the priest and Mr Cascioli appeared before the judge in a brief hearing on Friday to argue whether the case should be thrown out and if Father Righi should stand trial, the AP news agency reported.

A decision is expected on Monday.

"The point is not to establish whether Jesus existed or not, but if there is a question of possible fraud," Mr Cascioli's lawyer, Mauro Fonzo, told reporters.

Mr Cascioli, 76, was once a trainee priest, but drifted away from the Church and has spent much of his life as a committed atheist and anti-religion campaigner.

Documentary dispute

"This complaint does not wish to contest the freedom of Christians to profess their faith," he writes on his website.

Nevertheless, Mr Cascioli says he hopes to use the case "to denounce the abuse that the Catholic Church commits by profiting from its prestige to present historical facts as if they are real when they are only inventions".

He has written extensively on the subject, and his book, The Fable of Christ, provoked Father Righi into a public critique in a church newsletter in 2002.

The priest has countered that millions around the world have long believed in the evidence of the Gospels as well as thousands of other religious and secular writings.

"If Cascioli does not see the sun in the sky at midday, he cannot sue me because I see it and he does not," he has said.

Thursday, January 26, 2006

from the mailbox: Invasion of Body Snatchers

jan 26th

so much for the 'gentle mohammedanism' supposedly practised in malaysia and indonesia. all marxists and fellow travelers always throw this factoid out at people with a sneer. with indian republic day guest, the king of saudi arabia, funding madrassas, they are turning all mohammedans anywhere into clones of their own salafi selves -- extreme religious fundamentalists.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Su

This, written by a Malaysian who prefers to remain anonymous, makes compelling reading.

The Invasion of the Body Snatchers

 by Anonymous

There is a lot of tension between non-Muslims and Muslims in Malaysia over
the growing Islamicization of the country.  There is also an increasing
racial divide.  Things do not look good over here, and it may well turn into
a tragedy, if things aren't put back in order soon.

There are far too many complex issues that have contributed to this ever
widening split.  I won't go through all of them, but I will highlight what
is perhaps the most dangerous issue, the fact that it increasingly appears
that Syariah (Shariah) law is replacing Civil law to become the supreme law
of the land.

Now, the fact that Syariah Law looks like it's becoming the supreme law of
the land, is a complex issue involving Article 121(1A) of the Constitution,
the Moorthy case, and the Nyonya Tahir case.  Please bear with me as I
elaborate on these.

It all began with the recent death of Lance Corporal Moorthy.  Moorthy, an
army commando,  was one of the ten people involved in an expedition to Mount
Everest in 1997.  Now only two of the ten made it to the top.  Moorthy was
not amongst them.  Moorthy did not receive the same kind of glory that two
achieved, although he is still regarded a hero anyway.  The following year
Moorthy was paralyzed waist down as a result of a training accident.
Moorthy fell off his wheelchair on November 11, 2005 and went into a coma.
He did not recover and died on December 20, 2005.

Moorthy's distraught wife, Kaliammal, was given a huge shock when one Malay
army officer told her that Moorthy had converted to Islam a year back.
Kaliammal, a Hindu, couldn't believe what she was hearing.  Insofar as she
was concerned, Moorthy was a practising Hindu right up till the very end.
Needless to say, she could not cremate Moorthy as per Hindu rites.  It ended
up in a religious tussle.  The Syariah (Sharia) Court ruled that Moorthy was
a Muslim, even though no evidence was presented to prove that he was a
Muslim (on the other hand, there is ample evidence to show that he is a
Hindu).  The case went up to the High Court (civil court).  The judge (a
Malay Muslim) washed his hands off this case, stating that they had no
jurisdiction over this case, and that only the Syariah Court had.

Kaliammal was forced to accept the verdict.  Moorthy's body was taken by a
group of strangers and was buried in a Muslim ceremony following the Syariah
Court verdict.  Kaliammal and the rest of his family did not attend.
Kaliammal and the remainder of the family held a Hindu memorial service
instead.   The memorial service was held in a manner similar to that held
for victims swept away by the tsunami.

Now, the high courts decision came as a shock to non-Muslim Malaysians.  We
had always thought that the Syariah Court were subordinate to the High
Court, but this was not the case.   The verdict also sent a signal to
non-Muslims that we are not protected by the courts in cases involving
Islam.  It opens the door to all kinds of abuse....any dead non-Muslim can
be converted to Islam, a non-Muslim child left orphaned can easily be
converted to Islam,etc. (note that the Malaysian government made a big noise
about having non-Muslims present in Aceh after the tsunami.  They feared
that non-Muslim groups would try to convert Muslim children).

Needless to say, this case sparked a Constitutional crisis. Malaysia is
supposed to be a secular nation, not an Islamic nation, as per our
Constitution.

It did in fact turn out that the High Court had jurisdiction over the
Syariah Court, and not as the judge ruled.  The concerned judge cited
Article 121(1A) of the Constitution.

Now, Article 121(1A) of the Constitution was drafted by our former
Attorney-General, Abu Talib Othman, and was enacted as law in 1988. When
questioned, he basically told people that the law was written to prevent
Muslims from leaving the Syariah (Sharia) Courts and going to the High Court
for a decision.  It was never the intention that it should affect
non-Muslims.  In his own words, "If the plaintiff is a non-Muslim, I cannot
imagine the civil court saying it does not have jurisdiction. The problem is
caused by the courts, not the legislature. Courts have abdicated their
powers for not exercising their jusrisdiction on constitutional issues".
(For more details, see "The 'devil' in Federal Constitution Artilcle 121
(1A)" http://www.jeffooi.com/archives/2006/01/the_devil_in_fe.php )

It is quite clear that there was a miscarriage of justice when the High
Court judge washed his hands of responsibility over this case to the Syariah
Courts.

Now, it was openly discussed that;

a.      The judge was partial in this case, putting his own Islamic beliefs
above justice.  In this case, he was not living           up to the oath of office
to remain impartial.

b.      The judge had no guts to stand up to pressure from people of his own
faith

c.      The judge may have been ruling in such a manner to attain a
promotion, and did not have justice in mind.

On hearing all this, the Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism,
Hinduism, Christianity and Sikhism (MCCBHCS)  http://mccbchs.bobjots.org/
organized  nightly candle light vigils in front of the High Court.  These
peaceful candle light vigils also included Muslims, who do see the
unfairness of the courts ruling.  One of the key objectives of the MCCBHCS
was a review of Article 121 (1A).  Note that those holding the candle light
vigils were photographed by the police.

The government in the meantime, tried to squash the case.  The Deputy Prime
Minister (who is also our Defence Minister) came out with a statement that
Moorthy was promoted to Sergeant posthumously and that his widow would be
entitled to benefits.  They also offered Moorthy's widow a job.  All this
was basically to silence non-Muslim critics that under existing law, his
widow and family would not be entitled to anything.  It's also to buy off
Moorthy's wife, lest this escalate into a bigger issue.  But the fact of the
matter is that it has escalated into a bigger issue.  It is now a national
issue.  Whatever the case, you can read an open letter written by Moorthys
widow, Kaliammal, to the Ministry of Defence here http://alvinyv.org/?p=95


I understand that some human rights organization in India wrote to the
Malaysian High Commission in New Dehli on the matter.  I also know that the
Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) of India also lodged a formal complaint with the
Malaysian High Commission in India over the Moorthy case
http://www.hindunet.com/onps/showarticle.php?pb=34&ag=5&a=21280 . I am not
sure where all that went though.

Now the police told the MCCBHCS to stop the candle light vigil, saying that
they could be trouble with unspecified extremists.  One cannot say for sure
who these people were.

Then the fanatical opposition Islamic party, PAS joined the fray (see "It's
hit the fan : PAS joins in Article 121 (1A) fight"
http://alvinyv.org/?p=104). They started uniting Malays from other
political parties such as Keadilan, and even the ruling UMNO party.

While all this was happening, 9 non-Muslim Cabinet Ministers quietly
submitted a memorandum to the Prime Minister, Abdullah Badawi. Now, no one
knows how this leaked to the press. It appears to me that the leak was
deliberate. Whatever the case, it sparked an adverse reaction last Friday.
All of the sudden Muslims took to the streets in protest, shouting and
holding placards.  Other government officials started making noise about
these 9 Cabinet Ministers.  The Malay language newspapers and other
government dominated TV media started taking pot shots at these 9 Cabinet
Ministers.

The 9 non-Muslim Cabinet Ministers were forced to withdraw their memorandum.
If they did not, it would have provoked a very bloody racial/religious
clash.  Bear in mind, the non-Malays/non-Muslims would have been massacred,
given that the Army and police is 90% dominated by Malays/Muslims.

The last I heard is that Kaliammal has lodged an appeal based on the
miscarriage of justice.

Now, another case started to brew, when an 89 year old woman named Nyonya
Tahir died on January 21, 2006.   Nyona Tahir is a Malay (although there are
reports that indicate that she is mixed blooded, in that she is mostly
Chinese, but has a sprinkling of Malay blood).  Whatever the case, she was
brought up a Chinese, married a Chinese, and even has children, all with
Chinese names.   She spent most of her life as a Buddhist.  Whatever the
case, this also ended up in a religious tussle.
http://www.malaysia-today.net/Blog-e/2006/01/another-tussle-over-religious-s
tatus.htm


The Syariah (Shariah) Court ruled that 89-year old Nyonya Tahir, a Malay,
was not a Muslim.  They allowed her family to claim her body and perform
Buddhist funeral rites.

http://www.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2006/1/24/nation/13197630&sec
=nation
http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/nst/Sunday/National/20060122081950/Article/index_html


The courts ruling is good news for Nyonya Tahir's family and non-Muslims in
general.  As a matter of fact, the case does set a precedent in that it goes
against the Constitution which says that all Malays are Muslims by law (how
that got into the Constitution is beyond me).  It may open the floodgates
for apostasy cases, such as the Lina Joy case, or the Ayah Pin case, and
others.

Now, while non-Muslims rejoice at this verdict
http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/46232, there are some disturbing aspects
to it;

a.      In passing his judgement, the Syariah Court judge, Mohd Shukor, quoted
Muslim scholar Syaikh Abu Syujak,"The scholar had said in his book
Kifayatul-Akhyar that a person who had left the Muslim faith should be asked
to repent three times and if he did not, he should be killed, his body
cannot be bathed according to Muslim rites, prayers cannot be performed for
him and he cannot be buried in a Muslim cemetery."

        The implication of this ruling is dangerous, as if Nyonya Tahir was alive,
she could have been killed.  So what message are they really sending?


b.      Can the Syariah Court claim that they deal with non-Muslims fairly?  This
is obviously the message they are trying to convey.  As a matter of fact,
Prime Minister Badawi came out saying that there is justice for non-Muslims.
Is Badawi laying the foundation for the Syariah Courts to be the supreme
law of the land?

        In many ways the Nyona Tahir verdict does just that.  It's a Catch-22
situation. By accepting the verdict, non-Muslims are in fact acknowledging
that the Syariah Court is the supreme law of the land.  It is unfortunately
too late to question why the Syariah Court tried the Nyonya Tahir case, and
not the Civil Court.

        In some ways the Nyonya Tahir case was tried in the Syariah Court, only
because judge in the Moorthy case abdicated the responsibility of the Civil
Court to the Syariah Court.

        So, is Badawi laying the foundation for the Syariah Courts to be the
supreme law of the land?  It was he who directed the non-Muslim Cabinet
Ministers to withdraw their memo.  In a sense, he is showing that he is the
PM for Malays only, and not of all Malaysians
http://www.malaysia-today.net/columns/pillai/index.htm. It was also he who
stated that Article 121(1A) of the Constitution would not be amended.  So,
is Badawi aiding and abetting the transition to the full scale implementation of Islamic law in this country?  Think about it.  In a game of chess, pawns may need to be sacrificied in order to win the game.  The pawn in this case was Nyonya Tahir.

Only minutes ago, did a third case arise, involving a young Chinese woman
who converted to Islam in order to marry a Muslim man, but now wants out of
the religion after their marriage ended in divorce. She does not a tussle
over her dead body.

So now, do you see why I say that Malaysia is heading down a very dangerous
path towards the Islamicization of the country?  It's simply not good news.

economic top dog in the last 2000 years

jan 26th

based on angus maddison's work. and i think maddison is still underplaying india's role as he is extremely laudatory of china in his paper. he doesn't think that much of india, yet his own data show that he should.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_past_GDP_%28PPP%29


Fwd daisies: Bhagavad Gita from Sri Sri

jan 26th

never heard of the ashtavakra gita. can someone enlighten?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Savitha

For what it's worth, I am forwarding to you. Written by a devotee
doing volunteer work at the Bangalore ashram, for silver jubilee.
 
Though I have not heard Sri Sri's discourses on Bhagavad Gita, I have
heard all his Ashtavakra Gita discourses (33 of them, times two).
 
The Ashtavakra Gita is far superior to the Bhagavad Gita. Not many
people know of it, and fewer still care for it. If one reads it, it will only
be like real sawdust. But the discourses from Sri Sri, and hearing it
in satsang settings, brings this amazing treasure to life. And
having heard it, nothing can ever be the same again.
 
Sri Sri calls the Ashtavakra Gita the most unique conversation that
has taken place on this planet. H e asserts that it is the supreme
knowledge that must spread across the length and breadth of the
planet. Having gone through it all, I can only agree 10000%.
 
Well anyway, here's a little bit on Bhagavad Gita from Sri Sri.
 
Savitha.
 
--- In aol_5h@yahoogroups.com, Reshma Kurup < gkreshma@y...> wrote:
 
Dear Friends,
 
In the last 2 months the ashram has been vibrating with seva, satsang, sadhana and knowledge. One can see that the Silver Jubilee Event has already begun....I wish to share some of the knowledge that is being outpoured in the presence of the DIVINE himself....
 
Will do my best to do justice to what was said....
 
Bhagavad Geeta
It was a Sunday evening and Guruji was addressing the crowd in the Amphitheatre. It was the day when Krishna Started the Bhagavad Geeta discourse thousands of years ago.
 
Guruji asked the crowd how many had read the Geeta. Very few hands went up and Guruji immediately said that everyone should read it at least once in their life. And for the next one week we had Geeta chantings with Guruji every evening at Satsangs. It was really like hearing it live from the mouth of Krishna.
 
Some of the brief knowledge points that came out for all of you to ponder:
What happens in fasting?
The objects of senses retire. There is not enough energy. You want to rest. When you fast you are in retire with the sense organs. Still the hankering will be there inside. It will only go when the highest or the supreme glimpse of HIM is gained.
Like a tortoise, when you go to hit a tortoise, it crumbles itself. A Wise person takes his senses away from all the senses.
NO craving, NO fear, NO anger, such a mind which is so established, that stable mind is called A SAINT.
One who rains in ME, in MY MYSTERY is called Stithapragya.
One who is not in touch with his SELF, No feelings is evoked in me. Neither he has brilliance nor does he have feelings.
When there are no feelings, how can there be PEACE.
When there is no peace, where can there be HAPPINESS.
Feelings without intellect will go haywire.
Intellect alone cannot bring peace and happiness.
When you are joined with the consciousness, these things come effortlessly and automatically.
In the pursuit of happiness, your mind goes wherever your senses go. There is no alertness. Like the wind blowing on the surface of the ocean, your consciousness is blown away.
When everyone is awake, then a YOGI is asleep. When people are relaxed, then a YOGI pays attention.
Let go of all the desires. Without concern, when you walk, without any EGO(me ,mine), one attains PEACE.
This is the BRAHMAN STATE OF CONSCIOUSNESS.
Being in this state, YOU ARE AT PEACE, HERE AND AFTER YOU DEPART FROM THIS WORLD.
Tere Chehre pe aisi muskurahat ho, jo koi chin nahi sakta( Let your face have such a smile which nobody can take away).
Dil Saph rahe to sab kam ho jata hai
IF YOUR HEART IS PURE, EVERY WORK GETS DONE.
 
*******************************************************************************


Bring words and photos together (easily) with
PhotoMail - it's free and works with your Yahoo! Mail.

traveling, removed comment moderation

jan 26th

i am traveling so i have removed moderation for the moment. i continue to be unhappy about some of the posts, please exercise due discretion. comment spam is also increasing

happy republic day.

gurumurthy: A mission that enriches the soul of the needy

jan 26th

and without attempting to steal their souls (unlike the m teresa brand of bullshit). of course this doesnt get any publicity.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sree 
Sree

 
A mission that enriches the soul of the needy
Tuesday January 17 2006 21:21 IST

S Gurumurthy

Manikanta, abandoned on the streets, was begging from morning to night in Lalbaugh. Later, he was taken to Chennai to work in a country liquor shop. The shopkeeper read a newspaper article about `Nele' and brought the child to its doors. Today, Nele is Manikanta's home. He is in school, in 4th standard.

Nele is the home for children abandoned to the care of streets to beg, pick rags and do other menial work. It takes them into its bosom, nurses them to good health and mind and initiates them into man-making education. Many such street children picked up by Nele are today role models. They bag prizes in competitions.

Saraswati, just eight, had acute hearing impairment. Her ability to learn was so low that even special schools would not admit her. She joined Aruna Chetna. Today she has blossomed into a creative girl, excelling in dance and art. Groomed as a teaching assistant, she is now in vocational training division in Aruna Chetna itself.

Started in the year 1987, Aruna Chetna takes care of children like Saraswati and others suffering disabilities like cerebral palsy, mental retardation, hearing impairment, partial visual impairment, behavioural and emotional disorders. There are over 160 such impaired children today in Aruna Chetna.

Aruna Chetna has dedicated and experienced teachers who provide comprehensive services to the affected children including physiotherapy, speech therapy, occupational therapy, academic education, self-management, vocational training, sports, music, dance, dramatics, drawing and painting and yoga.

'Prasanna' is a counselling initiative for mental health. Expert counselling is costly in this area and the poor can hardly afford it. So, qualified doctors from NIMHANS are networked as volunteers to counsel the needy. More than 1000 mental cases, 700 family issues, and 500 rehabilitation efforts were successfully handled by Prasanna.

The head of Prasanna, Dr Mrs Pankaja, was awarded `Vidyaratna' in 1998. Various public service outfits like Lions, Rotary, Inner Wheel and others have honoured Prasanna. Nele, Aruna Chetna and Prasanna are just illustrations, different manifestations, of the same mission, the Hindu Seva Pratishtana in Bangalore.

The work of Pratishtana is not limited to these initiatives, but extends to a vast area. Protection of environment is a key concern of Pratishtana. It launched a movement to `Save the Western Ghats' led by Anant Hegde who works with the Pratishtana.

It has instituted a task force to document the bio-resources of various villages in Sagar, Thirthahally and Hosanagara taluks in Karnataka - a far-reaching work.

It has special concern for women and conducts massive programmes mobilising them on the cultural plane. It conducts Deepa Pujas in which thousands participate every year. It organised a Matru Sangama in which 45,000 women from executives and professionals to ordinary slum dwellers resided together.

It also works vigorously to eradicate untouchability and alcoholism. Conceived and executed by Ajit Kumar, a dynamic RSS worker, 25 years ago, the Hindu Seva Pratishtana has over the years grown into a huge, high quality public service mission.

He died young, but thanks to his far-sight, the Pratishtana work has grown exponentially.

As he conceived this mission, Ajit Kumar did not think of building a huge corpus of funds. Instead, he built a team of dedicated volunteers and instituted a system of identifying, training and sustaining more of them.

The idea of public service is generally understood as raising, accumulating and spending funds. Sometimes it is even trivialised as a task, which can be accomplished by just money.

More often than not, skill in fund raising is considered more important to engage in public service. But Ajit Kumar was different. He believed that motivated men, motivated by the urge to serve the motherland through the service of the needy, are more critical than money.

He proved right. Thanks to his vision, today in the Pratishtana there are over 3000 whole-time volunteers - yes 3000! They are called `Sevavratis', that is, those who have taken a vow for service. They are competent in different fields, well-trained and motivated by high levels of compassion linking the service they deliver to the idea of man-making and nation-building.

A 'Sevavrati' takes oath to give full time to the Pratishtana for three years. But, there are `Sevavratis' who are working for over 15 years. In addition there are thousands of equally dedicated workers who work only part time.

This huge stock of trained, sincere and committed workers constitutes the real asset of the Pratishtana, not the moderate financial numbers disclosed in its balance sheet.

But the story of Pratishtana is still not complete. It is a mission whose service enriches the soul of the needy who receive its help, and not trade off its service for change of faith, God, or culture of the recipient.

Those missions that offer relief to the needy in exchange for the recipient being persuaded to disown his or her faith or God or culture are also celebrated as great social service missions.

But, the Pratishtana is different, because its services have no aim or intent other than building a mighty and prosperous India. This is real national service, man-making and nation-building service, which Swami Vivekananda repeatedly commended to the youth of India.

The Hindu Seva Pratishtana that serves the acutely needy is actually transforming into a movement in Karnataka. This illustrious mission is entering its Silver Jubilee Year on February 25, 2006.

What a sorry state of affairs!

jan 26th

how to destroy competitive advantage. the indian politician and in particular the congressi variety should be the subject of numerous case studies on how they inevitably choose the most non-optimal alternative out of those available.

is anybody listening at the iims? write cases, will you?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Brahma

 

Nuke scientists battle PMO on US deal
- By Seema Mustafa

New Delhi, Jan. 24: The Prime Minister's Office and the department of atomic energy differ on several aspects of the US-India civilian nuclear deal, with top nuclear scientists determined not to allow the United States full say in the separation of the country's military and civilian nuclear facilities.

The Americans' insistence on a full, and not as initially stated, phased separation plan was the initial bone of contention, with the nuclear establishment particularly worried about the pressure to place the fast breeder reactors on the civilian programme that will be subject to intrusive IAEA inspections under the additional protocol. The initial assurance that India will be recognised as a nuclear weapons state on par with US is also not being met, leading to deep apprehension among the scientists that the country's nuclear programme is being brought "through the backdoor" under a stringent inspections regime.

The media is being used now by both the Americans and the Prime Minister's Office, through select briefings, to push the deal forward although, as well-placed sources pointed out, "it has run into trouble" and will require Dr Manmohan Singh's direct intervention by accepting key US conditions to push it out of the woods. The PMO officials have reportedly made it apparent that they would like the separation plans to be finalised, and the agreement to be placed on course for the approval of the US Congress before the visit of US President George W. Bush to India.

The civilian nuclear agreement was based on three major assurances that have since been overruled by Washington. One, as the sources pointed out, was the voluntary identification and separation of military and civilian facilities. Two, that this would be done in phases. Three, India would be recognised as a responsible state with advanced nuclear technology status at par with the US. The voluntary nature of the agreement has been lost, with the Bush administration clear that the separation plans had to be vetted and approved by it. The sources pointed out that the second assurance too has been negated with the US demand that the separation plans should be complete and immediate. The US condition now that the safeguards should be "in perpetuity", the sources added, makes a mockery of the third assurance as it denies recognition of India as a responsible nuclear power.

The whispers of unhappiness with the civilian nuclear agreement from the department of atomic energy surfaced during this visit of US pointperson Nicholas Burns, who led a large team of officials for consultations with foreign secretary Shyam Saran. A third round of talks is scheduled for February, although Mr Burns did not sound very optimistic of a breakthrough and admitted that certain difficulties had cropped up. Dr Manmohan Singh is reportedly very keen to get this agreement through as it is being equated with his earlier stint in government when he had ushered in — as his media adviser Sanjaya Baru often tells journalists — a new era of economic reforms.

There is genuine fear in the pro-nuclear lobby that India's strategic interests will be compromised if the US proposals are accepted in entirety, with sources pointing out that the very idea of separating the civilian programme from the military was fraught with consequences that would undermine the nation's nuclear sovereignty. The face-off on the fast breeder programme that is seen as unique by the nation's nuclear establishment and other aspects of the agreement will need a prime ministerial directive to resolve, with sources pointing out that any such move might not have the support of the nuclear establishment.

Mr Burns has made it clear that it will be difficult to get the agreement through the US Congress until and unless the separation plans met with the full approval of the Bush administration. Indian officials have also been told that the US has its own ideas about Indian nuclear facilities, and these expectations will have to be met in a transparent, credible and defensible manner.

 

iims: Why flee to Singapore?

jan 26th

the obvious counterquestion: why not 'colonize' singapore?

the iims are, as far as i understand, massively increasing their intake anyway.

so what's wrong with building the brand by starting up in singapore as well? i think it's a great idea.

people may not be aware of the fact that there are already a number of exchange programs, where students from the iims spend a semester abroard and vice versa.

since there is interest in india, this is a good time to build up india's education brand abroad. the us probably makes $100 billion a year on overseas remittances for education. yet that has absolutely not prevented the top us schools from opening campuses abroad, in fact these act as 'feeders'.

i think the writer of this article is exhibiting the usual 'koopa-mandhooka' mindset that troubles so many in india.

also, i suspect these are the same people who objected to the (admittedly hare-brained) idea of mm joshi's to reduce fees!

translation: the iims are "finishing schools for the middle-classes" subsidised by the poor! and the middle classes want it to stay that way!

the quote is from old prof anthony reddy of iit madras in the iit context. this is still more true of the iims


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Girish K

http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/jan242006/editpage1417312006123.asp

Business schools of excellence
Why flee to Singapore?
By Vatsala Vedantam
The IIMs should provide education in socially relevant areas to poor and capable students who need it badly
 

The Government allots large tracts of land to establish them. It funds their infrastructure, maintenance and development. They take shape, grow and prosper. Their alumni find lucrative careers, mostly abroad. That, in short, is the story of India's prestigious professional schools. The IITs and IIMs — institutions built with the taxpayers' money — are the country's pride. In a manner of speaking, the country's shame as well. Students who graduated from these campuses and fled the country enrich other countries and universities. Some of them head Fortune 500 companies. While others help their foreign bosses to make a fortune. All this out of the education they received in their alma maters in India. The public helplessly watches this sad brain drain.

Now, what if the instutions themselves threaten to flee the country which nurtured them? The latest move by the IIMs to expand overseas defies all canons of ethics in education. When they were first conceived in a newly independent India, it was to professionalise management through teaching, research and training "in order to improve the working of the most important sectors of this country's economy such as agriculture, health, population control and public administration." Also to develop future teachers, researchers and other professionals in managerial skills that would improve different spheres of activity in India. Unfortunately, these objectives have made way to promote savvy business ends.

The first of these institutions (IIM-A) was established in collaboration with the state government in Ahmedabad in 1961. This was followed by others in Calcutta, Bangalore, and Lucknow whose maintenance and development expenditure was borne by the Government of India under a block grant scheme. This was modified in 2004 (when their fee structure was rationalised) to provide them greater functional autonomy and help them generate their own resources. However, the Centre made it clear that management studies ad research should be enlarged "within the overall parameters of the government policies and programmes." The IIMs have depended largely on the government since their inception for salaries and allowances, upkeep of buildings and libraries, student scholarships, travel and other contingencies.

They have also received grants under the Plan budget for creating permanent infrastructural facilities like lecture halls, student hostels and teachers' quarters. They have expanded their libraries and conference centres through some more grants. This steady increase in government funding has run into crores of rupees over the years. Not only are they the premier business schools in India today: they easily compare with the best anywhere in the world.

Country needs managers

If they now have surplus funds with them as a result of such state largesse, it would only be proper to enlarge their programmes first within the country where the demand for sound management education is high in all areas of production. Autonomy does not mean abandoning base and transferring resources elsewhere.

The role of the IIMs was not to churn out an elite band of white collared professionals. The country needs trained managers at different levels in several undermanaged sectors such as primary health care, agriculture and rural/urban development where career opportunities have to be opened up. The IIMs should start exploring such areas of employment, devise appropriate courses, and train students accordingly. So far, they have been identified as elite schools producing ace professionals.

Why not provide the same elite education to generate professionals who have a social relevance to this country's needs? There are several areas of such high priority. If the IIMs take up educational programmes relevant to these sectors, they will not only be utilising their resources meaningfully, but their faculty members would also get sufficient exposure and experience in new areas of teaching and research.

The IIM-B has taken up public systems as part of its post-graduate programme. It has already been advised to organise a separate stream in public management by choosing sectors like energy, transportation, panchayati raj or urban planning – all relevant to Karnataka. Similarly, each IIM could identify undermanaged sectors in their reach and launch management courses relevant to that particular environment. Public administration and rural development are always high priority areas that need to be addressed in this country. Where is the need to run to Singapore or anywhere else when so much needs to be done here and now? The IIMs could establish stronger links with industries to augment their corpus funds. Charging fees from prospective employers at the time of campus interviews and recruitment of students would also generate more resources. Admitting foreigners through a specialised test like the GMAT would certainly attract both good students and tuition fees. Better such strategies rather than transporting themselves abroad – either physically or virtually. Relocating to other countries would only divert their resources and dilute their programmes within the country.

Besides, where is the need for the IIMs to sell themselves as a brand name? Their credibility is already established. Instead, why not follow the U R Rao recommendation of providing a good management education in socially relevant areas to more poor and capable students here who need it badly?

-
-
-


Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new and used cars.

sandhya jain on UCC

jan 26th

yes, sensible and desirable. also impossible given the UPA's very instincts.

as demonstrated by today's republic day guest: the king of saudi arabia. the saudis will one day be remembered for wasting one of the greatest windfalls ever, by not investing their oil wealth on their people (esp on their women), but on building extremist madrassas all over. the goal is world conquest. like the missionaries they are not interested in those who have already been 'saved', only on 'saving' new people and especially 'saving' new land.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sa

Organiser-22January2006

UCC possible & desirable

 

Sandhya Jain

 

In the current atmosphere of unsolicited appeasement of the Muslim community by the ruling UPA, it seems futile to advocate a uniform civil code. Yet the time is propitious as a small village in Greater NOIDA has stood up for a motherless child. Its decision contrasts with the attitude of the ulema who in September 2004 made a sick young woman leave the husband she loved, and meets contemporary society's notions of justice and fair play.

 

To recapitulate, in 1999, young Gudiya was married to Army jawan Arif, and ten days later he left for the Kargil war; she never saw him again. When the army declared him presumed dead, Gudiya was married five years later to her cousin, Taufeeq. She was eight months pregnant with his child when Arif suddenly returned from a Pakistani jail. Amidst reports of financial demands by Gudiya's father, Arif refused to divorce her (their marriage was legally valid) and demanded she return to him. He also expressed reluctance to take responsibility for her child, an attitude that caused widespread social revulsion.

 

Gudiya expressed herself in favour of remaining with the second family, where she was happy. But the Muslim religious leadership decided to make her a showcase for the supremacy of the Shariat, and in a very one-sided and male-dominated televised panchayat on a well-known channel, the visibly unhappy young woman, who was then running a high fever and suffering high blood pressure, was forced to return to Arif. All secular, reformist and visible faces of the Muslim community left the poor girl to her fate.

 

Fourteen months later, Gudiya died a prolonged and painful death of multiple organ failure on 2 January 2006, as a result of septecaemia and other complications following a stillborn delivery last year. Despite muted media coverage, news of her death shocked many, and there was outrage when Arif went around giving press statements that he would adopt her child from Taufeeq. Many felt Gudiya would not have died if she could have lived with Taufeeq, as there would have been no immediate second pregnancy. There was also a feeling that if Arif invoked the Shariat to take back his unwilling wife, he could not infringe the rights of the biological father.

 

These sentiments seemed to have weighed with Gudiya's Kalaunda village, which has stepped forward to ensure the best interests of her infant son, Mateen. Keeping in mind the fact that both Arif and Taufeeq are young men who may marry again and have families, the panchayat has given Gudiya's father, Imamuddin, custody of the child till he is eighteen years old. Taufeeq, the biological father, has been given guardianship rights, with the proviso that he deposit Rs. 30,000/- and transfer half his property in the name of the child. The decision has been recorded on stamp paper and signed by Arif, Taufeeq, Imamuddin, and panchayat leaders Akhtar and Rajiv Sharma.

 

It is difficult to imagine a more just settlement, and the fact that it has arisen out of the collective wisdom of a village community shows how traditional India works when left unmolested by sensation-seeking activists and self-appointed leaders. It shows how castes and communities in India quietly cooperate to give life meaning and harmony.

 

The issue of Mateen's custody shows that Muslim communities at village level are not so hidebound about adherence to a literalist interpretation of their personal laws, as is often claimed. Nor are they incapable of innovation, if spared the intrusive presence of regressive maulvis, who make their living out of terrorizing the community to fall in line with their diktat on any issue.

 

I believe the Gudiya tragedy has privately spurred the Muslim community to undertake a more flexible approach to its personal laws and their interpretation in a modern world. This is therefore the best time for the government to push ahead on the issue of a uniform civil code, to cater to the legitimate needs of citizens caught in a cusp between their traditional roots and a changing world. A uniform civil code would have helped Gudiya to live with the man she loved.

 

Close on the heels of the Gudiya case, 25-year-old Imrana was allegedly raped by her father-in-law. When the crime became known, the caste panchayat declared her marriage dissolved and asked her to marry the alleged rapist; she was directed to treat the father of her five children as a 'son.' The Deoband Darul Uloom upheld the Ansari caste decision, but later denied issuing a fatwa after the matter became political with the Bharatiya Janata Party and CPI (M) condemning the judgment. This indicates that even Deoband concedes that evolving sensibilities have to be accommodated.

 

The Imrana case led to numerous cases of incestuous rape being reported in many parts of the country, alongside regressive judgments by local maulvis. It created awareness that Muslim women need more agency in their lives. There is a feeling that the then dominant national leader, Jawaharlal Nehru, denied Muslims equal citizenship in free India by cynically refusing to weld a tortured society into a harmonious whole, and perpetuated communal separatism to serve his votebank politics.

 

The Constituent Assembly shelved the uniform civil code through a subterfuge called Article 44 of the Directive Principles. A uniform civil code did not require community-based approval, any more than the other provisions of the constitution. The sole purpose of a Muslim personal law was to achieve a political goal. The nation was told that a separate civil law for Muslims did not discriminate against Hindus.

 

But the issue was that the personal law gave the ulema disproportionate power over the community and oppressed ordinary Muslims. The Muslim sense of being backward and disadvantaged in independent India has its genesis in this abandonment by the secular state, even though Muslims are not aware of this deeper reality. If the community realizes that its best interests are served in a uniform civil code, then a nation-wide exercise could be undertaken to revise and improve the UCC by extending positive aspects from the Islamic tradition to other groups. Former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee pointed out during a parliamentary debate in 1998 that the Islamic practice of taking a woman's consent at the time of marriage greatly appealed to him; others have appreciated the woman's right to seek annulment of an unhappy marriage.

 

END

 


from the mailbox: Hodka Village - endogenous tourism in Kutch, Gujarat

jan 26th

sounds interesting, i guess 'endogenous' is another new term for 'ethnic'? kerala has succesfully pushed 'ethnic' tourism recently.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: s

Received the following from elsewhere, please pass on this info to your
friends. -- S

I am writing to ask for your support in spreading the word about an
Endogenous Tourism Project initiated by the Kutch Mahila Vikas Sangathan
(Kutch Women's Development Organisation) in Kachchh, Gujarat, india. KMVS
has been working in Kachchh since 1989 with women in the villages on
empowering women socially, economically, financially and politically. There
are now four women's organisations with 12000 members in 165 villages.

For this project, we are being supported by the Ministry of Tourism,
Government of India and UNDP. We have put up our website - www.hodka.in

Would it be possible for you to share this information with colleagues,
family and friends, both in India and elsewhere?

Also check out http://www.exploreruralindia.org/ - this has info about all
the 31 villages in this (Endogenous Tourism) project.


More on Hodka:



Hodka village is situated in the Banni grassland, on the edge of the Great
Rann of Kachchh – the large salt desert in Western India. The village is
famous for its craft and craft persons who have received several national
and state level awards. They receive many visitors each year from all parts
of the world who come to learn their craft,
share ideas or simply to appreciate craft.

This has been capitalised upon by UNDP, who have chosen Hodka village as one
of their 31 sites in India for an Endogenous Tourism Project owned, built
and managed by the community. The project has been initiated with a resort,
the Shaam-e-Sarhad (Sunset on the Border). Accommodation here is in
beautiful tents or the traditional bhunga, a
conical mud structure. While the ambience is rustic, the comfort is that of
any modern hotel with attached bathrooms and running water. The kitchen
provides traditional Kachchhi and Gujarati food with special snacks of the
area also being made available.

Shaam-e-Sarhad can accommodate 26 persons comfortably. It is an ideal
location for undisturbed work as there is no television on site and phone
access is limited.

Day trips can be organised to nearby attractions such as Kala Dungar,
Flamingo City, the Rann, etc. with local guides who are fully conversant
with the history and culture of the area and take pride in sharing it with
visitors.


The Project will move on to facilitating home stays with crafts persons
imitating the ancient Gurukul system so that those interested can learn
craft to the level that they desire – over a week or over a year.

While the members of the community are still learning how to run the
Project, professional support is being provided by trained staff through the
Kutch Mahila Vikas Sangathan (KMVS) and its sister organisations. KMVS has
been working in Kachchh since 1989 with women in the villages on empowering
women socially, economically,
financially and politically.

The District Administration has also been very supportive in ensuring that
the Project is provided with all facilities for its successful running.

Bhuj is accessible by road, rail or air. From Bhuj, Hodka is 63 km by road.
Transport can be arranged on request. Jet Airways flies once daily from
Mumbai (to Bhuj). There are daily trains connecting Bhuj to Ahmedabad and
Mumbai and less frequent connections to Delhi.


on the occasion of republic day: navy news

jan 26th

india's navy is the finest in the region, despite years of neglect by the usual anti-national suspects. and there 's nothing like a navy to project power long-range, even today.

-----------------------------

Subject: Indian Navy: Synergising Diplomacy & Operations by Vijay Sakhuja
http://www.observerindia.com/strategic/st060123.htm#1
Indian Navy: Synergising Diplomacy And Operations
Vijay Sakhuja

In a significant development, January 2006 witnessed two important events for the Indian Navy. At the operational level, the Indian Navy commissioned its UAV Squadron, Indian Naval Air Squadron (INAS) 342 comprising 12 Israeli-built Herons and Searcher Mark II, Headquarters, Southern Naval Command at Kochi. According to Admiral Arun Prakash, "After three years of intensive flying trials, we are now among the pioneers in the esoteric art of UAV operations at sea. INAS 342 is going to be an asset, which will enhance our maritime domain awareness manifold."

The UAVs were first inducted into the Indian Navy in early 2003 and formed part of the Intensive Flying and Trials Unit. The Indian Navy is one of the first to operate the UAVs out in the sea in a tropical environment. Israel is now operating UAVs for maritime patrol and the United States is also experimenting with these. Naval planners the world over are convinced that UAVs are ideal for this job. The UAVs can be operated from any shore location and can be controlled from specially equipped ships. They can carry out reconnaissance hundreds of miles out at sea.

On the diplomatic front, the Indian Navy conducted the MILAN 2006. Naval personnel from several South East Asian countries participated in the naval exercises organised at Port Blair, in the Andaman and Nicobar islands. India has been hosting these biennial meetings with participants from Bangladesh, Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Thailand, Singapore and Sri Lanka to foster closer cooperation among navies of countries in the Indian Ocean region. Milan 2006 also witnessed Myanmar shed its 'self- imposed maritime isolation' and dispatch UMS Anawyahta to Port Blair to participate in the event.

In their presentations, the Indian Navy announced that it has the capacity and capability to provide maritime support to the Malacca Straits littorals in keeping the Straits free of piracy and terrorism. Indian Navy's 15 warships (eight landing crafts utility, four amphibious landing ships and three fast attack craft) permanently based at Port Blair can be mobilized to join the littorals. So far Indian Navy has had only bilateral cooperation and is now looking at multilateral cooperation for the safety and security of Malacca Straits.

Interestingly, the above events are closely related. In September 2005, Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand launched the "Eye in the Sky" initiative and commenced coordinated air patrols over the Malacca Straits. Under the initiative, the Malacca Straits littorals make available two maritime aircraft each to patrol the Straits. The aircraft patrol the waterway and do not cross over to the airspace of the other participants.

In 2004, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore had launched coordinated sea patrols in the Malacca Straits. This was in response to the April 2004 US led Regional Maritime Security Initiative (RMSI) that envisaged deployment of Marines and Special Forces troops on high-speed boats in the Malacca Straits to combat terrorism, proliferation, piracy, gun running, narcotics smuggling and human trafficking in the area. Malaysia and Indonesia had reacted to RMSI and had noted that the US should get permission from regional countries for such an initiative as it impinged on their national sovereignty. However, Singapore, a close US ally, had favoured the initiative, which never fructified.

New Delhi has watched with great interest the maritime security developments in the Malacca Straits. It is conscious of the sensitivities of the regional countries that are apprehensive of extra regional navies and would do anything to stop them from staking a claim in regional security. The regional countries now acknowledge the lack of capacity and capability to maintain continuous air surveillance in the Malacca Straits. None of the littorals has a large fleet of maritime patrol aircraft to provide a 24 x 7 surveillance over the Straits. Also there are no UAVs in their inventory.

It is in this context that the newly commissioned INAS 342 fits the bill. For very long duration operations, there is a need to have an appropriate mix of both manned and unmanned maritime patrol platforms. These will have to be integrated into additional sensors on aerial early warning and signals intelligence aircraft. Besides, getting information from multiple sources is the trend, and Malacca Straits littorals should think of themselves as trendsetters in this field.

An increasing number of maritime agencies are using pilot-less surveillance aircraft to patrol territorial waters, offshore oil and gas platforms and pipelines and aid in other maritime security missions such as countering human trafficking, drug smuggling and illegal fishing. UAVs could be very valuable force multipliers to enhancing security in the Malacca Straits as these platforms can provide a real or near-real time tactical picture at sea and with some sensors they can detect irregular maritime activity.

It must be mentioned that the close proximity of Andaman and Nicobar islands to the Straits of Malacca, makes India part of the Malacca Straits Security System and a valid case for the patrolling of the Straits by the Indian Navy. Here is an opportunity for the Indian Navy to offer support to the Malacca Straits littorals by way of its UAVs. These platforms can be integrated to the regional maritime air patrol effort and provide a more useful and comprehensive common picture for Total Maritime Domain Awareness (TMDA). As regards challenges from technical and procedural interoperability and doctrinal and language diversities, the solution lies in joint exercises, training and enhanced navy-to-navy contacts. Clearly, the long-term trend is towards cooperative maritime security.

Vijay Sakhuja is Senior Fellow with ORF, New Delhi.

Monday, January 23, 2006

crusade in india booklet: exposing christist designs

jan 23rd

interesting material about christists' game plans and ploys.

Subject: Crusade in India


Here is the url for this booklet online:

http://www.burningcross.net/crusades/crusade-in-india.html

COMMUNIST BLAME GAME

jan 23rd

i agree with dr. suseelan. the communists are complete hypocrites.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Babu Suseelan <babu



COMMUNIST BLAME GAME

 

             Dr. Babu Suseelan

 

 

Why has anti-Hindutva become the mantle of the communist politicians? Anti-Hindutva is a very old social disease of the Communists. It has been a permanent feature of Islam and Christianity for thousands of years and the Hindu hatred has obviously morphed and metastasized into many forms. Christian and Islamic hatred is rooted in their irrational dislike, fear, envy and mistrust of Hindus who do not subscribe to their closed, rigid, dualistic, all exclusive dogma.

 

Now the Communists have joined their bandwagon to blame and scapegoat Hindus as followers of primitive traditions and irrational spiritual and temple practices. The Hindu hatred of the Leftists, pseudo liberals and phony secularists has different dimensions. As a form of irrational hatred, it has expressed itself in many ways. At first, it was mostly hatred against Hindu Darsanas, and spiritual Sadhanas. Nowadays Hindu hatred's main expression is political and couched in confusing jargons to denigrate Hindu unity movement. It is found in actions and ideologies that call for the destruction of Hindu temples, spiritual movements, yoga, meditation, Ayurveda, Hindu educational institutions and Hindu cultural practices. Communist hatred of Hindu Darsnana includes the rejection of Hindu spiritual tradition and their right to live and flourish individually and collectively. It has taken religious, pseudo-scientific, pseudo-liberal and political forms. Most often Hindu hatred is used by Communists to deflect criticism against Jihadi terrorism, coercive religious conversion and political corruption.

 

Leftists and pseudo liberals may find complex reality of Jihadi terrorism and Christian fundamentalism too tragic to grapple and prefer to deny the clear and present danger we are currently facing. The Communists have deliberately failed to recognize that Islam and Christianity practice religious apartheid-always have-and still practice it.

 

In their latest diatribe and blame game, the Communists have collaborated with Muslim Jihadis and Christian fundamentalists in scapegoat Hindus for not allowing non-Hindus to enter our sacred Guruvayorappan Temple. The latest salvo is the Communist's inchoate anger directed at Hindus who refuse to assimilate to the Communist agenda. Denial of entry for non-Hindus at Guruvayoor temple, we are told (falsely) is caused by general discrimination practiced by Hindus against non-Hindus. What we are never told is that practice of Hinduism is required for entry at the sacred Guruvayoor temple.   Over the last few years, the Communists and phony liberals have portrayed non-entry of non-Hindus at Guruvayoor Temple, as a major threat to pluralism.

 

There are many reasons, why temples cannot become a tourist center. First and foremost that the temple is a spiritual center. The temple is a place where GOD may be approached and where divine knowledge can be discovered. The dedication of the body of the worshipper to the deity is necessary preclude to ceremonial worship. In this rite the worshipper purifies and consecrates each part of his person that he may become fit to appear before a GOD. No man should enter a temple as long as he himself has not become a deity. "To worship a deity, a man must become the self of that deity through dedication, breadth control, and concentration until his body becomes the deity's abode" (Gandharva Tantra).

 

Commercial film producers and play back singers belonging to Christian and Islamic faiths, who produce, market and profit Guruvayoorappan films and songs do not qualify to enter Guruvayoor temple unless they practice Hindu spiritual sadhanas. Atheists, moral agnostics, anti-Hindu communists have no reason to enter Guruvayoor temple and desecrate the spiritual sanctity.

 

It is a classic, brutal Communist blame game masquerading as a progressive campaign to help ant-Hindu forces. It is a deceptive game at both preserving and protecting the privileged statuesque of Islam and Christianity while at the same time making leftists feel "progressive". Communist blame game is part of the Christian, Muslim, Communist plan to oppress Hindus and prepare them for conversion. The point here is that Christians, Muslims and Communists are soul mates and their blaming the victim is very old game that takes an especially obnoxious quality when buttressed by smug liberal platitudes. Sadly, much of our public swallows it whole. And there is no end of it in sight.

 

Communist Hindu hatred precludes them from questioning brutal, discriminatory practices of Islam and Christianity. Leftist liberals prefer to blame Hindus for Jihadi terrorism, coercive religious conversion and subversive activities by anti-national forces.   By aligning with Islamic and Christian forces and ignoring their discriminating practices, Communists benefit greatly themselves from the way things are. Only the Hindu unity movement disturbs communists. What they do not want is any sort of fundamental change, which might result in reduction of privilege for Christians and Muslims.

 

It is one of the characteristics of Communist Hindu bashing that restrict them from exposing the evil practices of Islam and Christianity. Jihadi terrorism today poses the greatest threat to Indian civilization. In our left-wing dominated political climate we are told that terrorism arises from Hindu activism. Jihadi terrorism including bombing, beheading, bus burning, and temple attacks, torture and hijacking are simply a reaction to Hindu assertiveness. The twisted logic of the Communists earns them applause from the Jihadi terrorists and their sponsors.   Communists never support for the inclusion of women as members of the clergy of the Roman Catholic Church. In Islam, women have fewer rights than men with regard to marriage, divorce, civil rights, legal status, dress code and education. Muslims feel that the Koran and Sunnah mandate these restrictions as explicated by Sharia, or Islamic law. Islam is deeply anti-woman. Islam has always considered woman as creatures inferior in every way physically, intellectually, and morally. Communists are aware that Islam is deeply anti-woman. We hear daily about Islamic oppression and misogyny (female illiteracy, honor killing, female genital mutilation, forced marriages, physical abuse). Communists are eager to join with Muslim clergy to justify these atrocities with supposed religious dictates and self-serving interpretations of scripture. Saudi Arabia restricts entry of non-Muslims to Mecca. Catholics never allow a third world Bishop to become a Pope. The obsessive neutrality of Communists on such apartheid practices suggests their irrational reality orientation, and their eagerness to identify with the aggressors.

 

The Catholic Church does not allow married and women priests. They protect orthodoxy and not cave in to modern social mores.   The Communist response on these oppressive practices is silence. Phony liberals and leftists are unable to acknowledge their own shortcomings, and present danger of Jihadi Islam and Catholic apartheid. The present predicament of the leftists indicates their Hindu hatred; blindness and stupidity are crippled by a real inability to think clearly and rationally.

 

It is patriotic to criticize one's country in order to improve it-but it is foolish and dangerous to focus on the majority Hindus who are tolerant, peace loving. Ignoring human rights violation of Islamic and Christian nations and Jihadi terrorism is the betrayal of truth and the denial of the danger. Hindu hatred may function as a way for the Communist to feel powerful-not by really solving their own problems but by finding a sacred scapegoat to blame and ritually sacrifice.


brahma chellaney: Don't play into Iran's hands--ET


jan 23

brahma is of the opinion that iran is not as irrational as the yanks believe them to be; nor are they going to be as easy pickings as the yanks thought the iraqis would be (though even they have turned out to be a hard nut to crack).

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Brahma Chellaney < brahma@bol.net.in>
Date: Jan 23, 2006 2:50 AM
Subject: Don't play into Iran's hands--ET.doc
To: b@vsnl.net

Economic Times, January 23, 2006

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1381514.cms

 

Don't play into Iran's hands

 

Short-sighted penal steps against Iran will prove counterproductive, strengthening the mullah regime there and provoking it to use its oil weapon and walk out of the NPT regime, cautions Brahma Chellaney

 

 

The United States and European Union have taken the lead to frame a robust international response to a series of provocative actions by Iran's hard-line president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The wise way to tackle a renegade Iran, however, is not through punitive action but through sustained international pressure.

 

            Any penalizing steps against a theocratic state that has already faced assorted sanctions for more than a quarter-century would only play into the hands of the Iranian mullahs and their political deputies led by Ahmadinejad. Since coming to office last August, Ahmadinejad has adopted fiery rhetoric reminiscent of Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini who led the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

 

New sanctions could constrict the already-tight world oil supplies and further drive up prices, affecting global economic outlook. A diplomatic or military confrontation with Iran could actually have a greater impact on world oil supplies and prices than what happened with the U.S. invasion of Iraq. That is because, unlike in 2003, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and other oil producers do not the spare capacity to make up any supply deficit.

 

Sanctions will also demoralize and undercut the large, growing constituency of moderate Iranians that are opposed to the clergy's political role. Any major punitive action, moreover, is likely to provoke Tehran to play its energy and nuclear cards in a way the West might regret.

 

All told, the United States, Britain, Germany and France — the four states most actively seeking to discipline Iran — do not have a credible plan of action that could help tame the clerical regime in Tehran. Rather their present approach could prove counterproductive, adding to the list of America's Iran blunders, including the 1952 CIA-scripted overthrow of nationalist Mohammed Mossadeq and the 1980 U.S.-encouraged Iraqi aggression under Saddam Hussein against post-revolution Iran.

 

            If one accepts that Ahmadinejad's actions are premeditated, with the intent to needle and provoke the West, it follows logically that the United States, Europe and democracies like Japan, Israel and India should not walk into his trap. Pushed against the wall by growing Western pressures, Ahmadinejad's regime has calculated that Iran has little to lose if it hit back. 

 

Nothing will please Ahmadinejad and the ayatollahs more than to be handed a freshly chiselled sanctions tool to whip up nationalism at home and tighten their vice-like grip on power at a time of waning revolutionary spirit in the country. The international effort should be to undermine, not strengthen, the mullah hold over Iran.

 

Rather than be incited into imposing sanctions by the Iranian president's wacky actions — from breaking nuclear-facility seals to announcing a conference that would call into question evidence that the Nazis conducted a mass murder of European Jews during World War II — it will be more prudent to find quiet ways to choke Iran's nuclear ambitions and internationally isolate Ahmadinejad. It is possible to achieve both.

 

A sober, able international response, however, has been made harder to shape because reaction to Ahmadinejad's incendiary rhetoric and irresponsible actions in some circles has veered toward the extreme, as exemplified by public calls for exemplary punishment and even a military option against Iran. With such calls has come exaggeration, with Iran portrayed as a pressing proliferation threat.

 

Iran is years away from acquiring the capability to build a nuclear weapon. And it is unlikely to attain such capability as long as the International Atomic Energy Agency is tightly monitoring its nuclear programme, as it has been ever since it discovered undeclared Iranian nuclear activity. The only way Iran will be able to build nuclear military capability would be if it exercised its right to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and kicked out IAEA inspectors — the route North Korea chose. That is exactly what coercive action or sanctions against Iran will invite.

 

Ahmadinejad has sprung a nasty surprise by abruptly ending a two-year Iranian moratorium on nuclear research activity. But by daring the IAEA and Security Council to declare Iran in breach of its legal obligations, there is method to his madness. He is directly challenging the implicit U.S.-led effort to divide non-nuclear states in two categories — those that can or cannot pursue nuclear fuel-cycle capabilities. By forcing America's hand so as to bring out in the open that states armed or shielded with nuclear weapons are changing the rules, he is seeking to bring matters to a head in the crisis-torn NPT regime.

 

The challenges that confront the non-proliferation regime go far beyond the Iran case. Those challenges are symbolized by the nine-year impasse at the UN's disarmament negotiating forum in Geneva; the lack of any reference to disarmament or non-proliferation in the final document of the World Summit at the UN last September; the bleak prospects of bringing the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty into force; and the stunning failure of the 2005 NPT review conference to produce any consensus. 

 

Defusing the NPT crisis demands greater attention to find ways to resolve international differences on three core areas — disarmament, non-proliferation and peaceful applications of nuclear energy. Misplaced, one-dimensional zealotry on non-proliferation that seeks to portray Iran as a central challenge to the NPT not only misses the wood for the trees but also risks doing what Ahmadinejad wants — exacerbate the regime's problems.

 

At issue are Iran's intentions, not capabilities. They can be effectively monitored and checkmated through stepped-up IAEA inspections, including of the resumed Iranian research activity, and greater multilateral cooperation on export controls to ensure that no sensitive items or designs reach Iran, especially from China, Russia and Pakistan.

 

As a country wedged between five nuclear-weapons states — Israel, Russia, China, Pakistan and India — and part of U.S. President George W. Bush's "axis of evil" and regime-change approach, Iran has an entrenched proclivity to play nuclear politics. But the international effort should be to blunt rather than sharpen the very card that helped bring Ahmadinejad to power — nuclear nationalism.

 

Fwd: Indic Influence on greek thought

jan 23

aren't you shocked to hear that the greek learned anything from indians? you'd never think, to read indian textbooks. fact of the matter is that even much greek astronomy is borrowed from india, not to mention mathematics. some greek bigwigs talk about going to india for instruction, too.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: d
Subject: Indic Influence on greek thought
To: Rajeev.srinivasan@gmail.com

Dear Rajeev
 
Thought this might interest you, esp in a world where Indians take pride in knowing Greek mytho/philo, and not knowing Hindu mytho/philo...
 
 

Sunday, January 22, 2006

Fwd: Spice scam, Land loot etc..

jan 22nd

kerala should be renamed "k m mani/oommen chandy land". because after all they own most of it.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rama

[ Usual suspects, usual victims. Suspects will surely escape the law using their community politicians like Oomen Chandy, KM Mani]
 
Auction agency spreads stink of scam

J Gopikrishnan/ Thiruvananthapuram (Daily Pioneer)

A huge scam, involving a swindling of moneys to the tune of Rs 70 crore, is shaking the cardamom hills of Kerala, putting the CBI, State police and the controlling body, Spice Board, in a tight spot. The inevitable political tones are present very much, with leaders from the State as well as Tamil Nadu, cutting across party lines, working overtime to hush up the scam.

The culprit in the scam is the Cardamom Marketing Corporation, a premier global auction centre, which looted the money from more than 300 cardamom growers of Kerala and Tamil Nadu through unauthorised deposit mobilisation and money-lending. This amounted to about Rs 50 crore. Apart from the unauthorised financial deals, the auction centre also swindled more than Rs 20 crore from several nationalised banks, with the connivance of top banking officials.

The Cardamom Marketing Corporation (CMC) at Vandanmedu in Idukki, Kerala has been operating as an auction centre for the past 45 years, playing a pivotal role in controlling cardamom rates in the world spice market. Controversies started when the CMC management failed to return to the cardamom growers the deposits amounting to Rs 50 crore, collected illegally from them.

The fact is that the authorities have all along known that the CMS, licensed by the Spices Board to carry out auction processes, has been involved in illegal deposit mobilisation for the last many years.

"They used to pay us the promised interest at a rate of 18 percent on our deposits every three months. We had also taken loan from CMC at 24 percent rate of interest. But everything collapsed from August 2005," said a reputed planter, who lost more than Rs 3 crore. Most of the investors are now withdrawing from the complaint against the auction centre, obviously due to the difficulty they face to show the source of income.

Superintendent of Police Gopesh Agarwal told The Pioneer that the investigation was a very tedious job because of the non-cooperation of planters, who had deposited huge amounts with the CMC as they are unable to show the source of income.

"We are thinking of handing over the case to the Crime Branch. Only a few persons have lodged complaints. Nobody is coming out with proper documents, as the sums involved are running into crores of rupees," said Mr Agarwal.

Meanwhile, the CBI had conducted raids at the CMC office and seized documents. "It is a suo-moto case. We found great discrepancies in CMC accounts at certain banks. One of the big issues is cheating depositors. But at this stage, nothing can be said," said a CBI official. The CBI had found that the company had defaulted payment to the tune of more than Rs 5 crore at the local branch of the Union Bank of India. The source indicated that evidences of similar frauds were found in the ledgers of the branches of the Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank and the Canara Bank. Banking officials confirmed the CBI observation.

Depositors allege that the investigating agencies are trying to hush up the case due to the mounting pressure from various quarters. "The CBI raided the auction centre and the manager's residence. But it did not initiate any action against the president and treasurer of the auction centre. It raises a lot of doubts," said a depositor.

CMC president refused to discuss the issue, when contacted over phone. "I have nothing to comment. I don't know anything. I have not been going to the auction centre for (the last) many days," was all he would say before disconnecting the line. His brother and CMC treasurer Mathew Scaria was not available for comments.

The controversy came to light when some depositors lodged a petition with Chief Minister Oommen Chandy in December last. However, the State police failed to crack the scam, though they had summoned the management of CMC and the aggrieved depositors.

Auction activity is at a standstill due to the issue. The controlling body, Spices Board, which had received complaints recently, is limiting its investigation to the loss of money incurred by the cardamom farmers. "Our main action would be to settle the dues (of farmers). But if we got evidence on receipt of deposits and money-lending, which is an illegal activity by an auction centre, we would act," said Spices Board chairman CJ Jose. He added that it would reallocate the auction process to some other firms.

"We had produced all kinds of documents to prove that the CMC had illegally collected deposits and had involved in money-lending activity. But no proper action has been taken so far," said Arun Kottor, a cardamom grower who lost a good sum in deposits.

Fwd: Iranian gas, China and India

jan 22nd

ram narayan's friend has some sensible things to say about chinese imperial fantasies and the way they are going about squeezing india by the cojones.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ram
Date: Jan 21, 2006 4:16 AM
Subject: Iranian gas, China and India
To: Undisclosed-Recipient


Dear Friends:

The following analysis by an American friend which came as a reaction to one
of my recent despatches, offers some thoughts that call for careful study by
Indian policymakers.

Ram

----- Original Message -----
From: <Jim Yost>
To: <Ram Narayanan>
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 4:17 AM
Subject: Re: **Have the pro-Chinese nonproliferation ayatollahs overreached
themselves?


Ram,

We already know that China has a stranglehold on Pakistan and Iran, ...
but apparently the grip is even tighter than many suspect, and China is
now tacitly reaching towards India.

How many people know that the Yadavaran gas field, from which the gas to
India would flow,  is predominantly under the control of the Chinese
(via state-run Sinopec) in that they have a 51% (not 50% as most reports
claim) controlling interest?  That 51%, along with the 30% Iranian
interest translates to more than 80% Chinese control.   To confirm that,
in today's Asia Times (20 Jan 05) M.K. Bhadrakumar puts it in these
stark terms, "... Significantly, the Chinese state oil company Sinopec
operates the Yadavaran field."

India, if brought in as a minority partner, would supposedly be allotted
only up to 20% interest.  No doubt, operational and logistical issues
would be decided according to China's wishes since Iran is already
virtually contractually bound to side with the Chinese, otherwise the
deal would not have been struck, ...   Like I said, the Chinese do not
enter into these kinds of things unless they are guaranteed significant
control.  This is proof positive of that.

Now, China is also suggesting that any pipeline to India also include
plans to incorporate a tributary line branching off to China.   Keep
that in mind for a moment.

In addition, not only has China suggested (at a meeting in Delhi in
October 05) that the Iran-Pak-India pipeline be extended to China, ...
China also wants the majority of the construction contracts on the
entire pipeline project. There are hundreds of Chinese in Pakistan
already, working on the Gwadar port project (450 "engineers" and
hundreds of "technicians" - per Asia Times), and if the Chinese do in
fact build most of the pipeline, hundreds more will be going to Iran,
Pakistan, ... and perhaps into India too.

Bells should be going off!   The danger here is that India would be
beholding to two of its supposed adversaries - China and Pakistan, ...
and the pipeline will be the equivalent of one of India's major
arteries.    Possible scenario:  In the event of any sort of volatile
discord arising between India and China, or Pakistan and India, after
completion of the pipeline, China could impose upon Iran or Pakistan
(since part of the pipeline passes through there) to turn off the
India-bound leg of the line.

Did you also know that the Chinese struck a similar deal for control and
development of the offshore South Pars oil and gas fields?    It's bad
enough that the Chinese are building up their presence in Gwadar, on
India's doorstep, now they will have another "chokepoint" in the Persian
Gulf, .... take a look at the location of the South Pars field.
http://www.spdltd.com/images/pages/map/parsmap.gif

If you want to see what the Chinese are really up to, and how the
Chinese develop other maritime projects such as so-called "fishing
grounds" and "oil, gas, and mineral deposit sights," read this:
http://www.afcea.org/signal/articles/anmviewer.asp?a=80&z=30


The recent suggestions by Kerry -- that India should consider
alternatives and/or collateral sources to the Iranian supplies, -- look
to be more for the purpose of protecting India's ability to avoid being
coerced into siding with the Iran-Pakistan-China block. And
considering the volatility of the Iran nuke situation, alternatives
should probably be given serious consideration.   I have a feeling that
the U.S., at least for the time being, will continue to work to
facilitate ramping-up India's nuclear power generation capabilities, ...
and although that would not completely eliminate the need for the gas,
it should provide India with a bit more flexibility in seeking out other
prospective oil/gas sources, or at least sources that do not require
significant capitulation of sovereignty as a term of any contract.

On the other hand, I could see where the Indo-U.S. nuke efforts may
stall out if the U.S. believes that developments down the road could
result in any transferred technology finding its way into
Chinese/Iranian hands, as has happened in the past. Of course, China
would love nothing better than for India to cave-in under the pressure,
thus allowing China to trap India as a dependent "colony" in yet another
exercise in Sino-mercantilism.


Re: Proliferation ...

In the Oct '05 bulletin of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Monitor, Asad Ismi notes that in addition to assisting Iran with the
development of its nuclear program (along with Pakistan) China is
selling Iran sophisticated surface-to-surface and anti-ship missiles,
and, along with Russia, is helping develop Tehran's long-range ballistic
missiles, which will be capable of mounting nuclear warheads.  He also
notes that, ... "the anti-ship missiles can be used in the Straits of
Hormuz - through which 40% of global oil exports are carried."

*** Important note:   Contrary to Iran's claim that they are not
actively developing a nuke weapons capability, they already possess the
nuclear warhead designs!   Not surprisingly, it was supplied by
Pakistan's Khan, furthermore, those plans and design specifications were
supplied to him by the Chinese, they are the same ones Khan provided to
Libya.  See the report by Douglas Jehl in November 27, 2004 issue of the
New York Times: "Pakistanis Gave Iran Nuclear Aid."

Even as the current situation develops, the Russians are also in Iran in
a significant capacity and they continue to lead the construction of the
Bushehr nuclear reactor.

Ismi continues:
" ... While the U.S. and the European Union threaten Iran over its
nuclear energy program, China and Russia support it.   Both countries
have made clear that they will not back United Nations resolutions or
sanctions against Iran for its nuclear program.   China and Russia hold
veto power in the UN Security Council.  As the Asia Times is reporting:
"The endorsement of Tehran's nuclear energy program by Moscow and
Beijing reveals the primary impetus behind the China-Iran-Russia axis."

I hope India doesn't get drawn into that China-Iran-Russia "axis," ...
but the U.S. must assist in providing India with a way out by offering
viable alternatives and options.

Regards,

Jim

gross misuse of dowry laws in India

jan 22nd

interesting mail. i dont have time to write on this right now, but what do you guys think? or all of you young, unmarried, and therefore blissfully unaware of this sort of thing? :-)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: S
Date: Jan 19, 2006 10:44 PM
Subject: Please write a column on the gross misuse of dowry laws in India
To: Rajeev.srinivasan@gmail.com

Hi Rajeev,
 
 I do not know if you will get time to read my mail. But I would like you to please write an article in rediff highlighting the gross misuse of dowry laws in India.
 
 I am approaching you to write an article on the gross human right violations (harassment of husband and his family by wife and her relatives) in India and in the US (of person of Indian origin) in a marriage that has gone sour.  One such article written by Lisa Tsering can be looked reached at: http://news.ncmonline.com/news/view_article.html?article_id=768649893bc5975ce97b6bff5354c210
 
  Influenced by women organizations and seeking women votes (vote-politics) Indian Government passed a law (known as section 498a) to eliminate the dowry problem in India. Passed by Indian Parliament in 1983, Indian Penal Code 498A, is a criminal law (not a civil law) which is defined as:
"Whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extent to may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine. The offence is Cognizable, non-compoundable and non-bailable.
498a can only be invoked by wife/daughter-in-law or her relative. Most cases where Sec 498A is invoked turn out to be false (as repeatedly accepted by High Courts and Supreme Court in India) as they are mere blackmail attempts by the wife (or her close relatives) when faced with a crumbling marriage.   In most cases 498a complaint is followed by the demand of huge amount of money (extortion) to settle the case out of the court. This section is non-bailable, non-compoundable (complaint can't be quashed) and cognizable (arrests without investigation or warrants). There have been countless instances where, without any investigation, the police has arrested elderly parents, unmarried sisters, pregnant sister-in-laws and 3 year old children. In these cases unsuspecting family of husband has to go through a lot of mental torture and harassment by the corrupt Indian legal system. A typical case goes on for years (5-7 years is typical) and the conviction rate is about 2% only. Some accused parents, sisters and even husbands have committed suicide after time in jail.
The very nature of this anti-dowry law makes it wife-biased (daughter-in-law baised), discriminatory, stringent, unprecedented, exceptional and poorly formulated. This section of law has become a very powerful tool for misuse for the following reasons:
·        Onus is on the husband and his family members to disprove the false allegations. Well how does anybody disprove that he did'nt try to extort money or he did'nt harass his wife.
·        Even when the case is dismissed for lack of evidence or any other reason, the plaintiff cannot be sued for misuse of legal system.
·        The first thing the police does in such a case is that it arrests the accused without bail. Bail can only be granted in a court hearing.
·        This section of law was made to curb the practice of dowry, but the reality is that the section of population which it was supposed to protect is still unable to use this law, and on the other hand girls coming from a well educated, affluent families have found a potent tool to seek revenge in the case there is marital discord and is imminent to lead to a divorce.
Some of most common problems Indian husband has to go through are:
a)       Passport is impounded so he cannot leave the country. There have been cases where non-resident Indians lost their jobs because they were held back in India and could not join their jobs back in the foreign land. Please check out the US department of state warning to people traveling to India for marriage related issues. http://communitydispatch.com/artman/publish/article_1754.shtml
b)      A study done by WHO has found that this is one of the ways elders are abused in India.                  http://www.who.int/ageing/projects/elder_abuse/alc_ea_ind.pdf )
c)       Husband or anyone named in the FIR (First Information report) who is in a government job loses his job (if he spends a single day in jail) as per the government policy.
d)      Divorce has been a losing preposition for husband now especially because most of the divorce cases have 498a cases involved with them.
And it has especially affected Indians in the US, who are effluent, hardworking people who are in the US from various prestigious institutes like IITs (Indian Institute of Technology) and earn good, people who would rather not get involved in all this mess which will only be detrimental to their lives and career.  
Please visit http://www.498a.org to get a complete picture of this social menace which is termed as 'legal terrorism' by the Supreme Court of India. This website has almost all the information you need to write a balanced article to expose this problem.  Please do not hesitate to reach me if I could be of any help to answer any of your questions. If you think there is someone else who may be better suited to represent this matter, please feel free to forward this mail to that person.
Waiting for you opinion and article in this matter.
 
- Satya
 



What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos

Kashmir in Economist

jan 22nd

simon long wants us to give kashmir to pakistan. no skin off his nose, of course.

we should make a deal with the brits: we'll give kashmir to pakistan when you give londonistan to the mullahs.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Raj

http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_VQNNSJD

Kashmir

The long game
Jan 19th 2006 | DELHI
>From The Economist print edition


A glimpse of a Kashmir settlement, if India wants one
                                                                 Reuters
Reuters
As good as it gets



THE latest series of five-day cricket matches between India and Pakistan
began on January 13th with two days of aggressive Pakistani batting.
When its turn came, India had no choice but to try to avoid defeat by
batting out the match. The two countries' peace process seems to be
running on similar lines. Adventurous Pakistani diplomacy tries to force
a result: India plays for time.

On January 17th, the neighbours' most senior diplomats met in Delhi for
the latest talks in a two-year old "composite dialogue". The two sides
have made great strides in establishing confidence-building measures,
such as cricket matches. But there is little sign of real progress on
the dispute that has soured their relations for nearly 60 years: divided
Kashmir.

Pakistan's president, Pervez Musharraf, has often expressed frustration,
and keeps coming up with ideas, which India sniffily rejects or ignores.
Yet the general's latest musing, which, typically, was spelled out in a
television interview earlier this month, is tantalisingly close to
something India could, in theory, accept. India's prime minister,
Manmohan Singh, insists that there can be no redrawing of international
boundaries, ie, of the "line of control", disputed by Pakistan, that
divides Kashmir in the absence of an agreed border. General Musharraf's
latest formulation accepts this. He argues instead for
"self-governance" (which, he says cryptically, "falls in between
autonomy and independence") in both Indian- and Pakistani-controlled
Kashmir and a period of "joint management" of some subjects by India,
Pakistan and Kashmiris themselves.

India resents General Musharraf's habit of conducting his diplomacy
through television interviews and refused to comment on this. But it
does seem to contain at least a basis for negotiation, which in the past
has been missing. The climate, however, does not seem conducive to a
breakthrough. The general raised Indian hackles by suggesting again that
India should "demilitarise" some of Kashmir, pointing out that
"self-governance" will hardly be possible with hundreds of thousands of
Indian soldiers there.

Indian patience was already strained by what it says is continued
Pakistan-inspired terrorism in Kashmir itself as well as a co-ordinated
bombing in Delhi last October, in which more than 60 people died, and a
gun attack in a science institute in Bangalore in December. The general
himself had been incensed by India's expression of concern about the
"spiralling violence" in Baluchistan, and in turn accused India of
financing and training insurgents, which India denies.

This exchange of accusations recalled the bad old days before the peace
process was launched in 2003. But the talks in Delhi made some progress,
with discussion of more confidence-building measures, such as the
opening of new crossing-points on the line of control, and an Indian
proposal to halt building of new army posts along it. A bus that
sporadically links the capitals of the two parts of Kashmir remains the
most visible sign of progress.

None of this, however, is likely to mollify Pakistani critics of the
peace process, who suspect that India has no real interest in a Kashmir
settlement, sees the peace process as an effective means of avoiding
one, and strings the general along.

Nor can India point to much progress in efforts to repair relations
between Delhi and Indian-held Kashmir. Mr Singh met the main separatist
group, the All-Party Hurriyat Conference, last September, but there has
been no follow-up. On January 14th he met Sajjad Lone, a Kashmiri
separatist leader who has fallen out with the Hurriyat. This was
portrayed as part of an effort to engage all sides of Kashmiri opinion.
That is a worthy aim. But it is taking a very long time, and many
Kashmiris, as well as Pakistanis, are in a hurry.


Mark Twain: a Brahmin's memory

jan 22nd

interesting anecdote from mark twain. he was rather impressed by india, i think.

apart from the performing-monkey bit (almonds?) it shows the mental feats indians have always been capable of. and not just brahmins, mind you :-)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mi

Mark Twain: "Following The Equator"

CHAPTER II: Change of Costume - Fish, Snake, and Boomerang
Stories - Tests of Memory - A Brahmin Expert - General Grant's
Memory - A Delicately Improper Tale

When in doubt, tell the truth.
- Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar.

About four days out from Victoria we plunged into hot weather,
and all the male passengers put on white linen clothes. One or
two days later we crossed the 25th parallel of north latitude,
and then, by order, the officers of the ship laid away their
blue uniforms and came out in white linen ones. All the ladies
were in white by this time. This prevalence of snowy costumes
gave the promenade deck an invitingly cool, and cheerful and
picnicky aspect.
[...]

The talk passed from the boomerang to dreams - usually a
fruitful subject, afloat or ashore - but this time the output
was poor. Then it passed to instances of extraordinary memory -
with better results. Blind Tom, the negro pianist, was spoken
of, and it was said that he could accurately play any piece of
music, howsoever long and difficult, after hearing it once; and
that six months later he could accurately play it again, without
having touched it in the interval. One of the most striking of
the stories told was furnished by a gentleman who had served on
the staff of the Viceroy of India. He read the details from his
note-book, and explained that he had written them down, right
after the consummation of the incident which they described,
because he thought that if he did not put them down in black and
white he might presently come to think he had dreamed them or
invented them.

The Viceroy was making a progress, and among the shows offered
by the Maharajah of Mysore for his entertainment was a
memory-exhibition. The Viceroy and thirty gentlemen of his suite
sat in a row, and the memory expert, a high-caste Brahmin, was
brought in and seated on the floor in front of them. He said he
knew but two languages, the English and his own, but would not
exclude any foreign tongue from the tests to be applied to his
memory. Then he laid before the assemblage his program - a
sufficiently extraordinary one. He proposed that one gentleman
should give him one word of a foreign sentence, and tell him its
place in the sentence. He was furnished with the French word
'est', and was told it was second in a sentence of three words.
The next, gentleman gave him the German word 'verloren' and said
it was the third in a sentence of four words. He asked the next
gentleman for one detail in a sum in addition; another for one
detail in a sum of subtraction; others for single details in
mathematical problems of various kinds; he got them.
Intermediates gave him single words from sentences in Greek,
Latin, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, and other languages, and
told him their places in the sentences. When at last everybody
had furnished him a single rag from a foreign sentence or a
figure from a problem, he went over the ground again, and got a
second word and a second figure and was told their places in the
sentences and the sums; and so on and so on. He went over the
ground again and again until he had collected all the parts of
the sums and all the parts of the sentences - and all in
disorder, of course, not in their proper rotation. This had
occupied two hours.

The Brahmin now sat silent and thinking, a while, then began and
repeated all the sentences, placing the words in their proper
order, and untangled the disordered arithmetical problems and
gave accurate answers to them all.

In the beginning he had asked the company to throw almonds at
him during the two hours, he to remember how many each gentleman
had thrown; but none were thrown, for the Viceroy said that the
test would be a sufficiently severe strain without adding that
burden to it.


Land grab

jan 22nd

'religion of love and land-grabbing' in action

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: R

LDF, UDF shielding land grabbers
Wednesday January 4 2006 10:57 IST
IDUKKI: The Cardamom Hill Reserve is a victim of the bipolar politics of the state. The CPM-led LDF and the Congress-dominated UDF, which have ruled the state in alternate terms since 1970, have enacted many laws and amended existing ones to protect forests, including the CHR.

But the laws are never implemented because the coalition partner which claims to be the champion of settlers' causes shoots down any move that will restrict the 'rights' of settlers.

No government wants to force the issue for fear of antagonising the settlers who constitute a decisive vote bank.

Shockingly, it is not the settlers but the land grabbers who benefit from the government inaction.

They continue to encroach on CHR land under the provisions of the Land Conservancy Act and Rules for Lease of the Government Land for Cardamom Cultivation 1961 despite the enactment of the Forest (Conservation) Act by Parliament in 1980.

First, they encroach on the CHR land and when they get booked under the provisions of the Land Conservancy Act pay a meagre fine.

This entitles them to hold the encroached land under the Rules for Lease of the Government Land for Cardamom Cultivation which states: 'Land in the possession of encroachers who have cultivated the same with cardamom may be leased to them, without auction, for a period of 20 years.'

Further, under the rule, the encroacher is free to fell trees or undergrowth except teak, ebony, black wood (rosewood) or sandalwood without the prior permission of the Revenue Division Officer.

The dual control of Revenue and Forest Departments over the Cardamom Hill Reserve opens the door wider for the encroachers.

The system was first introduced by the Travancore Government in 1903 to streamline revenue collection from the cardamom crop.

Till the enactment of Rule of Lease of the Government Land for Cardamom Cultivation in 1961, the Forest Department controlled non-forest activities in the CHR.

The new rule has stripped the Forest Department of almost all power and given enormous jurisdiction to the Revenue Department.

It authorises the Revenue Divisional Officer, Devikulam, to conduct all business related to the cardamom lease in the assignable area of the CHR.

Unlike Forest personnel, Revenue staff are mostly confined to their offices and have practically no idea whether any violation of the Rule is taking place. Statistics show that land grabbing in the CHR has been rampant during the UDF rule.

Though all LDF governments vowed stern action against land grabbers, they did nothing to clip the wings of encroachers.

In the last 300 years, the Cardamom Hill Reserve has seen many confrontations and struggles. But the damage inflicted on the region by human interference in 250 years is less than the harm caused by land grabbers in the last 50 years.

http://newindpress.com/NewsItems.asp?ID=IER20060104003627&Page=R&Title=Kerala&Topic=0 &


 

Fwd: Distorting to claim a mythical history

jan 22nd

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: R
 
 
Distorting to claim a mythical history
Dr. C.I. Issac

The religious minorities of Kerala, particularly Christians and Muslims, are proud of their historical past. However, these days they have started to feel a sense of insufficiency of their historical value. Since the days of Portuguese, stories regarding the first century of Common Era (CE) origin and aristocratic beginning began to circulate widely amongst the Kerala Christians. Later on this articulated tradition got deep rooted with the Christian faith. Scholars even from amongst the Christian community began challenging the historicity of the legend that claims the noble descent and first century origin of Indian (Kerala) Christianity. Those who supported the first century origin of Christianity mainly highlighted some mystifying stories related to certain saints and churches. The veracity of the stories associated with these monuments is doubtful. This is because the architectural style that was adopted in constructing these churches (structures) does not match the style that prevailed in that period.

Similarly, the Muslims of Kerala were a peace loving national community until the days of the expeditions of Hyder Ali and Tippu Sultan. Thereafter, they were forced to transform themselves into fanatics. The seeds of fanaticism that were sowed by the Mysorian invaders were reaped in the bumper harvest during the days of the Mopla Riot of 1921 (Malabar Riot). The Muslim fanatics who were at the front of the Hindu massacre during the course of the Malabar Riot are now christened as freedom fighters and comrades, respectively, by the Right and Left coalitions of Kerala. This is the thumbnail portrait of the contemporary politico-social structure of the Muslim social formations of Kerala. But recently as a result of the GEB (Gulf Economic Boom), the Muslim community of Kerala also began to think of rewriting their history by incorporating the story of a rich and distant past. As the Christians of Kerala did they also coddled themselves in fabricating a so-called history of Islam in Kerala – a history of Hindu kings converting to Islam and attributed antique value to a few of their mosques.

In order to evade enquiries from the students of history, such monuments of religious importance are being demolished without preserving the relics of antique value and new and lofty structures are being contructed in their place with granite slabs (with inscriptions on them) claiming that at the site of the new building there was another one dating back to the days of the founder of their religion. Today the process of the demolition of churches and mosques is happening at an extensive and unprecedented rate. A set of would be secular historians with vested interest is supporting the Christian and Muslim historio-graphical exercise (distortions). All these necessitated an enquiry into the antique values of the Christian and Muslim places of worship that are subject to the demolition exercise and into the (religious hierarchical) social psychology behind their reconstruction. ...................................
 

Saturday, January 21, 2006

Big fight -Ndtv; the eye of the mohammedan

jan 21st

the lions who maul the so-called 'hindu fundamentalists' turn into lambs when they encounter mohammedan fundamentalists.

by the way, the kerala mohammedan's eye has been saved. the other party, the arab who lost his eye, has pardoned him based on the saudi govt's intervention.

yea, verily is it said that allah is merciful.

and i am sure e ahamed (de facto foreign minister, who had no time to listen when the man was kidnapped by taliban) will tell that to maniappan kutty's family.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: sandeep k

hi Mr rajeev
today our elite secular NDTV( of pranoy roy whoz of course related commie brinda ) went to saudi arabia to find out for themselves the problems of indians working there .... anywaz they was usual stuff of workers being duped by agents  et all and there was the wife of tht bloke whoz eyes are going to removed after her appeal the saudi arabian rep said tht the law ... Vow no more justification .. then there was even more vikram chandra asked whats status of minorities in saudi arabia to which reply was .. great... then question was why cant they have their places of worship to which the answer to since saudi arabia was the holy land which housed the holy mosques they cant be any other place of worship in fact the saudi asked is there any thing in vatican... honestly if i was in vikram chandra place i would have asked what abt ayodhya kashi mathura then  .... but not to be  the show itself was not usual big fight look where teesta setvald and plas come and rant against gujrat the whole ambience in saudi arabia  was all too soft .. all particpants sitting on  sofa ... and finally this takes the cake .. vikram chandra ends the show by saying  before  coming to saudi arabia i had miscocetions now its cleared  VOOWWW.. vikram chandra what can i say
cheers

--
sandeep

nytimes: Wayward Christian Soldiers

jan 21st

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: g




http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/20/opinion/20marsh.html

NY Times (January 20, 2006)

Wayward Christian Soldiers
By CHARLES MARSH

In the past several years, American evangelicals, and I am one of them,
have amassed greater political power than at any time in our history. But
at what cost to our witness and the integrity of our message?

Recently, I took a few days to reread the war sermons delivered by
influential evangelical ministers during the lead up to the Iraq war. That
period, from the fall of 2002 through the spring of 2003, is not one I will
remember fondly. Many of the most respected voices in American evangelical
circles blessed the president's war plans, even when doing so required them
to recast Christian doctrine.

Charles Stanley, pastor of the First Baptist Church of Atlanta, whose
weekly sermons are seen by millions of television viewers, led the charge
with particular fervor. "We should offer to serve the war effort in any way
possible," said Mr. Stanley, a former president of the Southern Baptist
Convention. "God battles with people who oppose him, who fight against him
and his followers." In an article carried by the convention's Baptist Press
news service, a missionary wrote that "American foreign policy and military
might have opened an opportunity for the Gospel in the land of Abraham,
Isaac and Jacob."

As if working from a slate of evangelical talking points, both Franklin
Graham, the evangelist and son of Billy Graham, and Marvin Olasky, the
editor of the conservative World magazine and a former advisor to President
Bush on faith-based policy, echoed these sentiments, claiming that the
American invasion of Iraq would create exciting new prospects for
proselytizing Muslims. Tim LaHaye, the co-author of the hugely popular
"Left Behind" series, spoke of Iraq as "a focal point of end-time events,"
whose special role in the earth's final days will become clear after
invasion, conquest and reconstruction. For his part, Jerry Falwell boasted
that "God is pro-war" in the title of an essay he wrote in 2004.

The war sermons rallied the evangelical congregations behind the invasion
of Iraq. An astonishing 87 percent of all white evangelical Christians in
the United States supported the president's decision in April 2003. Recent
polls indicate that 68 percent of white evangelicals continue to support
the war. But what surprised me, looking at these sermons nearly three years
later, was how little attention they paid to actual Christian moral
doctrine. Some tried to square the American invasion with Christian "just
war" theory, but such efforts could never quite reckon with the criterion
that force must only be used as a last resort. As a result, many ministers
dismissed the theory as no longer relevant.

Some preachers tried to link Saddam Hussein with wicked King Nebuchadnezzar
of Biblical fame, but these arguments depended on esoteric interpretations
of the Old Testament book of II Kings and could not easily be reduced to
the kinds of catchy phrases that are projected onto video screens in vast
evangelical churches. The single common theme among the war sermons
appeared to be this: our president is a real brother in Christ, and because
he has discerned that God's will is for our nation to be at war against
Iraq, we shall gloriously comply.

Such sentiments are a far cry from those expressed in the Lausanne Covenant
of 1974. More than 2,300 evangelical leaders from 150 countries signed that
statement, the most significant milestone in the movement's history.
Convened by Billy Graham and led by John Stott, the revered Anglican
evangelical priest and writer, the signatories affirmed the global
character of the church of Jesus Christ and the belief that "the church is
the community of God's people rather than an institution, and must not be
identified with any particular culture, social or political system, or
human ideology."

On this page, David Brooks correctly noted that if evangelicals elected a
pope, it would most likely be Mr. Stott, who is the author of more than 40
books on evangelical theology and Christian devotion. Unlike the Pope John
Paul II, who said that invading Iraq would violate Catholic moral teaching
and threaten "the fate of humanity," or even Pope Benedict XVI, who has
said there were "not sufficient reasons to unleash a war against Iraq," Mr.
Stott did not speak publicly on the war. But in a recent interview, he
shared with me his abiding concerns.

"Privately, in the days preceding the invasion, I had hoped that no action
would be taken without United Nations authorization," he told me. "I
believed then and now that the American and British governments erred in
proceeding without United Nations approval." Reverend Stott referred me to
"War and Rumors of War, " a chapter from his 1999 book, "New Issues Facing
Christians Today," as the best account of his position. In that essay he
wrote that the Christian community's primary mission must be "to hunger for
righteousness, to pursue peace, to forbear revenge, to love enemies, in
other words, to be marked by the cross."

What will it take for evangelicals in the United States to recognize our
mistaken loyalty? We have increasingly isolated ourselves from the shared
faith of the global Church, and there is no denying that our Faustian
bargain for access and power has undermined the credibility of our moral
and evangelistic witness in the world. The Hebrew prophets might call us to
repentance, but repentance is a tough demand for a people utterly convinced
of their righteousness.

Charles Marsh, a professor of religion at the University of Virginia, is
the author of "The Beloved Community: How Faith Shapes Social Justice, from
the Civil Rights Movement to Today."


pioneer: India under siege

jan 21st

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: M


India is under siege

Sunanda K Datta-Ray

The economy may be booming - albeit with areas of
darkness and deprivation - but, politically and
psychologically, India is under siege. The aggravation
of such episodes in places like Bangalore, far from
the epicentre of previous disturbances, and the choice
of target (an institution of educational excellence)
suggests that terrorist attacks may not be unconnected
with economic achievement. The challenge being both
foreign and domestic demands responses on both fronts,
taking care not to exacerbate the communal situation.




Small, landlocked and vulnerable Bhutan is probably
the only South Asian country whose territory is not
used to launch assaults of one kind or another against
India. All the other neighbours are somehow complicit
in actions that seek to undermine Indian confidence.
The conspiracy theory can be overdone of course. There
was no reason in the seventies for Indira Gandhi and
her advisers to scream of "encirclement". India was
too inconsequential then, and it was the Soviet Union
that the United States and China were targeting. But
if India has always been paranoid, as Henry Kissinger
famously said, even paranoiacs have enemies.



That is no longer a matter for conjecture as ancient
hostility links with modern rivalry in trying to tie
down a rising power in a domestic morass. As a New
York Times writer put it recently, "the great race of
the 21st century is under way between China and India
to see which will be the leading power in the world in
the year 2100." That is one aspect of the foreign
challenge. The more obvious menace is Pakistan whose
entire existence is predicated now, as in 1947, on
contradistinction to India. It is the Other because
apart from the eroded claim of providing a homeland
for all the subcontinent's Muslims, it still has no
raison d'être as a nation.



Military and nuclear collusion between the two was
acknowledged even by the American Central Intelligence
Agency. If Pakistan sought the great equaliser against
India, China found it expedient to further that aim
with help in missile development and reactor equipment
and technology. No wonder Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto called
the agreement with China his "greatest achievement and
contribution to the survival of our people and our
nation."



Even Gary Milhollin, director of Wisconsin's project
on nuclear arms control and not noticeably well
disposed towards India, conceded that if Chinese
assistance were removed Pakistan was left with no
nuclear programme. The Khushab nuclear reactor,
Farahjung missile plant and Shaheen missile owed
everything to China.



China's interest was not only philanthropic. An India
with pressing threats in its immediate neighbourhood
would be less of a player in the global great game
that the New York Times describes. There is less
evidence of China's involvement in current terrorist
attacks, but the attacks may not be unwelcome to a
power that has set up a ring of military posts in the
seas surrounding India, from the Coco Islands leased
from Myanmar to Gwadar in Balochistan.



True, terrorism is a worldwide phenomenon. But just as
the Clinton Administration persistently chose to
ignore Sino-Pakistani missile and nuclear collusion in
violation of international treaties and bilateral
assurances, the Bush Administration's "war on terror"
pays scant attention to Pakistan's pre-eminent role in
this field.



According to the Strategic Foresight Group, there are
between 40,000 and 50,000 madarsas in Pakistan, with
two million students from whom about 15,000 join
terrorist organisations every year. The US commission
set up after the Twin Tower attack acknowledged that
"some of the madarsas have been used as incubators for
violent extremism."



Pakistan has responded to American and British
pressure by taking some measures to curb
fundamentalism. All madarsas must now be registered
and account for donations. Foreign pupils who do not
fulfil the prescribed conditions are supposed to leave
the country. The United Nations Security Council's
anti-terror resolution of September 2005 obliged
Pervez Musharraf to promise tighter measures,
especially of fiscal control. India often leans
backwards to pay tribute to the effectiveness of these
measures, Pranab Mukherjee recently testifying to a
supposed decline in terrorist activity.



What placation overlooks is the greater sophistication
of Pakistani tactics. The hijacking of IC 814
confirmed the abuse of Nepalese territory - and its
1,850-km open border with India - for sabotage and
subversion. Recent reports in this newspaper confirmed
the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence Bureau's
plans to extend operations to Sri Lanka. Bangladesh's
rampant fundamentalists already threaten eastern and
northeastern India. The agents who have been caught
can represent only the tip of the iceberg. The
4,095-km open border presents no obstacle to saboteurs
and political infiltrators among thousands of economic
refugees.



A delegation of Bangladeshi Hindus that visited India
soon after Begum Khaleda Zia's election to warn of
dangers that were building up was given short shrift:
New Delhi did not want to rock the gas pipeline boat.
Similarly, India is anxious not to jeopardise the
so-called peace process with Pakistan. But goodwill
gestures have only encouraged Gen Musharraf to seek
the withdrawal of Indian troops from Kupwara and
Baramula districts.



India's many mistakes in handling Jammu & Kashmir need
not be discussed in the context of the threat, direct
and insidious, that Pakistan poses. What should be
clear by now is that for all its flattering rhetoric,
the US will not help to contain the problem. Partly,
this is because, now as before, Pakistan is too
valuable an ally to be alienated. Partly, too, deep
down, Americans like the British, believe that "Muslim
Kashmir" belongs to Islamic Pakistan. We have not been
able to convince the West otherwise in 48 years and
will not do so now.



Our security is, therefore, in our hands. India cannot
afford to be mealy-mouthed with Nepal, Sri Lanka or
Bangladesh. They must be told to expect the
consequences if they allow their territory and
facilities to be used to India's disadvantage.
Firmness with Pakistan must take the form of refusing
to fraternise whether in the negotiating room, the
cricket field or bogies of the Samjhauta Express
unless there is a complete end to all forms of
invidious activity. That will offend the Americans,
but so did Pokharan II.



There remains the problem of infiltrators and the even
more serious matter of those who give them asylum. It
is a daunting and delicate challenge illustrating the
extent to which the enemy without and the enemy within
are sometimes one and the same. No other country in
the world is similarly threatened. India must handle
the task with the utmost circumspection, remembering
always the pride it takes in demographic diversity and
the dangerous communal implications here of Sartre's
pertinent warning that France's Jewish problem was
ultimately a Gentile one.






Agricultural Income Tax

jan 21st

interesting and unusual topic. certainly there are some very rich 'farmers' in kerala -- mostly christists who grabbed public land and got KM Mani to bless these with official grant deeds. and they have huge plantations on which they pay no taxes.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Benjamin P 


POLITICS OF AGRICULTUAL INCOME TAX*

(Vijay Times, Jan. 18, 2006)

P.N.BENJAMIN

The image of a farmer that conjures up in our mind is that of a poor man in
tatters living in a mud house with a large family, heavily indebted and
barely able to make both ends meet. But, over the years, and with facilities
offered by the government, that image has changed. There are on the
contrary, farmers who are not only well off but are wealthier than many
businessmen. And yet they do not pay any income tax.

Not that there are no farmers who fit into this description now. And the
poor farmer in his tatters, cultivating the small plot of land inherited
from his forefathers, is not going to pay any tax in any case. Perhaps,
their number was too large and the government of the day may have thought
that no worthwhile revenue will come by imposing income tax on agricultural
income.

One of the norms of taxation, according to economists, is the ability of the
taxpayer to pay. The case for direct taxation of agriculture rests on the
fact that this sector of the economy is under-taxed. Economists have
empirically demonstrated that the tax burden on the Indian agricultural
sector is much lower than that on the non-agricultural sector and that
inter-class inequity in tax burdens exists between the two sectors. The
disparity becomes yet more glaring when we note that agriculture receives in
public expenditures more than it pays in taxes while for the
non-agricultural sector as a whole in the situation is quite the reverse.

There are farmers who are not only well off but are wealthier than many
businessmen. And yet, they do not pay any income taxes. They get away
without paying anything at all. It is partly the absence of tax that has
allowed the farmers to get rich at the cost of the exchequer.  The exemption
of agricultural income from income tax means that the exchequer is deprived
of a large chunk of revenue, besides making the tax system inequitable.

A survey made by the National Council of Applied Research some time ago
revealed that nearly 80 per cent of the cultivator households are poor and
cannot provide any support to the budget. It is the top eight per cent of
the household in the agricultural sector that can make all the difference.
They are in the upper middle or high- income bracket and their number
exceeds 45 lakhs.

The rich agriculturists are not contributing to the national exchequer in
the form of income tax. They have enriched themselves by cornering the
enormous benefits emanating from the massive doses of infrastructure
investments as well as incentives to use fertilisers, to irrigate land, and
assured minimum price for his product so that he could plan his crops and
derive the maximum benefit from cultivation. The inputs were subsidised and
the output was overpriced.

What would be the budget gain if agricultural income were subject to income
tax the same way other incomes are? Taxes are paid by households in the
high-income bracket. As such, the gain to the budget would be in the same
proportion as the number of agricultural households in the high-income
bracket. That number is more than 25 per cent. It is the rest 75 per cent
that has generated the income tax revenue for the government. With the
present rates the exchequer should be able to mop up an estimated additional
Rs.1, 00,000 crores after the extension of income taxes to agriculture.
Exemption of agricultural income from taxation is thus a heavy loss to the
exchequer and a great inequity in the tax system. So much for the economics
of agricultural taxation.

Clearly a small section of the agricultural population has the ability to
pay taxes. Why does not the government make them pay income tax? This brings
us to the politics of agricultural taxation. The problem is not that the
government is not convinced that the farmer too must make his contribution
to the budget but lacks political will to make the change. The farmer is the
biggest vote bank and any government that annoys him is unlikely to be
looked upon with sympathy. But the absence of tax has created islands of
opulence within the agricultural sector and it is time that someone develops
the nerve to initiate a bold programme, which ends discrimination among
taxpayers.

Under the Constitution agricultural taxation falls in the State List. It is
under the purview of the respective State governments to levy agricultural
taxation. Though in some States, attempts have been made in the past to
introduce agricultural income tax, the instances are few and far removed.

The governments have not been too eager to introduce agricultural income tax
for that would mean alienation of the rural rich who dominate the
countryside and have considerable power and sway over the rural 'vote bank'
against anyone who antagonises them. And the successive governments at the
Centre, guided again and again by the same motive, have not been prepared to
take the erring States to task.

By not introducing agricultural income tax, our governments are playing to
the sectarian interests against the larger interests of society. But then in
politics, one has to appease dominant sections, even if the broader
interests of society have to be sacrificed. Otherwise one runs the risk of
being thrown out of power. And this is a fact not many politicians will
compromise with.

Way back in 1972, the government had appointed a committee to inquire into
the question of taxing agricultural income. The committee, which was headed
by Dr. K.N.Raj, made some very fine recommendations. Then came the Kelkar
committee in 2002. It recommended that the big farmers should be included
among those paying income tax. Mr. Kelkar said the agricultural income of
non-agriculturists was increasingly used as tax shields for laundering
funds. To tax these incomes, the states could pass a resolution under
Article 252 of the Constitution authorising the Centre to impose tax on
agricultural income. All such taxes collected by the Centre could be
assigned to the states Needless to add, the government did not act on the
recommendations.

P.N.BENJAMIN
benjaminpn@hotmail.com


Friday, January 20, 2006

Emerging Conflict in Pakistan: New Carnegie Paper Analyzes Baluchistan's Resurgent Nationalism

jan 20th

i havent read this paper, it was forwarded to me by someone.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: G




From: "Jennifer Linker" < jlinker@carnegieendowment.org>
Subject: Emerging Conflict in Pakistan: New Carnegie Paper Analyzes Baluchistan's Resurgent Nationalism
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:06:20 -0500

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 01/20/06

CONTACT: Jennifer Linker, + 1 202/939-2372, jlinker@CarnegieEndowment.org

 

Emerging Conflict in Pakistani Province

New Carnegie Paper Analyzes Baluchistan's Resurgent Nationalism

 

A new conflict is emerging in Baluchistan, a vast yet sparsely populated Pakistani province, straddling three countries: Pakistan, Iran, and Afghanistan. This instability has potential implications for the United States, as it is a launching pad for U.S. military operations against Islamic terrorism.

 

In a new Carnegie Paper, Pakistan: The Resurgence of Baluch Nationalism , Visiting Scholar Frédéric Grare provides insight to the numerous factors that have led to the complex struggle between the Pakistani government and the Baluch population's fight for independence. This conflict in the energy rich province could affect many countries in the region and the international community. Click here to read.

 

Grare first argues that today's crisis in Baluchistan was provoked by three fundamental issues: expropriation of land, demographic marginalization, and dispossession of resources.

 

A significant aspect of this struggle, according to Grare, pertains to the exploitation of Islam. The Pakistan Army has launched a disinformation campaign linking Baluch nationalist militancy to Islamic terrorism to conceal the real nature of the Baluch problem.

 

Pakistan has charged that Iran and India finance the Baluch rebels. No evidence supports any of these charges. Baluch nationalism is a reality and the present crisis is the result of the incomplete integration and lack of democracy in Pakistan.

 

Grare concludes that were Baluchistan to become independent, Pakistan would lose a major part of its natural resources and Baluchistan would become a new zone of instability in the region.

 

Direct link to paper: http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/CP65.Grare.FINAL.pdf

 

Frédéric Grare is a visiting scholar with the Carnegie Endowment. A leading expert and writer on South Asia, Grare served most recently in the French Embassy in Pakistan and, from 1999 to 2003, in New Delhi as director of the Centre for Social Sciences and Humanities. Grare edited the volume India, China, Russia: Intricacies of an Asian Triangle

###

 

 




gopals and cults

jan 20th

apparently there are two people named gopal who write comments on this blog.

the one that has pissed off people with his bizarre comments here is a kid, a graduate student in the us. he is the one who deserves the comment about ignorance/stupidity engendering certainty.

the second, new gopal, is a different person altogether. he is the one who wants to take the battle to the other side and change the rules of the game, fine sentiments indeed.

however, as pointed out by bodhi dharma, the new gopal's blog celebrates christist kathakali! yes, christist kathakali, an oxymoron if there ever was one.

i think this is an abomination. abusing and misusing sacred hindu techniques for some false religion cum hoax-ridden imperialist cult is an outrage. this is gross cultural expropriation.

imagine if there were reciprocity: would christists modify the medieval 'passion plays' at obammergau (spelling?) to depict the moral dilemmas in the mahabharata? of course not. as seen in the CA textbook scandal or in that moron godman nikon's views, they view hinduism as false, barbaric and satanic.

i return the favor: i view their religion as false, barbaric and satanic.

Thursday, January 19, 2006

watch The Economist crawl and grovel before lee kuan yew

jan 19th

the threat of serious legal attacks is very salutary as far as the press is concerned, as lee kuan yew demonstrates frequently. this is about the fifth time i have seen the lofty and nose-in-the-air Economist grovelling before lee kuan yew. the threat of force being applied to their broad bottoms works very well with press barons.

the right approach to be taken against the indian english media that lies so blatantly is to sue their pants off.

it's unbelieveable that we can't even get that absurd little racist twit witzel -- the word popinjay leaps to mind -- to cease and desist.

in point of fact, devan nair was humiliated and forced into exile. he may have been an alcoholic, but that's normal for a lot of politicians, isn't it? boris yeltsin leaps to mind. once again, the fate of an ethnic indian overseas was of no consequence to the 'secular' indian government. contrast this with what the self-respecting japanese did for ethnic japanese alberto fujimori when he had to be exiled from peru.

since india doesn't respect its culture or its indigenous faiths or people of its ethnicity, why should others? this is one of the pathologies of surrender -- starting off with a world-view (courtesy j nehru and the aryan invasion theory fanatics) that india is ipso facto an inferior nation whose role in life is to be the slaves to the real great powers.



Jan 19th 2006
From The Economist print edition

Devan Nair

SIR – In your obituary you wrote "by Mr Nair's account, Mr Lee promised to crush him [J.B. Jeyaretnam], crying 'I will make him crawl on his bended knees and beg for mercy.' That image had haunted Mr Nair before, as the worst expression of arrogant colonialism" ("Devan Nair", December 24th).

This and many other statements Mr Nair made after his bout of alcoholism in 1985 were unfounded. One statement he made in 1991 forced Mr Lee Kuan Yew to sue him and the Canadian Globe & Mail in Toronto. The matter was settled when Mr Nair's two sons issued this statement, reported in the Globe & Mail on July 1st 2004:

"Mr C.V. Devan Nair, aged 80, has been diagnosed as suffering from the beginning stages of dementia, an ailment which affects his memory. He is no longer able to give evidence in court proceedings.

"On March 29th 1999, the Globe & Mail published an article by Mr Marcus Gee. The article quoted Mr Nair as saying that Mr Lee Kuan Yew had Singapore government doctors slip hallucination drugs to Mr Nair to make him appear befuddled.

"Having reviewed the records, and on the basis of the family's knowledge of the circumstances leading to Mr Nair's resignation as president of Singapore in March 1985, we can declare that there is no basis for this allegation."

Yeong Yoon Ying

Press secretary to Minister Mentor

Singapore

Apology: We recognise that the statements attributed to Mr Lee in the obituary on Devan Nair and which are referred to in Mdm Yeong Yoon Ying's letter above, are false. We apologise to Mr Lee for having published them, and we unreservedly withdraw them. We have agreed to pay Mr Lee damages and to indemnify him for all costs incurred by him in connection with this matter.




British Parliamentarians seek meeting with Foreign Secretary over harassment of Russian Hindus

jan 19th

the 'secular' indian mps have no interest in this. where are the 'secular' fundamentalists who breathe fire over the treatment of 'minorities' in india? the treatment of real minorities elsewhere (eg. hindus in fiji or bangladesh or pakistan) has never bothered them, just as the genocide of balochis doesn't.

british non-hindus are rallying behind hindus.

amazing.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hindu Forum Office < info@hinduforum.org>
Date: Jan 19, 2006 11:19 AM
Subject: British Parliamentarians seek meeting with Foreign Secretary over harassment of Russian Hindus
To: info@hinduforum.org

British Parliamentarians seek meeting with Foreign Secretary over harassment of Russian Hindus

 

18 January 2006 – British Parliamentarians led by Lord Dholakia, Ashok Kumar MP and James Clappison MP will seek a meeting with the Foreign Secretary Jack Straw to discuss the harassment of Russian Hindus and lead a delegation to meet the Russian Ambassador in the UK, it was announced at the launch of the Defend Russian Hindus Campaign at the House of Commons on 18th January. The Campaign which is led by the Hindu Forum of Britain and a number of national and regional Hindu organisations in UK , USA, Australia, Africa and Canada , succeeded in passing a resolution urging the Moscow Government to stop harassment of Russian Hindus and allow them to build a place of worship after it was demolished nearly two years ago. Parliamentarians from all three parties will also file an Early Day Motion in the House of Commons seeking the support of MPS from across the party lines.

 

The launch at the House of Commons was attended by members of the Hindu, Jewish, Muslim and Christian organisations in the UK , who unanimously called for more respect and tolerance to allow Russian Hindus the same right to a place of worship as other communities.

 

"The crux of the issue is that Russian Hindus were given a temple which was demolished to make way for a commercial complex and were then promised a piece of land to build another temple. This has now been taken back and Hindus in Russia have no place to worship," said Lord Dholakia. "We will therefore be seeking a meeting with the Russian Ambassador in the UK with a view to arranging a visit to Russia to discuss this issue with the Orthodox Church and Moscow authorities."

 

"The Hindu community in the UK has come of age with organisations like the Hindu Forum of Britain taking up issues like these," explained Ashok Kumar, the main host for the reception. "We will now speak to the Foreign Secretary to seek a meeting and address some of the issues raised by the global Hindu community regarding the issues in Russia."

 

His Holiness Bhakti Vijnana Swami, who leads the campaign in Russia and had arrived from Moscow to attend the launch, made a presentation on the history of Russian Hinduism and appealed to British communities and Parliamentarians to help safeguard the rights of Russian Hindus.

 

Michael Whine from the Board of Deputies of British Jews thanked the Hindu community for including references to the Jewish community in the resolution passed at the meeting and said, "When we have meetings at the Presidential level, we get assurances that the interests of the minority faith communities in Russia will be protected, but the difficulty we face is that such assurances rarely get filtered down to the lower levels of the hierarchy."

 

Ann Noonan who represented the Catholic Bishops Conference explained that the Christian tradition accepted that every human was created in the image of God and asked for everyone to be treated equally without discrimination.  She added, "We hope that the issues in Russia are resolved soon."

 

"What is happening in Russia is a direct violation of the Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights which Russia signed in 1996 and ratified in 1998," said Shabbir Lakha from the Muslim Council of Britain. "Perhaps those who are mistreating Hindus in Russia have not read the instructions in the Bible which urge readers to treat strangers in their land with utmost respect. The irony is that in Russia , the Hindu community are not even strangers as they are fellow Russians who have just chosen to follow another faith."

 

Other speakers at the launch included Dr Phyllis Starkey MP, Rob Morris MP, Gauri Dasa, President of Bhaktivedanta Manor ISKCON temple and Nitin Palan from the BAPS Swaminarayan Hindu Mission. Earlier, Ken Livingstone, the Mayor of London, had handed letters of concern from the Hindu Forum of Britain and other organisations to the Mayor of Moscow, Yuri Luzhkov, who had been visiting London last week.

 

Some members of the Russian Orthodox Church headed by Archbishop Nikon, orchestrated mass protests and started a misinformation campaign against Hindus in the Russian media. Many Hindus were victimised, threatened, bullied and even beaten and subjected to violence.

 

Yesterday the Russian Orthodox Church had issued a statement to the BBC saying that Hindus in Russia were free to practice and worship as they want, but that "No Church would stand by while their congregation were converted."

 

"Just last month, 250 demonstrators led by the Russian Orthodox Church had tried to stop a Hindu festival in South Russia asking all Hindus to 'drown in the sea' or stop following the Hindu tradition," explained Ramesh Kallidai, secretary general of the Hindu Forum of Britain. "Archbishop Nikon of the Russian Orthodox Church had written to the Mayor of Moscow to stop the building of a Hindu temple because he considered Lord Krishna an 'evil demon'. After continuing to harass Hindus and trying to stop them building a place of worship, how can the Orthodox Church claim that Hindus are 'free' to worship as they please? Something is seriously wrong with their understanding of the notion of freedom."

 

 

"We urge people of all faith traditions to intervene and stop this kind of outrageous behaviour against the peace-loving Hindus of Russia," concluded Vinay Tanna, Chair of the Public Relations Committee of ISKCON Bhaktivedanta Manor. "The international communities continue to monitor the situation closely."

 

Ends    

For more information contact Sanjay Mistry on 07810 368 772 or Ramesh Kallidai on 07915 383 103 or 07867 837 241

 

Editor's Notes:

1.       The Defend Russian Hindus Campaign is supported by the Hindu Forum of Britain, the National Council of Hindu Temples UK, the Hindu Council UK , Vishwa Hindu Parishad UK , International Society for Krishna Consciousness, the Hindu Council of Australia, the Hindu American Foundation and the Hindu Conference Canada .

 

2.       The Hindu Forum of Britain is the representative umbrella body for British Hindus with formal membership of over 250 Hindu organisations from different regions and cultural backgrounds in Britain . The Hindu Forum of Britain has conducted some of the largest community consultation activities on behalf of the Hindu community to influence Government policy and runs a number of projects for Hindu youth, women, community safety and temples.

 

3.       Although the Hindu Forum is a national organisation, it has a large regional presence through its membership from the largest regional umbrella organisations, religious organisations, community organisations and youth organisations.

 

4.      At the core of the Forum's activities is a strong belief in the richness and diversity of the Hindu culture, its value system that encompasses respect for all beings and faiths, and a cultural heritage that facilitates community cohesion and coexistence. For more information visit the HFB Website:  www.hinduforum.org .

 

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please send an email to info@hinduforum.org with "unsubscribe" in the subject field.


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.20/234 - Release Date: 18/01/2006


high-level mole in the bjp?

jan 19th

a stray comment by a friend made me think: why was the BJP/NDA so pusillanimous and ineffectual when in power?

the usual explanation is that they had been so used to being out of power that they didnt know what to do when inside.

also, it is true that the BJP in particular wanted to show everybody what nice guys they were, because of continuous media denigration and portrayal as some kind of monsters. also, they wanted to stay on in power and thought that the right way to do this was to drift leftwards.

but there is another reason: a high-level mole (not one of the visible long-term leaders but an invisible functionary) was in place, who successfully thwarted every feeble attempt to reduce the power of the 'secular' 'progressive' lobby and restore a semblance of balance.

think about it: a well-placed mole can wreak havoc with the best-laid plans. and did.

it's an exercise to the reader to figure out who this mole might have been. i have my suspicions but it is not prudent to name names these days.

marxists issuing fake voter cards in bengal; and their past in e bengal

jan 19th

one of the ways in which the leeches have hung on to power in bengal.

i got a private communication from a friend who says the following about marxists in bengal:

begin quote:

But its over for Bengal since all these communists are the very people whose wives, daughters and sisters were abducted, raped and converted by Muslims after 1940. When they arrived in Tripura after the Dhaka riots (1940) there was hardly a woman among them and said to an astonished King (a great patron of the arts and a wonderful patriot) that 'they didn't allows us to bring them'. It would have been better to die. No, they chose to live, to betray again.

end quote


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sriram

Hi Rajeev, Old habits die hard for CPM.. Please click on the link below to go to the page. If you think someone you know would like to read it too, do mail it to them.

Check This Out!!!

Log on to : http://www.timesofindia.com

nytimes: yanks really dont get it, do they?

jan 19th

another example of the yank belief that india is a muslim country. they are not generally aware of the existence of hindus. the only ones who know about hindus are the fundamentalists who are looking for conversion cannon fodder.

http://movies2.nytimes.com/2006/01/20/movies/20musl.html?8dpc

it's funny to see that in the audience in the still in the review, there is not a single person who is wearing a muslim outfit.

but most yanks believe that india is part of the middle east (ie muslim) or africa (ie black). i dont know how many times people have looked at me in disbelief when i said india is in asia. they disagree because for them, asia is only populated by yellow people.


nytimes: how to be a pain on the internet

jan 19th

the nine rules of successful trolling. hilarious :-) -- courtesy david pogue

i am not sure what the word 'pill' means, although following wodehouse, i too have used the term 'pill of the first water'.

===============

RULES FOR TROLLS AND PILLS

WHEREAS, 95 percent of all the e-mail received by critics and columnists is civil, friendly or respectfully constructive;

but WHEREAS, this is the Internet age, and we're all anonymous and can avoid making eye contact forever;

and WHEREAS, there's so much information overload, a little heat and drama on your part may be necessary just to be heard above the din;

and WHEREAS, many of those who fire off potshots are missing out on some of the best techniques for effective snippiness;

THEREFORE let us now post the rules for membership in the Pills of the American Internet Neighborhood Society.

1. Use the strongest language possible. Calling names is always effective, and four-letter words show that you mean business.

2. Having a violent opinion of something doesn't require you to actually try it yourself. After all, plenty of people heatedly object to books they haven't read or movies they haven't seen. Heck, you can imagine perfectly well if something is any good.

3. If it's a positive review that you didn't like, call the reviewer a "fanboy." Do not entertain the notion that the product, service, show, movie, book or restaurant might, in fact, be good. Instead, assume that the reviewer has received payment from the reviewee. Work in the word "shill" if possible.

4. If it's a negative review, call the reviewer a "basher" and describe the review as a "hatchet job." Accuse him of being paid off by the reviewee's *rival*.

5. If it's a mixed review, ignore the passages that balance the argument. Pretend that the entire review is all positive or all negative. Refer to it either as a "rave" or a "slam."

6. If you find a sentence early in the article that rubs you the wrong way, you are by no means obligated to finish reading. Stop right where you are--express your anger while it's still good and hot! What are the odds that the writer is going to say anything else relevant to your point later in the piece, anyway?

7. If the writer responds to your e-mail with evidence that you're wrong (for example, by citing a paragraph that you overlooked), disappear without responding. This is the anonymous Internet; slipping away without consequence or civility is your privilege.

8. Trolling is making a deliberately inflammatory remark, one that you know perfectly well is baloney, just to get a rise out of other people. Trolling is an art. Trolling works just fine for an audience of one (say, a journalist), but of course the real fun is trolling on public bulletin boards where you can get dozens of people screaming at you simultaneously. Comments on religion, politics or Mac-vs.-Windows are always good bets. The talented troll sits back to enjoy the fireworks with a smirk, and never, ever responds to the responses.

9. Don't let generalities slip by. Don't tolerate simplifications for the sake of a non-technical audience. Ignore conditional words like "generally," "usually" and "most." If you read a sentence that says, for example, "The VisionPhone is among the first consumer videophones," cite the reviewer's ignorance and laziness for failing to mention the prototype developed by AT&T for the 1964 World's Fair. Send copies of your note to the publication's publisher and, if possible, its advertisers.

And there you have it: the nine habits of highly effective pills. After all: if you're going to be a miserable curmudgeon, you may as well do it up right!

an epitaph for india

jan 19th

from arnold toynbee:

"Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder."

how to catch all the riff-raff in india in one place at one time

jan 19th

wouldn't it be wonderful if there were -- by some miracle -- a neutron bomb attack on JNU (or wherever this thing is) at the very time of this conclave? :-)

buildings will remain standing, but too bad about the fried comrades :-) comrade kebab, anyone? :-) (*disclaimer, i jest, i wouldn't dream of suggesting anyone be burnt or eaten -- i am not even a meat-eater *)

the comrades are so good at fabrication of data, they should be writing fiction. what about the millions murdered and ethnically cleansed in bangladesh and pakistan and kashmir and balochistan? of course there is no communalism there.

i should also provide a glossary so comrade-speak can be translated:

gujarat -- the one and only place in human history when a riot happened and actual mohammedans were killed

communal -- hindu

secular -- marxist, mohammedan or christist

UPA catapulted to power -- an election was bought and/or voting-machine fraud was committed. note: the money for this came from the rs. 258 crore windfall of iraqi food for oil

secular intervention -- marxists, mohammedans or christists killing hindus (eg maraad in kerala)

communal violence -- hindus refusing to passively die when marxists, mohammedans or christists want to kill them (see 'secular intervention' above)

secular invention -- fabrication of news and data and images (eg the posed and fraudulent mohammedan 'pleading for his life with folded hands' photo)

hate mobilization -- people asking for proof of secular inventions

look at the frauds behind all this:
k n pannikar -- doesn't know sanskrit, but was made vc of sri sankara sanskrit university
harsh mander -- kept his IAS seniority but worked for a 'charity' named actionaid at four times the salary
shabnam hashmi -- some mohammedan marxist was killed by somebody and his wife is now a big celebrity for no good reason

by the way, this was picked up from the 'progressive pakistan' newsgroup from a posting by yoginder sikand, another of the usual suspects.

isn't 'progressive pakistan' an oxymoron?

=========================

NATIONAL CONSULTATION ON COMMUNALISM
  anhadinfo@yahoo.co.in

       Reminder 1
 NATIONAL CONSULTATION ON COMMUNALISM
 JANUARY 26-27, 2006
 NEW  DELHI

 Dear friends,

 The communalisation of Indian society witnessed
during the last two decades
has now entered a new phase.  After the election of
2004 the Communal forces
are regrouping and revising new modes to regain the
lost ground and to further
their influence. Hate mobilisation against Muslims and
the attacks on
Christians are being relentlessly pursued. The Sangh
schools continue to imbibe
hate in young minds, through falsifying history and
demonizing minorities.
Despite the schism within the Parivar, the attempts at
communalisation ,
undertaken by social-cultural organisation is
unabated.

 The election in the summer of 2004 was no ordinary
election. The people of
India realised that its outcome would decisively
influence in many ways the
destiny of the nation. This election could either
return and further
legitimise, or else reject the band of determined,
highly motivated communal
forces that had mounted an unprecedented assault on
and challenge to the
secular democratic India.

 The Congress-led UPA alliance was catapulted to
power by people who had
decisively rejected the politics of hate. The
expectation was that the new
Government would recognize the significance of this
moment in our political and
social history and that it would take immediate steps
to reinforce the secular
democratic future of the country. Although some steps
have been taken
particularly in the field of education, the influence
of communal ideology has
not been effectively undermined.

 Gujarat still remains a blot on the secular image of
India. Even after four
years, little has changed for the survivors of
Gujarat.  The legal justice is
openly subverted and economic boycott and fear
persists for the victims of the
carnage.  There is no rehabilitation package, no
measures to secure independent
investigation, prosecution and trial. Life has not
improved in any way for the
survivors of the carnage. More than half of those
displaced from their homes in
2002 are unable to return, almost four years later.

 It was expected, as promised in the CMP, that the
UPA government would bring a
legislation to prevent communal violence. The
expectation was that the law would
strengthen the hands of citizens by codifying the
mandatory duties of the state
to prevent and control communal violence, and to
secure compensation and legal
justice. Instead, the proposed legislation enhances
the powers of the state
which is likely to go against the interest of the
marginalized groups,
particularly in states where the communal forces
control the governments.

 For the last few decades, people in different parts
of the country are
fighting against great odds to defend the secular
fabric of our land. This
battle continues despite changes in governments.
Communal parties like BJP may
get defeated in elections, but the strength of
communal organisations like RSS
is not affected. In this context it is necessary to
further - the secular
forces and organisations.

 For this reason, it is proposed to bring together
people who care deeply  and
are concerned about the survival of secular democracy
in India to meet in Delhi
on 26, 27 Jan, 2006.

 This meeting is intended to take stock of the
communal situation in various
parts of the country, particularly the steps adopted
by communal organisations
during the last two years. Through such reporting we
hope to chalk out a future
course of action to counter communal activities. For
that we would like you to
focus on the following:


  Communal organisations working in your state, both
new and old
  The nature of communal activities and their
strategies
  Evidence of violence.
  Discrimination against minorities.
  Communalisation of Adivasis and Dalits.
  Communal influence in education.
  Govt support to communal organisations
  What are the secular interventions. are they
successful? If not what are the
reasons
  What are the possible modes of secular activities

 This meeting would like to arrive at a possible
future course of action for
secular interventions and bring into being a network
of communication among
secular groups and activists. The meeting would also
explore the possibility of
the formation of a monitoring group.

 Anhad is a small organization and is approaching a
number of organizations to
support the boarding and lodging facilities in Delhi
from the evening of
January 25th to the morning of January 28th, 2006. We
would appreciate if you
could arrange your travel through your organizations.

 It would be absolutely necessary to reach Delhi on
January 25th for those
traveling by train as all routes from the station are
closed on January 26th.

 Kindly confirm your participation as soon as
possible by e-mail/ ordinary post
or telephone. If you want to invite someone who is
working on this issue please
feel free to do so and ask him/ her to confirm with us
their participation.

 Looking forward to two days of very serious and
intense discussion.

 Sincerely

 Prof. KN Panikkar
 Harsh Mander
 Shabnam Hashmi

 December 25, 2005

 ANHAD
 4, WINDSOR PLACE, NEW DELHI-110001
 TEL-23327366/ 67
 e-mail: anhad_delhi@yahoo.co.in
 website: www.anhadindia.org

yanks getting worried about balochistan

jan 19th

pretty nice job the punjabis are doing. at this rate there are two outcomes:

1. they kill all the balochis
2. balochistan separates from pakistan

this is precisely the kind of colonial oppression the punjabis have trademarked in sindh and in occupied kashmir. oppression, exploitation and murder of the locals.

contrast this with the mohammedans of jammu and kashmir: they have the *lowest* rate of poverty in all of india! yet they whine the loudest.

what does 'balochistan' mean in punjabi? ans. 'vietnam' (yanks can relate to that)

again forwarded by someone, no url

=========================

  Baluchistan
           |    |    |                                        January 16, 2006
                     COMMENTARY             Baluchistan
 By FREDERIC GRARE and GEORGES PERKOVICH
January 16, 2006;?Page?A15

 If you can't find Baluchistan on a map, you're not alone.
 Here are some clues: It's next to Iran and Afghanistan. It's the biggest province in Pakistan, the one where most of the oil and gas rigs are. Lots of Chinese can be found there, because they are building an enormous commercial and military port in Gwadar, at the mouth of the Persian Gulf. There are two military bases from which U.S. forces fight the war on terrorism.
 Don't plan a trip to Baluchistan any time soon, though. It's recently come under fire from troops, helicopter gunships and fighter bombers -- sent by the West's favorite military ruler, Gen. Pervez Musharraf.
 Baluchistan, which has a literacy rate of 25% (3% for women), has never been integrated into Pakistan. Neither Baluchistan's rough tribal leaders nor the Punjabi-dominated elites of Pakistan have been able to rise beyond an uneasy colonial relationship. The current Baluch insurgency is the fourth in 67 years.
  Since 9/11, the U.S. government has downplayed the importance of democratic reform in Pakistan, and Baluchistan shows why this is a dangerous mistake. Repression by the military-dominated central government will only exacerbate Pakistan's instability and economic problems. The two U.S. bases in Baluchistan -- and other cooperation needed in combating terrorism in Afghanistan -- could be compromised. Chaos in Baluchistan also could aggravate competitive Sino-U.S. relations in the region.
 The Baluch have three main grievances that all reflect a general sense of being exploited as a colony by Punjab, the most powerful and populated province of Pakistan.
 They demand a fairer share of royalties generated by the production of natural gas in their province. The federal government pays a much lower price for each unit of gas produced in Baluchistan than it does for gas produced in other provinces. Moreover, Baluchistan receives no more than 12.4% of the royalties generated for supplying gas.
 The people of Baluchistan want to be included, rather than marginalized, in the huge development projects the central government has brought to the coast, particularly the Gwadar port. There is no technical school or college in the area to train locals for future participation in the development projects. Those employed so far have been only daily wage laborers.
 They also reject the Punjabi-dominated army's establishment of new military cantonments in their province, and the selling at nominal prices by the central government of choice coastal property to out-of-province developers.
 In other words, the Baluch want Baluchistan for Baluchis, not for others.
 The government replies that Baluchistan's resources are national property and has made only nominal concessions. The conflict, it says, is the fault of a few greedy obscurantist tribal leaders opposed to the development of the province.
 This argument resembles that which the Punjabi-dominated central government made in the early 1970s toward East Pakistanis before massive violence and war with India erupted, leading to the creation of Bangladesh. Similarly the Musharraf regime has responded with military force, air strikes, and -- according to some reports -- the use of napalm.
 The military rulers of Pakistan are more fearful of the situation than they admit, and have tried to conceal the real nature of the conflict in different ways. Baluchistan is an anti-clerical province whose tribes have nothing to do with the sort of Islamism of the Taliban or al Qaeda. Yet the Pakistani government has tried to tar the Baluch with the Islamist brush, in part to keep the international community from paying more attention to the real problems in the province.
 The central government in Islamabad also has sought to blame the unrest on "foreign hands," with the main culprits being India, Iran and the U.S., depending on who the audience is. Lately, the government says "criminal elements" lay behind the insurgency.
 The truth is that the development level is abysmal throughout the province. Many of the Baluchis' claims could have been satisfied without jeopardizing the country's territorial integrity. The leaders of the Baluch nationalist movement have made it known that they would be satisfied with a generous version of autonomy. Instead, the conflict is now spreading.
 Reconciling conflicting interests and seeking fair allocations of the costs and benefits of development is what governments are supposed to do. And history suggests that democratic governments, for all their drawbacks, tend to produce fairer allocations than dictatorships do.
 By contrast, the manipulation of the 2002 elections, which gave the provincial government to a coalition of conservatives and Islamists, deprived the Baluch nationalists of any say in the allocation of resources.
 Baluchistan is yet another example of the risks of postponing democratization in Pakistan. The outcome could be a major civil war, whose consequences on regional stability and the war against terrorism are likely to be unpredictable -- and anything but positive.
 Mr. Grare is a visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Studies, where Mr. Perkovich is vice-president for Studies.


tres interessant, n'est-ce pas? the rewards of dhimmitude

jan 19th

forwarded by someone, sorry dont have the source.

sounds *so* similar to what happens in india: if a train and passengers are torched, why, it is the fault of the train and the passengers, not of the "youths". if ethnic cleansing happens, why, it is the fault of those who were cleansed, not of the "youths", who are simply "misguided" "boys" (copyright mufti mohammed sayeed. although it's funny that when the "boys" kidnapped his daughter, he didn't laugh it off with a shrug, "boys will be boys".)

dhimmitude ki jai.

anyone in france or europe who can verify that this happened?

================

The Great Train Razzia



     By Nidra Poller : BIO | 17 Jan 2006

       Discuss This Story! (1)   Email |   Print |  Bookmark |  Save



           Paris 5 January 2006 -- French opinion makers are against the
clash of civilizations the same way they are against the war in Iraq:
fervently sure of their own moral superiority. But reality has a way of its
own, and the Great Train Razzia that rang in the New Year on the Côte d'Azur
is a smashing illustration of the clash of civilizations.

           One hundred drunk and disorderly "youths" from the "sensitive
neighborhoods" outside of Marseille were let loose in a train carrying
revelers from Nice to Lyon via Marseille. They vandalized the train,
terrorized the passengers, stole from them, sexually assaulted several young
women, made convincing death threats and, when all these wicked deeds were
done, pulled the emergency brake and jumped the train on the outskirts of
Marseille.

           It took several days for the story to break. Apparently
management of the state-owned SNCF railway system and local police officials
thought they could avoid bad publicity by keeping the information to
themselves. Even more surprising: no local journalist scooped the story, no
eyewitnesses came forward to reveal it, the media blissfully announced that
New Year's Eve had been surprisingly calm -- only 425 cars torched and 13
gendarmes injured -- that the state of emergency was lifted.

           The news broke on the 4th: 600 passengers returning at dawn from
Nice to Lyon were terrorized for three hours by a gang of "youths." As the
bare details filtered through several layers of protective screening, it
became clear that a major clash of civilizations.in fact a head on crash of
civilizations had taken place on the 1st day of the year 2006. Joyful
partygoers on the star-studded Riviera were delivered into the hands of a
hundred drunken marauders.

           Every official involved in the incident behaved stupidly, no one

communicated, no one took responsibility, and the result would be comical if
it were not so ominous. The train was not hermetically sealed. The conductor
's cabin was not occupied by terrorists armed with box cutters. There are
all sorts of stations between Nice and Marseille. Though the hoodlums stole
cell phones, several hundred remained in the hands of their owners. And the
ordeal went on for hours.

           Here, as far as one can gather without having been in the train,
is what happened:

           Police shoved a hundred drunken rowdies into regional train N°
17430 that was carrying 600 passengers home at dawn on the 1st of January.
The SNCF had been running a promotional New Year's Eve fare of 1?20 since
2001. The idea was to save lives by discouraging people from driving after
partying all night. Civilized idea, n'est-ce pas? For the rest of the
voyage, imagine a 1950s French comedy on the Riviera combined with a
slapstick version of a medieval jihad raid. Now think of the train chugging
its way along a breathtakingly beautiful coastline, and crossing
approximately 20 frontiers in the space of three hours. Yes, France without
Borders is cross-hatched into a muddle of intersecting administrations
governed by a bevy of chiefs, préfets, commanders, divisionary
commissioners, and assorted petty officials whose indecisions outweigh their
decisions.

           The four SNCF security agents who boarded the train at 6:30,
seeing nothing amiss, got off at St. Raphaël at 6:50. And the rambunctious
young people immediately started roughing up passengers, stealing from them,
threatening to kill them if they resisted or tattled. They took possession
of a first class car, ripped up the curtains, bashed the seats, vomited and
who knows what else. Cultural difference, if you see what I mean. For a
civilized traveler, first class means greater comfort for a higher price.
For the marauders it means épater la bourgeoise, or more precisely vomit on
them.

           At approximately 7:30 AM, the conductor decided that the train
was no longer safe and stopped at les Arcs. Employees have the right to lay
down their tools and walk off the job if their safety is endangered.
According to some accounts the gendarmes were waiting on the platform,
others claim it took them half an hour or more to arrive. One gendarme
describes "prostrate passengers who didn't dare intervene." Little by little
the gendarmes fanned out through the 10 cars of the train, "without
confronting the troublemakers." The train was immobilized for an
hour-and-a-half, the gendarmes tried to encourage passengers to file
complaints, but for some reason didn't get much of a response. A few
passengers fled the train. Including one young woman who had been sexually
assaulted. When she resumed her voyage on a later train with a higher fare,
the conductor made her pay the difference. Bonk! Clash of civilizations. A
law-abiding young woman, victim of the traditional jihad treatment of
conquered peoples, is expected to pay the correct fare. A horde of wild
bandidos is allowed to run riot up and down the train. And when a handful, a
tiny handful are caught, the judge sets most of them free.

           Except for Aziz Ed Doubia of Moroccan origin and a repeat
offender named Ashraf Bouzizoua; they are in prison awaiting trial. The
train pulled out of Les Arcs, under a light guard of fifteen gendarmes, who
got off in Toulon as three policemen got on but for some strange reason were
not able to curtail the razzia. As the train reached the outskirts of
Marseille, the junior jihadis pulled the emergency brake, jumped the train,
turned around and bashed and stoned it, and then scattered to their just
abodes, there to sleep off a most exciting New Year's Eve escapade.

           It is easy to understand why the "youths" preferred to leave
before the train pulled into the station, but who can understand why the
passengers didn't flee while it was docked at Les Arcs? Were they too
terrified to try to escape? Did they think the "youths" would catch them and
slit their throats? They did promise to bleed (meaning in fact to slaughter)
anyone who dared denounce them. Or were the passengers so dhimmified that
they considered their punishment to be justified? Or normal?

           It could have been worse. That's the buzzphrase here in France.
The riots weren't all that bad, no one was killed. Well, in fact about eight
people were killed, not counting the two kids whose accidental deaths were
the provocative incident that set off the junior intifada.but who's
counting?

           Why did officials allow the train to pursue its course after the
stop at Arcs-Draguignan? Procureur Christian Girard explains: "It seemed
rather tricky to make all those youths leave the train because most of them
had done nothing but minor vandalism and the other passengers were in a rush
to get going again." An official at SNCF headquarters put it another way: if
the train was allowed to run it means everything was under control. Logical,
n'est-ce pas?

           Interior Minister Sarkozy, who was not informed until three days
after the fact, is promising stringent measures, an end to impunity, minors
will be treated like majors when they commit major offenses, and the special
railroad police force will be extended to the entire network. And, says the
straightforward Minister, the troublemakers are not "youths" they are
"voyous," hooligans.

           Socialist party leader François Hollande, in a rare call for law
and order, took the Minister to task for not controlling the situation with
a firm hand and accused the government of covering up the real extent of New
Year's Eve violence. For a party that has been actively cultivating the
hooligan vote, this was an astonishing breakthrough.

           But the prize for lucidity goes to a real youth, a 17 year-old
from Draguignan named Habib. He was accosted by those hooligans on his way
to Nice with some friends on the afternoon of the 31st. "They were Arabs. We
tried to defend ourselves but they said they had 47 guys with them.. They
said they were going to go on the rampage ('hala' in Arabic), they were
going to make a massacre on New Year's Day.. They pushed around some guys,
and then they went after the girls. They would rub their own sex and then
smear the girl's face. They threatened us with teargas bombs..They said they
had knives. The way it looked to me, they were organized...The next day we
waited until the afternoon train. We didn't want to meet up with them
 again."

           Ah bon? So it didn't all start at the break of dawn?

           In fact, the police first met up with the Barbary pirates when
they sailed into Nice on New Year's Eve, already drunk and disorderly. The
police patted them down, took mug shots, held the most dangerous ones under
arrest for the night, and kept tabs on the others so they wouldn't get into
trouble. Then, making sure the kids calmed down, they escorted them to train
N° 17430.

           And that's how the Arabs whose behavior shocked and frightened
Habib turned into youths. And that's how the hooligans who wreaked havoc
from one end to the other of a ten-car train calmed down and became youths
whenever a railroad security guard or gendarme approached gingerly and
ducked out in a flash. And that's how the vandals who made grown men tremble
turn into youths when they walk into a courtroom, and get released.

           And don't forget, there was nothing religious about this whole
operation, because good Muslims don't drink. But just pick up a copy of The
Legacy of Jihad,* open to any page, and you will find a vivid description of
the razzia mentality that permeates these two-bit conquering hordes. One
commentator remarked with surprise that the troublemakers swept down on
their hapless victims from their bastion in Marseille, which stayed calm
during the flaming uprising of November. The inside story is that drug
dealers and other black marketers had given strict orders: no funny
business. They didn't want the police invading their citadel.

           So it's only normal that the kids break out for a little fun on
New Year's Eve. In fact, it's a tradition. Every year the SNCF does its 1?20
promotion, and every year the budding barbarians tear up the train. Not to
worry. Every year the fares go up. And the dhimmis pay the damages.

           * Andrew Bostom, The Legacy of Jihad, Prometheus Books

kristof on india-china

jan 19th

this is premium content, so i am only giving you excerpts.

i think kristof is just mouthing conventional wisdom, but there is that niggling matter of strategic intent. we have the strategic intent to be (drum roll) second-best!!!!  i wrote in a column a while ago that the biggest crime of j nehru was to reduce india's aspirations: he didnt want india to be a super power, he just wanted it to be an also-ran. that is the strategic intent of the nehruvian stalinists, and we are unerringly proving ourselves to be also-rans.

i also have another contention: that AIDS is not threatening india's productivity as much as falling fertility is threatening europe's or japan's or china's. i think, heartlessly, that AIDS is just another pandemic like we always had -- it was TB a hundred years ago, then it was something else. nature/god figures out ways to keep our n